Jump to content

Ariana Breaks Paul McCartney's Record


Recommended Posts

Posted

she lazier than Rihann this stage and the songs is horrid 

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Jude

    15

  • Lovett

    13

  • duybeeGAshantiGA

    11

  • Dialamba

    2

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
1 hour ago, MrLovett said:

The term 'duet' doesn't specify how artists are credited. :skull: It's literally just a song with two artists. Ari is super successful, so why are her fans making records up like this? :deadbanana2:

 

7 hours ago, suburbannature said:

This specific-ass record and two of those aren't even duets :deadbanana2:

 

1 hour ago, Doogle said:

This is such a made up record :lmao: 

 

4 hours ago, fridayteenage said:

 

:clap3:

 

5 hours ago, BlueTimberwolf said:

Distinction without a difference. You can't add someone onto a track after the fact and claim it is a duet.  

 

5 hours ago, BlueTimberwolf said:

This fan account is just wrong.  Rihanna has 7 number one collabs, and would be ahead of Ari no matter what the criteria is. Mods close this thread.  

 

6 hours ago, Jeremiah said:

I don’t get it then because Rihanna has way more #1 collabs than four

Why are you guys so bitter? File a complaint to Billboard coz they're the ones who "made up" this record. 

 

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, duybeeGAshantiGA said:

A record is a record. The 3 songs that Paul Cartney held the record for were with 2 main artists as well, NO fEaTUrE! 

Drag them. Billboard made this record, it's not fan-made.

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Jude said:

Drag them. Billboard made this record, it's not fan-made.

It is illogical though. :skull: Because an artist being credited as a feature on a song, as opposed to lead, doesn't suddenly not make it a duet. Congrats to her, but it just seems nonsensical. That's all. :michael:

Posted
19 minutes ago, MrLovett said:

It is illogical though. :skull: Because an artist being credited as a feature on a song, as opposed to lead, doesn't suddenly not make it a duet. Congrats to her, but it just seems nonsensical. That's all. :michael:

To you. You guys thought we made this record up when Billboard made it themselves.

Posted
Just now, Jude said:

To you. You guys thought we made this record up when Billboard made it themselves.

Yes, to me. I've just explained why. I did think it was made up by fans, because it doesn't logically make sense so it's surprising that Billboard would fabricate a record like this. But I've congratulated her nonetheless. :michael:

Posted
Just now, MrLovett said:

Yes, to me. I've just explained why. I did think it was made up by fans, because it doesn't logically make sense so it's surprising that Billboard would fabricate a record like this. But I've congratulated her nonetheless. :michael:

You've explained why yet that record will stay on Billboard's book.

Posted
Just now, Jude said:

You've explained why yet that record will stay on Billboard's book.

And it'll remain illogical. :michael:

Posted
31 minutes ago, Jude said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why are you guys so bitter? File a complaint to Billboard coz they're the ones who "made up" this record. 

 

 

Lmao so much for "AriAnA stAns' mAdE uP rEcoRd" :bibliahh: the embarrassment they brought to themself.

Posted
2 minutes ago, MrLovett said:

And it'll remain illogical. :michael:

To you.

Posted

They wanted to drag her so bad. And billboard came :ghostface:

Posted
2 minutes ago, duybeeGAshantiGA said:

Lmao so much for "AriAnA stAns' mAdE uP rEcoRd" :bibliahh: the embarrassment they brought to themself.

And now that I clocked them they still think they are above Billboard and won't accept this record. Such biased haters. :biblio:

Posted
1 minute ago, MrLovett said:

And it'll remain illogical. :michael:

How is it illogical :bibliahh: you are just being selective af bcuz you dont want to give it to Ari. If it's your fave u'd be singing a different song. 

 

There has always been a different between a Feature and a Main Artist. Thats why sometimes we have people being guests/ being credited as a Feature and sometimes people are credited as LEAD! It's even different in terms of paperwork. 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Jude said:

To you.

And those who understand what the term 'duet' means.

Posted
Just now, Dialamba said:

They wanted to drag her so bad. And billboard came :ghostface:

Even said "close this thread" LMAO!!!

 

1 minute ago, Jude said:

And now that I clocked them they still think they are above Billboard and won't accept this record. Such biased haters. :biblio:

Typical hater behaviors :ahh:

Posted
Just now, duybeeGAshantiGA said:

How is it illogical :bibliahh: you are just being selective af bcuz you dont want to give it to Ari. If it's your fave u'd be singing a different song. 

 

There has always been a different between a Feature and a Main Artist. Thats why sometimes we have people being guests/ being credited as a Feature and sometimes people are credited as LEAD! It's even different in terms of paperwork. 

:rip: I've stanned Ariana for years. I think this "record" is illogical and makes no sense and that has nothing to do with my appreciation and love of Ariana and her music.

 

Of course there's a difference between featured and lead credit, but not with the term 'duet'. It's still... a duet. That's why this record doesn't make any sense. I can't understand why you're both fighting so aggressively against this point. :deadbanana2:

Posted
Just now, MrLovett said:

And those who understand what the term 'duet' means.

So? In Billboard's book it means not including the feat. ones. If you don't agree with their record then make your own publishing company for music charts.

Posted
1 minute ago, MrLovett said:

And those who understand what the term 'duet' means.

Since I was little, I always understood the word "duet" as a song with a more balanced distribution or importance while being a feature means you just add sth to a song and you are not a main artist of that song. It's very simple.

Posted

Nobody says Snow On the Beach a duet between Lana and Taylor :bibliahh:

Posted
Just now, duybeeGAshantiGA said:

Since I was little, I always understood the word "duet" as a song with a more balanced distribution or importance while being a feature means you just add sth to a song and you are not a main artist of that song. It's very simple.

"Since you were little". :rip: Girl, please. Crediting varies from song to song - you can have an artist who is literally singing lead be credited as feature, or the reverse. Or you can not credit artists at all. That's why I think creating a "record" around this narrative is illogical. If there are two artists performing the song together, it's a duet. :michael: You don't need to agree, that's fine.

 

Just now, Jude said:

So? In Billboard's book it means not including the feat. ones. If you don't agree with their record then make your own publishing company for music charts.

Then they should specify that, because that's not what 'duet' means. That's literally all. There's no need for you to be throwing your toys out of your pram and screaming "haterzz!!!1" because I'm addressing that. It's really not that serious. :skull:

Posted
Just now, MrLovett said:

"Since you were little". :rip: Girl, please. Crediting varies from song to song - you can have an artist who is literally singing lead be credited as feature, or the reverse. Or you can not credit artists at all. That's why I think creating a "record" around this narrative is illogical. If there are two artists performing the song together, it's a duet. :michael: You don't need to agree, that's fine.

 

Then they should specify that, because that's not what 'duet' means. That's literally all. There's no need for you to be throwing your toys out of your pram and screaming "haterzz!!!1" because I'm addressing that. It's really not that serious. :skull:

Yes you are a haters coz you insist that this record is not acceptable despite being validated by the Bible themselves. A record is a record and should not be argued.

Posted
1 minute ago, Jude said:

Yes you are a haters coz you insist that this record is not acceptable despite being validated by the Bible themselves. A record is a record and should not be argued.

Get a grip. :skull: Not you calling Billboard 'the Bible'. :lmao: People call out Billboard for their inaccuracies and shady practices all the time. I'm literally discussing the record they've fabricated and how it doesn't make sense. That's not an attack on Ariana. Calm down.

Posted
Just now, MrLovett said:

Get a grip. :skull: Not you calling Billboard 'the Bible'. :lmao: People call out Billboard for their inaccuracies and shady practices all the time. I'm literally discussing the record they've fabricated and how it doesn't make sense. That's not an attack on Ariana. Calm down.

I'm calmed down? You're the ones who's been working hard here to invalidate someone's achievement. Again, a fact should not be argued so I'm not going to argue with you anymore. The record will stay. Period. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Jude said:

I'm calmed down? You're the ones who's been working hard here to invalidate someone's achievement. Again, a fact should not be argued so I'm not going to argue with you anymore. The record will stay. Period. 

It's quite clear you're not. :skull: I've congratulated her multiple times on the "record", but I still think it's illogical. Get over it. :coffee2:

Posted
1 minute ago, MrLovett said:

It's quite clear you're not. :skull: I've congratulated her multiple times on the "record", but I still think it's illogical. Get over it. :coffee2:

Gurl, you're the one who's exploding veins there. Don't project your negative energy to me. I'm as a calm as a meditating monk. :bibliahh:

 

The one who should get over here is you since this record will remain no matter how many times you said no. :sorry:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.