Jump to content

Marianne Williamson responds to Biden's Press Secretary smug comment on her candidacy


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Helios said:

Going hard? By calling her thin skinned? Im not the one replying to every single person who doesnt like her. :ahh: 

Sis, you're perched in any thread about her. :deadbanana4: You're probably more active than in your entire 6 years on here.  Is this a dupe someone had sitting around? This blind Democratic partisanship was left behind with people girlboss stanning Clinton into a historical loss in 2016. Being a reply-guy for corporate Dems is not some flex.

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Communion

    13

  • anti-bitch

    6

  • GhostBox

    5

  • Helios

    5

Posted
1 minute ago, Communion said:

Sis, you're perched in any thread about her. :deadbanana4: You're probably more active than in your entire 6 years on here.  Is this a dupe someone had sitting around? This blind Democratic partisanship was left behind with people girlboss stanning Clinton into a historical loss in 2016. Being a reply-guy for corporate Dems is not some flex.

Every thread? This is the second thread Ive responded to about her but keep attacking random people for having their own opinions of her.  Just remember that she will NEVER be president. :toofunny3:

Posted

What incentive could someone have that drives them to mindlessly attack the fight for universal healthcare? :deadbanana4:

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Orsay said:

I really don’t know what you thought you did by posting this article other than prove that Marianne is a more dedicated ally to our community than any of her opponents

Even if she's had positive interactions with a few individuals, it still doesn't discount the fact that she exploited the gay community during the crisis, such that it traumatized them and often blamed them for the disease:

 

Quote

Meanwhile, people like Guy-Bray, who came away from the AIDS crisis with a much more damning image of Williamson, chafe at the lighthearted tributes to her. Guy-Bray remembers Williamson and Hay as “essentially faith healers, getting dying men to concentrate on their spiritual well-being rather than on activism.” He recalls reading a lot of coverage of Williamson in gay media during the AIDS crisis. She “taught that the virus killing all those men was to some extent a result of their own inner conflicts and traumas and so on,” Guy-Bray told me. Because she made a fair bit of money off of her books and workshops, “everyone I knew thought she was a grifter.”

7 hours ago, Bloodflowers. said:

 

 

You two need to give it up :deadbanana2: :toofunny2:

 

That's your only response when people approach you with facts? :ahh:

Posted
19 minutes ago, Jotham said:

Even if she's had positive interactions with a few individuals, it still doesn't discount the fact that she exploited the gay community during the crisis, such that it traumatized them and often blamed them for the disease:

 

That's your only response when people approach you with facts? :ahh:

 

"Facts" I have to laugh :ahh:

 

I guess you could say I am like Karine, I can't take your aura in this thread seriously :thing:

 

Posted

okay marianne is iconique. but what are our honest thoughts about what she said about AIDS? 

i see a lot of my twitter oomfs who are also gay stanning her and I'm having a hard time being a full stan

Posted
32 minutes ago, ebaby said:

okay marianne is iconique. but what are our honest thoughts about what she said about AIDS? 

i see a lot of my twitter oomfs who are also gay stanning her and I'm having a hard time being a full stan

What did she say about aids ?

Posted

The french press secretary girl is a disgrace

Posted
2 hours ago, Sergi91 said:

What did she say about aids ?

The very controversial stance that *checks note* prayer is important to religious people. 

Yes, shocking. Disgusting. Wild. Crazy. Kooky!

 

 

Posted
On 3/8/2023 at 5:50 AM, Jotham said:

Even if she's had positive interactions with a few individuals, it still doesn't discount the fact that she exploited the gay community during the crisis, such that it traumatized them and often blamed them for the disease:

Quote

Meanwhile, people like Guy-Bray, who came away from the AIDS crisis with a much more damning image of Williamson, chafe at the lighthearted tributes to her. Guy-Bray remembers Williamson and Hay as “essentially faith healers, getting dying men to concentrate on their spiritual well-being rather than on activism.” He recalls reading a lot of coverage of Williamson in gay media during the AIDS crisis. She “taught that the virus killing all those men was to some extent a result of their own inner conflicts and traumas and so on,” Guy-Bray told me. Because she made a fair bit of money off of her books and workshops, “everyone I knew thought she was a grifter.”

 

Terrible. Once a grifter always a grifter. 

Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, Icarus said:

Terrible. Once a grifter always a grifter. 

How can you still be posting on here, 7 years later, from the UK with the sole intent of ensuring Americans never get universal healthcare? :deadbanana4: What incentive do you have as a British person to oppose M4A that you've dedicated an online persona to posting misinformation and slander against anyone who suggests being poor shouldn't mean you die? How fragile are your politics that a niche protest candidate inspires this level of malice & lying?

 

Literally everything bitter 2016 Clintonites (supporting an American politician from thousands of miles away :deadbanana4:) have posted about Williamson is objectively false. It literally takes maybe 5 minutes of fact-checking to find this out. How could she have told those living with AIDs to not take their medication when the alleged quote that claims to say this is from a time when there was literally no medical treatments for AIDs? How could she tell people not to take something that had yet to be invented? The math ain't mathing. How dumb do you believe the average American to be to fall for such nonsensical slander? 

 

Are your politics that shallow and your contempt for working class Americans that deep that your boutique electoralism is more about slandering anyone who challenges right-wing Dems instead of actually engaging with arguments to their policy positions? Though I understand why you wouldn't. It'd be obscene for someone who fully enjoys the wonders of free healthcare to attack someone trying to bring such to America. :skull:

 

Spoiler: It's grifting to support politicians in other countries who'd never receive your vote if they ran as politicians in *your* country. And something tells me you're not voting for any UK party trying to dismantle the NHS anytime soon. :celestial5: If you find Biden's attacks on universal healthcare correct, be an actual adult and articulate a defense for private healthcare. Don't lie when you have no argument.

Edited by Communion
Posted

The PS's comment wasn't smug? They just don't have a response lol.

Posted

You'd think a country that prides itself on freedom of religion would not have religious people attacking someone so boldly for theirs but alas, with everything, the majority abuses the numbers to silence the minority when their beliefs are the nuttiest of all.

Posted

Could a Biden supporter enlighten us as to why he refuses to support the below?

 

FqZrPh5XgAEC2mE?format=jpg&name=900x900

 

Posted
18 hours ago, GraceRandolph said:

 

whew :clap3: stan Marianne!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.