Jump to content

96th Academy Awards | Top Winners: Oppenheimer 7x, Poor Things 4x


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well damn, Christopher Abbott really gives Poor Things a new jolt in the last 20 minutes. But he is always amazing so shouldn't come as a surprise.

 

He or Dafoe should be up for Supporting Actor, not Ruffalo.

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • hausofdave

    389

  • WildAmerican

    314

  • Donquizote

    285

  • Almodusa

    281

Posted (edited)

its funny cuz Dafoe seems to specialize in getting nominated for films that the academy ignores otherwise, after Florida project/at eternity's gate; while shadow of the vampire just got makeup along with Dafoe. 

 

sorta like Jessica Lange with 4/6 noms: country, sweet dreams, music box, blue sky.

Edited by fridayteenage
  • Like 1
Posted

caught Napoleon tonight, deserved its noms, but overall was kinda not that good... great battles, beautiful battles tho :eli:

Posted

Just finished The Zone of Interest rewatch and I don’t mind it as much as I did when I first saw it. Still doesn’t do much for me. I think these types of no plot films (like Nomadland) are things I need to watch at home than in theaters. 

Posted

Rewatching Blue Valentine now. Michelle's performance ages like fine wine. Yup, she was robbed of Oscar for that performance. Don't @ me :suburban:

  • Like 1
Posted

Also, I still can't get over the fact that Michelle was ROBBED at gunpoint for Manchester by the Sea :suburban:

Viola's performance and category fraud in Fences ages like milk :suburban:

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Next weekend :jonny5:

Best Actress and animated feature  are the only questionable categories imo

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, WildAmerican said:

Next weekend :jonny5:

Best Actress and animated feature  are the only questionable categories imo

Visual Effects isn’t too solidified yet me thinks, though I’m going into it expecting The Creator

  • Like 1
Posted

i'm inclined to think Michelle williams was also (a distant) runner-up for 2005 too. 

Posted

I need Emma to prove herself as a versatile actress and gets out from her comfort zone. Perhaps she should star as a long suffering wife in a drama movie next or as a monster like Charlize Theron in Monster. Only then she deserves that second Oscar :suburban:

Posted

finally watched Poor Things, what a fantastic film! now I can rank all BP nominees:

 

1. Poor Things

2. Anatomy of a Fall

3. The Zone of Interest

4. Barbie

5. Past Lives

6. The Holdovers

7. Killers of the Flower Moon

8. American Fiction

9. Oppenheimer

10. Maestro

  • Like 2
Posted

So many guild awards this weekend :duca: 

Posted

Lee is coming for that Best Actress win next year :duca:

Ready for her campiness during campaign :suburban:

Posted

Lead Actress
SAG + GG Drama vs BAFTA + GG Comedy:
 

2007 - Julie Christie, Away From Her (+ CC) V Marion Cotillard, La Vie en Rose (+ BAFTA Makeup+CD)

2018 - Glenn Close, The Wife (+ CC) V Olivia Colman, The Favourite (+ AACTA + BAFTA Makeup+CD)

2023 - Lily Gladstone, Killers of the Flower Moon (BAFTA snub) V? Emma Stone, Poor Things (+CC + BAFTA Makeup+CD)

Posted

Close was the only sole nomination for her movie while Julie already has an Oscar :suburban:

Posted
28 minutes ago, McNulty said:

https://forms.gle/7rzm4c47LisU6XeU7

 

Tomorrow is the deadline, so far I have 11 responses and 3 ties

 

:suburban:

I’ll probably finish watching everything I can by Oscar afternoon, delay it until then :suburban:

Posted
2 hours ago, Almodusa said:

I’ll probably finish watching everything I can by Oscar afternoon, delay it until then :suburban:

that's way too long, maybe I'll push it until the 7th of March :gaycat5:

Posted
9 hours ago, Donquizote said:

Also, I still can't get over the fact that Michelle was ROBBED at gunpoint for Manchester by the Sea :suburban:

Viola's performance and category fraud in Fences ages like milk :suburban:

And then she fraud herself to lose that oscar for The Fabelmans.

She can easily snatch that Oscar if she went for supporting instead of lead.

Posted (edited)

35% is lead

Michelle being in supporting would have been the fraud, its like saying Chastain was supporting in zero dark thirty or theron was supporting for bombshell

 

Only Oscar newbies pretending to be supporting is acceptableish since they never know if its their only chance ever

Edited by fridayteenage
Posted
4 hours ago, chiliam said:

And then she fraud herself to lose that oscar for The Fabelmans.

She can easily snatch that Oscar if she went for supporting instead of lead.

Jaime Lee could still win Oscar even if Michelle went supporting last year :suburban:

Tbh, she didn't deserve to get nominated for that cheap Spielberg's movie.

 

Posted

Michelle was giving an SNL level performance, she just got nominated because she was playing Spielberg's mom. :suburban:

Posted

Cinema Audio Society Awards (sound mixing)

Live Action: Oppenheimer

Animated: Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

Documentary: 32 Sounds

  • Like 1
Posted

USC Scripter: American Fiction

  • Like 1
Posted

Rooting for Emma's win :hippo:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.