Jump to content

96th Academy Awards | Top Winners: Oppenheimer 7x, Poor Things 4x


Recommended Posts

Posted

That’s cool that they’re brining that presentation format back. I hope they continue showing graphics of the nominees in the background when categories are presented followed by the winner on all screens like they did last year. I loved it.

 

spacer.png
spacer.png

spacer.png

spacer.png

  • Thanks 1

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • hausofdave

    389

  • WildAmerican

    314

  • Donquizote

    285

  • Almodusa

    281

Posted

Poor Things now on VOD, just saw it. Fellow Asian Emi Li is just astounding, her range >>>

This movie deserved all the awards.

I've seen 9/10 (only lacking Maestro) and these are a great group of Best Picture contenders.

Poor Things might be my fave.

 

I'm now a Baxter and Voyter truther

cheers-bella-baxter.gif

Posted

Voting closed!

Posted (edited)

I just watched Poor Things and I can't believe Emma is predicted to with this :rip:

 

I feel like the cinematography/writing completely auras the acting. If anything Mark Ruffalo had the best performance. 

 

Sandrallah remains the rightful winner

Edited by playboi
  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
5 hours ago, playboi said:

If anything Mark Ruffalo had the best performance.

You have to be trolling. :deadbanana2: Tf film did you watch?!

  • Like 2
Posted
14 hours ago, Rose said:

Past Lives and Maestro are the only ones I didn't see and I don't plan to.

 

14 hours ago, fridayteenage said:

Asian excellence, one of the best movies of the decade 

Yeah, Brad Li really snapped. :jonny4:

Posted

Anatomy of a Fall was so boring

  • Thumbs Down 10
Posted
20 hours ago, Konril said:

Poor Things now on VOD, just saw it. Fellow Asian Emi Li is just astounding, her range >>>

This movie deserved all the awards.

I've seen 9/10 (only lacking Maestro) and these are a great group of Best Picture contenders.

Poor Things might be my fave.

 

I'm now a Baxter and Voyter truther

cheers-bella-baxter.gif

watching this today

Posted
1 hour ago, Insanity said:

Anatomy of a Fall was so boring

Legend Voyter is coming for u!

 

Kingdom Kiis: Big Pop Gewhls 2017 VS Rate - COMPLETE | Page 217 | The  Popjustice Forum

Posted

The recent takes in this thread :biblio:

Posted

Poor Things was wonderful, visually stunning and one of Yorgos' best. Emma gave an amazing performance, fully deserves all the hype

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Tony McNamara gave us The Favourite, The Great and Poor Things back-to-back-to-back and the Oscars and Emmys paid him dust. Tragic 

  • Like 1
Posted

Poor Things was interesting.

Posted
2 hours ago, Liafen said:

Legend Voyter is coming for u!

 

Kingdom Kiis: Big Pop Gewhls 2017 VS Rate - COMPLETE | Page 217 | The  Popjustice Forum

I don't care lol. It was a bore and a chore to sit through i didn't even finish

  • Confused 4
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
3 minutes ago, Insanity said:

I don't care lol. It was a bore and a chore to sit through i didn't even finish

Oprah-Gif.gif

Posted
14 minutes ago, WildAmerican said:

Oprah-Gif.gif

Only 10 mins left

Posted

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, WildAmerican said:

Oprah-Gif.gif

Username checks out.

 

Oprah-Gif.gif

  • Haha 4
Posted
7 minutes ago, Liafen said:

Username checks out.

 

Oprah-Gif.gif

don't worry, Madame Defenestration will get ha 

 

Oprah-Gif.gif

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Emma Stone was AMAZING in Poor Things. However.... I doubt she'll win. Gladstone has a way more traditional Oscar type role. (No shade.) Emma's is maybe a bit too out there for them. Plus, politics. It would make history. For the second year in a row for the Oscar's. No way they will pass that up. 

 

Both deserving of winning by the way.

  • Like 1
Posted

Queen Kate Winslet cried after watching Lily in Killers. 

I think we know who she's going to vote for :suburban:

Posted
6 hours ago, Insanity said:

I don't care lol. It was a bore and a chore to sit through i didn't even finish

I'm choosing to believe your finger slipped and you mistakingly clicked on The Holdovers instead. :heart2:

Posted
4 hours ago, RunBoyRun said:

Emma Stone was AMAZING in Poor Things. However.... I doubt she'll win. Gladstone has a way more traditional Oscar type role. (No shade.) Emma's is maybe a bit too out there for them. Plus, politics. It would make history. For the second year in a row for the Oscar's. No way they will pass that up. 

 

Both deserving of winning by the way.

the movie is more traditional oscar bait. but the role of suffering supporting wife actually is tons more likely to win in supporting.

 

anywho, the top 2 in screentime for each actress nominated film, per screentimecentral:

Emma Stone - 1:37:19 (68.77%)

Mark Ruffalo - 31:07 (21.99%) = 213% more than the runner up

 

Sandra Hüller (Anatomy of a Fall) - 1:14:39 / 49.25%

Milo Machado Graner - 47:43 / 31.48% = 56% more than the runner up

 

Annette Bening (Nyad) - 1:20:21 / 66.32%

Jodie Foster (Nyad) - 1:00:16 / 49.75% = 33% more than the runner up

 

Bradley Cooper (Maestro) - 1:32:57 / 70.83%

Carey Mulligan (Maestro) - 1:04:15 / 48.96% = Brad 45% more 

 

Leonardo DiCaprio - 1:49:59 / 53.38%

Lily Gladstone (Killers of the Flower Moon) - 56:13 / 27.29% = Leo 96% more 

 

Emma definitely dominates her movie much more than the others. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.