Liafen Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Heck, one could even argue that a split Gladstone/Stone race even benefits Hüller and could propel her to come insanely close to gold since her nr of votes is unaffected by AMPAS members' inherent want to vote for the eventual winner. (I assume that also helped Colman in the Gaga/Glenn split race.)
WildAmerican Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 bad timing for the Emmys, they're gonna seem so copy/paste when Beef/The Bear/Succession sweep everything 1
Liafen Posted January 15 Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, Leptine said: You can't compare an established veteran like Frances McDormand with +40 years of career and Emma Stone, it tookher +20 years to win the second, 2 totally different positions and scenarios. The last time a young actress pulled a double win in lead with few years of distance is Jodie Foster +30 years ago in a movie that was frontrunner to win best picture and that it was the movie case the year that became an instant cult with a big box office, definitely not the case of Stone. And Mery's third took 30 years and a certain someone but she's also an established veteran. I'm just saying that the same 'Academy members won't give out 2nd (or in case 3rd) awards so soon' reasoning was used against the likeliness of a McDormand win in '21, with her being 2nd/3rd in the standings. Mahershala Ali comes to mind as well. I think pundits and predictors put way too much importance on previous wins, as if it's a be-all end-all argument on why someone won't win.
Leptine Posted January 15 Posted January 15 5 minutes ago, Liafen said: It wouldn't have been shocking, that's true, it was in the realm of possibility, but it also wasn't an expected win. Everyone already kinda knew Lily would take it. She could've used the visibility of course, but losing there doesn't mean she's done. Days after her loss, she suddenly gained a huge momentum with PGA noms for both Anatomy and Zone. With BAFTA, what I'm saying is that there's actually a membership overlap there with AMPAS, and a win could indicate that the British/International bloc stands behind Hüller. I'm not saying it will be enough for her to pull through, but If she doesn't win that, she's out in 99.99% of the possible scenarios come Oscar night. It's not impossible of course, but we're talking predictions, at the actual state of things, I don't see her winning with only a BAFTA, assuming she's gonna take it.
Leptine Posted January 15 Posted January 15 1 hour ago, Liafen said: And Mery's third took 30 years and a certain someone but she's also an established veteran. I'm just saying that the same 'Academy members won't give out 2nd (or in case 3rd) awards so soon' reasoning was used against the likeliness of a McDormand win in '21, with her being 2nd/3rd in the standings. Mahershala Ali comes to mind as well. I think pundits and predictors put way too much importance on previous wins, as if it's a be-all end-all argument on why someone won't win. Again, they are different scenarios for different reasons, the year that McDormand won the third it was also a fractured race with the drama Globe going to a contender that nobody was expecting and that was barely predicted (Andra Day) that was never going to win the Oscar, all the precursors that year went to different people, it was unprecedent (recently at least) in that category, wins need to be analyzed also in the specific contest. Alì is in another category with an already recent precedent of winning two in short times (Waltz), and yes the Academy proved majority of times to rarely give second or third Oscar easily, especially in certain categories, it's pointless mentioning very rare and specific scenarios when doing predictions, otherwise we can stay name Marcia Gay Harden and thinking that everybody can pull a win.
fridayteenage Posted January 15 Posted January 15 best actress this century, times when a viable repeat winner lost: blanchett - against the BP winner davis - against the BP winner arguably streep 2009 - solo nom, vs. bullock who managed to drag her movie to a bp nom just off of her performance christie - in a film with 1 other nom spacek - in a supporting wife role I don't think "oscars don't like giving repeat wins so easily" is necessarily true. Emma is not against the BP winner, is in a movie that should get plenty of noms, and is not a supporting wife.
Hector Posted January 15 Posted January 15 3 minutes ago, fridayteenage said: best actress this century, times when a viable repeat winner lost: arguably streep 2009 - solo nom, vs. bullock who managed to drag her movie to a bp nom just off of her performance She had a much better shot of winning the year before since she won the SAG for Doubt, and had Winslet not been so painfully overdue.
fridayteenage Posted January 15 Posted January 15 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Hector said: She had a much better shot of winning the year before since she won the SAG for Doubt, and had Winslet not been so painfully overdue. after kate was officially in lead for The Reader, she was a complete lock Edited January 15 by fridayteenage
Hector Posted January 15 Posted January 15 1 minute ago, fridayteenage said: after kate was officially in lead for The Reader, she was a mortal lock After the BAFTA win, yes. And I think Carey Mulligan was also neck-in-neck with Meryl at the 2010 Oscars since she won the BAFTA for An Education.
fridayteenage Posted January 15 Posted January 15 5 minutes ago, Hector said: After the BAFTA win, yes. no, upon the nomination. globes: double kate win sag: kate and meryl win bafta: kate win The only chance meryl had was if Kate got double Oscar noms, lead for Rev and sup for Reader. 1
TheDreamer Posted January 16 Posted January 16 This wouldn't have been a problem with Gladstone if she sticked with Supporting which is what her performance is 2
EnigmaticAndroid Posted January 16 Posted January 16 5 minutes ago, TheDreamer said: This wouldn't have been a problem with Gladstone if she sticked with Supporting which is what her performance is Yeah, I think that's her biggest hurdle. A decent amount of people don't even see her as a lead. That's a fundamental issue for the category she's competing in. And then there's the fact that it's a very passive, reactionary role. Needless to say, the idea that she's a lock for SAG is honestly a bit baffling to me. When we put aside her narrative, when was the last time a performance and role like Mollie won Lead Actress at SAG? It'd be an unusual pick for them. 2
family.guy123 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 4 hours ago, fridayteenage said: no, upon the nomination. globes: double kate win sag: kate and meryl win bafta: kate win The only chance meryl had was if Kate got double Oscar noms, lead for Rev and sup for Reader. That nomination morning was so crazy. She likely got enough votes for 3 nominations if they allowed it.
wesleywalrus Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Would be thrilled waking up Oscar morning to a Gladstone supporting nom. Stone / Murphy / Gladstone / RDJ Gosling would be so goated.
Liafen Posted January 16 Posted January 16 5 hours ago, family.guy123 said: That nomination morning was so crazy. She likely got enough votes for 3 nominations if they allowed it. Three? Rev, Reader, and?
keerbyriri Posted January 16 Posted January 16 14 hours ago, Leptine said: The last time a young actress pulled a double win in lead with few years of distance is Jodie Foster +30 years ago in a movie that was frontrunner to win best picture and that it was the movie case the year that became an instant cult with a big box office, definitely not the case of Stone. Hilary Swank did it more recently than Foster, similar distance that Stone has between wins if she snatches it for Poor Things. Stone is undeniable in Poor Things and has even more industry/public respect than Swank did, I think she wins this. 3
family.guy123 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 4 hours ago, Liafen said: Three? Rev, Reader, and? Reader x2
Leptine Posted January 16 Posted January 16 2 hours ago, keerbyriri said: Hilary Swank did it more recently than Foster, similar distance that Stone has between wins if she snatches it for Poor Things. Stone is undeniable in Poor Things and has even more industry/public respect than Swank did, I think she wins this. Swank situation is more similar to Foster tho, since the movie for which she won the second was frontrunner to win best picture, director and another acting category with a big box office success, it was the most talking about movie that year and she didn't have a strong competition since she was the only one between nominees attached to a best picture conteder. My point is that Stone being already a recent and young winner plays in favor of Gladstone, considering at the actual state of things I still see her as frontrunner, if Stone takes SAG then I won't have doubts to predic Stone winning (assuming Gladstone is not winning BAFTA).
hausofdave Posted January 16 Posted January 16 With the prospect of Holdovers winning 2 acting awards, don't see how Payne misses. Three Billboards was divisive so that's how I'll explain McDonagh.
WildAmerican Posted January 16 Author Posted January 16 i'll try to start updating the thread title based on latest happenings, someone remind me if I start slipping
fridayteenage Posted January 16 Posted January 16 1 hour ago, hausofdave said: With the prospect of Holdovers winning 2 acting awards, don't see how Payne misses. Three Billboards was divisive so that's how I'll explain McDonagh. as good as it gets? dallas buyers club? i also don't think (for now) that paul will win.
WildAmerican Posted January 16 Author Posted January 16 The 2023 Visual Effects Society (VES) Nominations OUTSTANDING VISUAL EFFECTS IN A PHOTOREAL FEATURE “Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves” “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3” “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” “Oppenheimer” “The Creator” OUTSTANDING SUPPORTING VISUAL EFFECTS IN A PHOTOREAL FEATURE “John Wick: Chapter 4” “Killers of the Flower Moon” “Napoleon” “Nyad” “Society of the Snow” OUTSTANDING VISUAL EFFECTS IN AN ANIMATED FEATURE “Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget” “Elemental” “Nimona” “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse” “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem” 2
Hector Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Motion Picture Sound Editors Golden Reel Award Nominations: Spoiler Outstanding Achievement in Sound Editing – Feature Animation “Elemental” Disney / Pixar Supervising Sound Editors: Ren Klyce, Coya Elliott Sound Designer: Ren Klyce Sound Effects Editors: Jonathan Stevens, Ben Burtt, Kim Patrick, Steve Bissinger Supervising Dialogue Editor: Rich Quinn Dialogue Editor: Lisa Chino Supervising Foley Editor: Dee Selby Foley Editor: Nicolas Docter Foley Artists: Shelley Roden MPSE, Heikki Kossi MPSE “Migration” Illumination Supervising Sound Editors: Daniel Laurie, Josh Gold Sound Effects Editors: Richard Gould, Luke Dunn-Gielmuda, Scott Guitteau Supervising Foley Editor: Thom Brennan Foley Editor: E. Larry Oatfield Foley Artists: Sean England, Andrea Gard Music Editor: Bill Bernstein “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse” Sony Pictures Animation Supervising Sound Editor: Geoffrey G. Rubay Sound Designers: John J. Pospisil, Alec G. Rubay, Kip Smedley Sound Effects Editors: Cathryn Wang, David Werntz, Bruce Tanis MPSE, Greg ten Bosch MPSE, Daniel McNamara MPSE, Will Digby, Andy Sisul Supervising Dialogue Editor: James Morioka MPSE Dialogue Editors: Robert Getty MPSE, Jason W. Freeman, Kai Scheer, Ashley N. Rubay Foley Supervisor: Colin Lechner MPSE Foley Artist: Gregg Barbanell MPSE, Jeff Wilhoit MPSE, Dylan Wilhoit Supervising Music Editor: Katie Greathouse Music Editor: Barbara McDermott “The Super Mario Bros Movie” Universal Pictures Supervising Sound Editor: Daniel Laurie Sound Designers: Randy Thom MPSE, Jamey Scott MPSE Sound Effects Editors: Leff Lefferts, Qianbaihui Yang MPSE, Scott Guitteau Supervising Foley Editor: E. Larry Oatfield Foley Editor: Zach Martin Foley Artists: Ronni Brown, Jana Vance, Sean England Outstanding Achievement in Sound Editing – Feature Documentary “32 Sounds” ArKtype Supervising ADR Editor: Eliza Paley Sound Designer: Mark Mangini MPSE Sound Editor: Robert Kellough MPSE ADR Editor: Mari Matsuo Foley Artist: Joanna Fang MPSE “American Symphony” Higher Ground Productions Supervising Sound Editor: Tristan Baylis MPSE, Tom Paul Foley Artist: Leslie Bloome Sound Effects Editors: Matt Snedecor, Mark Filip “Mourning In Lod” Medalia Productions Supervising Sound Editors: Yossi Appelbaum, Lior Weitzman Sound Designer: Yossi Appelbaum “Still: A Michael J. Fox Movie” AppleTV+ Supervising Sound Editor: Skip Lievsay Sound Effects Editor: Rich Bologna Dialogue Editor: Michael Feuser Foley Supervisor: Matt Haasch Foley Editor: Heather Gross Foley Artist: Jay Peck “Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour” Taylor Swift Productions Sound Editor: Phil DeTolve Music Supervisor: David Cook Outstanding Achievement in Sound Editing – Foreign Language Feature “Anatomy of a Fall” Neon Sound Editors: Fanny Martin, Jeanne Delplancq “The Zone of Interest” A24 Supervising Sound Editor: Johnnie Burn MPSE Sound Effects Editors: Simon Carroll, Max Behrens, Joe Mount, Brendan Feeney Foley Editors: Ewa Mazurkiewicz, Natalia Lubowiecka MPSE, Dawid Konecki, Kamil Kwiatkowski “Godzilla Minus One” Robot Communications Foley Artist: Natsuko Inoue “Society of the Snow” Netflix Supervising Sound Editors: Oriol Tarragó, Iosu Martinez, Guillem Giró Foley Artists: Erik Vidal, Kiku Vidal Sound Editors: Sarah Romero, Marc Bech, Brendan Golden Sound Designer: Oriol Tarragó Music Editor: John Finklea Outstanding Achievement in Sound Editing – Feature Dialogue / ADR “Barbie” Supervising Sound Editors: Ai-Ling Lee, Dan Kenyon Warner Bros. Supervising Dialogue / ADR Editor: Brian Bowles MPSE Dialogue Editors: Kate Bilinski, Tony Martinez, Tyler Newhouse “Killers of the Flower Moon” AppleTV+ Supervising Sound Editors: Philip Stockton, Eugene Gearty Dialogue Editors: Julia Stockton, Philip Stockton ADR Editor: Marissa Littlefield “Maestro” Netflix Supervising Sound Editors: Richard King, Rich Bologna Supervising Dialogue / ADR Editor: Tony Martinez Dialogue Editors: Eliza Paley, Jac Rubenstein, Fred Rosenberg Supervising Music Editor: Jason Ruder “Napoleon” AppleTV+ Supervising Sound Editors: Oliver Tarney MPSE, James Harrison Supervising Dialogue Editor: Michael Maroussas Dialogue Editor: Rachael Tate MPSE “Oppenheimer” Universal Pictures Supervising Sound Editor: Richard King Supervising Dialogue Editor: David Bach Dialogue Editors: Russell Farmarco, Albert Gasser MPSE “Poor Things” Searchlight Pictures Supervising Sound Editor: Johnnie Burn MPSE Dialogue Editors: Tristan Baylis MPSE, Peter Russell Outstanding Achievement in Sound Editing – Feature Effects / Foley “Gran Turismo” Columbia Pictures Supervising Sound Editors: Kami Asgar MPSE, Erin Oakley Sound Designer: Charles Deenen Sound Effects Editors: Sam Fan, Matt Cavanaugh MPSE Sound Designer: Tim Gedemer MPSE Foley Artists: Gary Hecker MPSE, Mike Horton Foley Editor: Jessica Parks “Ferrari” Neon Supervising Sound Editors: Tony Lamberti, Bernard Weiser MPSE Sound Designer: David Wentz Sound Effects Editor: Brent Findley MPSE, Steven Ticknor, Benjamin Cook MPSE Supervising Foley Editor: Beso Kacharava MPSE Foley Artist: Biko Gogaladze Foley Editors: Alexander Sanikidze, Rati Chkhetiani “John Wick Chapter 4” Lionsgate Supervising Sound Editor: Paul Soucek MPSE Sound Designers: Mark Stoeckinger, Luke Gibleon, Olivia Xiao’ou Zhang MPSE, Stephen Robinson MPSE, Gael Nicolas Sound Effects Editors: Casey Genton, Nicolas Interlandi “Napoleon” AppleTV+ Supervising Sound Editors: Oliver Tarney MPSE, James Harrison Sound Designers: Mike Fentum, Hugo Adams Sound Effects Editors: Aran Clifford, Kevin Penney, Rowan Watson Foley Artists: Oliver Ferris, Sue Harding “Oppenheimer” Universal Pictures Supervising Sound Editor: Richard King Sound Effects Editor: Michael Mitchell Sound Designer: Randy Torres Supervising Foley Editor: Christopher Flick Foley Artists: Dan O’Connell, John Cucci MPSE “The Killer” Netflix Sound Designer: Ren Klyce Sound Effects Editors: Jonathon Stevens, Malcolm Fife Supervising Sound Editor: Jeremy Molod Supervising Foley Editor: Thom Brennan Foley Editor: Dee Selby Foley Artists: Shelley Roden MPSE, John Roesch MPSE Outstanding Achievement in Music Editing – Documentary “American Symphony” Netflix Lead Music Editor: Ignacio Bonet “Pianoforte” Greenwich Entertainment Supervising Music Editor: Michal Fojcik MPSE Music Editor: Joanna Popowicz “Still: A Michael J. Fox Movie” AppleTV+ Music Editor: Bill Bernstein “Wham!” Netflix Music Editor: Greg Gettens Outstanding Achievement in Music Editing – Feature Motion Picture “Barbie” Warner Bros. Supervising Music Editor: Suzana Perić Music Editor: Mick Gormaley “Creed III” Amazon / MGM Music Editor: Nicholas Fitzgerald “Maestro” Netflix Supervising Music Editor: Jason Ruder Music Editor: Victoria Ruggiero “Oppenheimer” Universal Pictures Supervising Music Editor: Amanda Goodpaster Music Editors: Felipe Pacheco, Alex Gibson “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse” Sony Pictures Supervising Music Editor: Katie Greathouse Music Editor: Barbara McDermott “Wonka” Warner Bros. Supervising Music Editor: Katrina Schiller MPSE Music Editors: Mark Willsher MPSE, Michael Connell, Janet Grab 1
Gui Blackout Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Oscar voters if you're in line for Andrew Scott STAY IN LINE! 2
Recommended Posts