XAMJ Posted March 4, 2023 Posted March 4, 2023 america is headed for a divorce, its what the GOP wants. too bad the blue states bring in all the GDP growth
Communion Posted March 4, 2023 Posted March 4, 2023 And yet privileged gays will argue this is not genocidal language and that we should still be open to people asking questions about trans healthcare.
stjosephprey4us Posted March 4, 2023 Posted March 4, 2023 The thread title is not actually what he said, he was talking about the ideology not the people. However, it’s still giving Gilead
ClashAndBurn Posted March 4, 2023 Posted March 4, 2023 7 minutes ago, stjosephprey4us said: The thread title is not actually what he said, he was talking about the ideology not the people. However, it’s still giving Gilead If you do away with the "ideology" and the treatment that prevents people with gender dysphoria from taking their lives... what do you think happens next?
Contessa Posted March 4, 2023 Posted March 4, 2023 7 minutes ago, stjosephprey4us said: The thread title is not actually what he said, he was talking about the ideology not the people. However, it’s still giving Gilead The ideology is rooted in the existence of the people, so.. what now?
stjosephprey4us Posted March 4, 2023 Posted March 4, 2023 1 minute ago, ClashAndBurn said: If you do away with the "ideology" and the treatment that prevents people with gender dysphoria from taking their lives... what do you think happens next? That’s why I said “it’s giving Gilead” darling
Communion Posted March 4, 2023 Posted March 4, 2023 1 hour ago, stjosephprey4us said: The thread title is not actually what he said, he was talking about the ideology not the people. 1 hour ago, Communion said: And yet privileged gays will argue this is not genocidal language Never failed to be late down. Imagine if he had said "we need to remove homosexuality from public life".
Bears01 Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 Who actually likes these people? Him, Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, Tomi Lahren, Steven Crowder etc all give off MISERABLE and angry vibes, yet, according to conservatives, theyre beloved and idolized and all I can think is….why?
fauxtography Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 2 hours ago, stjosephprey4us said: The thread title is not actually what he said, he was talking about the ideology not the people. However, it’s still giving Gilead What is the difference exactly? Or are you just being an edgy loser for the sake of semantics?
GhostBox Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 I still can’t believe they are going full force with this stuff still. Especially after the public didn’t reward them in the mid terms when they made this one of their big issues 💀
CandleGuy Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 2 hours ago, Bears01 said: Who actually likes these people? Him, Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, Tomi Lahren, Steven Crowder etc all give off MISERABLE and angry vibes, yet, according to conservatives, theyre beloved and idolized and all I can think is….why? Because conservatives are miserable and angry. That's the whole idea. Things were better "the way they were". They blame progressives for the fact that they don't live the "American Dream". It's a bunch of rich people that have tricked a bunch of poor people into thinking the rich aren't the problem, the blue haired transgendered liberal is the problem.
Zylo Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 Conservatives will constantly move to debate the human rights of one victim to the next every time they lose. Obviously the hyper visibility of the internet plays a role, but any time people ask to just exist they pick a new victim. Recently of the same caliber it was homosexuals and gay rights/marriage; they lost that battle so they learned to shut the **** up. Now the hot topic of conservatives is trans people, and soon after they will hyper fixate on another when people stop caring enough to fill their pockets. What’s next, Enbys leading to the destruction of the nuclear family ? Thankfully people with common sense can see right through their little board game of human rights.
Price of Fame Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 52 minutes ago, GhostBox said: I still can’t believe they are going full force with this stuff still. Especially after the public didn’t reward them in the mid terms when they made this one of their big issues 💀 it's a losing political issue, but an easy grift
stjosephprey4us Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 1 hour ago, fauxtography said: What is the difference exactly? Or are you just being an edgy loser for the sake of semantics? I just don’t think it’s productive for us to exaggerate what was said bc that is literally what the “right” do, take things the “left”says out of context and blow them out of proportion in order to drum up resentment and anger. Obviously I don’t agree with what the man said, hence why if you have reading comprehension ( @Communion @ClashAndBurn @Contessa since you seem to lack the ability to read as well ) I mentioned “it’s giving Gilead” in my original post which (in case you don’t know) is a totalitarian conservative extremist murderous government in a fictional story about a misogynistic, racist, and homophobic-led society. So in no way do I think my original comment exhibited privilege or condoned what the man said. It’s honestly weird and “loser” (as you so kindly put it, I’m just regurgitating your own words to you) behavior to try to pick apart my response to find a way to be offended. All I was saying is OP @Armani? was being misleading with the title, making it seem as if someone quite literally said (not just implied, which I’m not arguing that it wasn’t his implication) that we need to go out and literally kill all trans people. What the man in the clip said was bad enough, without putting further words in his mouth. Also @fauxtography if you want to look for “loser” behavior, perhaps I can point you to @Communion (who I will now be muting bc this is like the millionth time they’ve tagged me in posts when I’ve never addressed them before in my life, and they always seems to have flamebait opinions on here) who thinks quoting their own posts is a cool and “edgy” thing to do
nadiamendell Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 "Transgenderism" is not an "ideology".... Jesus. Why are these people so ******* obsessed with trans people.... TRANS people... Literally such a small minority of people that are the most discriminated against in society. They are literally just trying to live their lives. I ******* cannot. This upcoming election season is going to be an all-out war... I can see it now. These politicians are pushing for it.
flashdagoat Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 (edited) ATRL is truly the Fox News of the left Nowhere did he call to exterminate transgender people, but does that matter? Of course not, because it makes for a baity headline to people who refuse to use critical thinking. Edited March 5, 2023 by flashdagoat
nadiamendell Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 5 minutes ago, flashdagoat said: ATRL is truly the Fox News of the left Nowhere did he call to exterminate transgender people, but does that matter? Of course not, because it makes for a baity headline to people who refuse to use critical thinking. Please tell us, ATRL user flashdagoat, what does eradicating "transgenderism" mean then exactly?
flashdagoat Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 (edited) 14 minutes ago, nadiamendell said: Please tell us, ATRL user flashdagoat, what does eradicating "transgenderism" mean then exactly? He specifically referred to transgenderism as an ideology. In other words, even if a man identifies as a transgender woman, as far as society and the law goes, that "identity" does not exist, is not accepted, and that person remains a man. It's really quite simple to understand what he's saying. The left just hates his opinion and thus loves to smear him and play dumb acting like they don't know what he means. No different from Fox News. Edited March 5, 2023 by flashdagoat
Communion Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 6 minutes ago, flashdagoat said: He specifically referred to transgenderism as an ideology. This is literally a fascist tactic. Nazis didn't view Jews as people. They viewed them as example of a "Jewish ideology" and that such ideology was inherently at odds with Christian life. Eventually it went from "Jewish bankers are poisoning our wells and bankrupting our people and thus we must reiect them from our communities and public life" to "Jewish people's existance is a threat against our society's and we must exterminate them". If people are not allowed to be inherently what they biologically are, how is that akin to living? This is the rhetoric literally used against gay people. "We hate the sin, not the sinner". Traits of identity are not ideologies. Being gay is not an ideology. Being trans is not an ideology. Being black is not an ideology. Being ethnically Jewish is not an ideology.
nadiamendell Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 18 minutes ago, flashdagoat said: He specifically referred to transgenderism as an ideology. In other words, even if a man identifies as a transgender woman, as far as society and the law goes, that "identity" does not exist, is not accepted, and that person remains a man. It's really quite simple to understand what he's saying. The left just hates his opinion and thus loves to smear him and play dumb acting like they don't know what he means. No different from Fox News. Besides the fact that transgenderism is not an "ideology", it is a state of being, what exactly do you think is involved with "eradicating" transgenderism? How do you "eradicate" it without eradicating transgender people? Your argument makes no sense.
flashdagoat Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 1 minute ago, Communion said: This is literally a fascist tactic. Nazis didn't view Jews as people. They viewed them as example of a "Jewish ideology" and that such ideology was inherently at odds with Christian life. Eventually it went from "Jewish bankers are poisoning our wells and bankrupting our people and thus we must reiect them from our communities and public life" to "Jewish people's existance is a threat against our society's and we must exterminate them". If people are not allowed to be inherently what they biologically are, how is that akin to living? This is the rhetoric literally used against gay people. "We hate the sin, not the sinner". Traits of identity are not ideologies. Being gay is not an ideology. Being trans is not an ideology. Being black is not an ideology. Being ethnically Jewish is not an ideology. Except transgenderism IS an ideology that has only become popularized in the last few decades. There are billions of people on this planet who consider Sam Smith a man and Elliot Page a woman and do not care what they "identify" as, because they believe in biological realities and discard all the extra fanfare introduced in the last 40 years or so. Do you agree with them, or even have to? Clearly not, but equating 99% of the human population's beliefs to Nazi fascism is a reach if I've ever seen one and a complete fallacy.
nadiamendell Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 11 minutes ago, Communion said: This is literally a fascist tactic. Nazis didn't view Jews as people. They viewed them as example of a "Jewish ideology" and that such ideology was inherently at odds with Christian life. Eventually it went from "Jewish bankers are poisoning our wells and bankrupting our people and thus we must reiect them from our communities and public life" to "Jewish people's existance is a threat against our society's and we must exterminate them". If people are not allowed to be inherently what they biologically are, how is that akin to living? This is the rhetoric literally used against gay people. "We hate the sin, not the sinner". Traits of identity are not ideologies. Being gay is not an ideology. Being trans is not an ideology. Being black is not an ideology. Being ethnically Jewish is not an ideology.
nadiamendell Posted March 5, 2023 Posted March 5, 2023 Just now, flashdagoat said: Except transgenderism IS an ideology that has only become popularized in the last few decades. There are billions of people on this planet who consider Sam Smith a man and Elliot Page a woman and do not care what they "identify" as, because they believe in biological realities and discard all the extra fanfare introduced in the last 40 years or so. Do you agree with them, or even have to? Clearly not, but equating 99% of the human population's beliefs to Nazi fascism is a reach if I've ever seen one and a complete fallacy. Transgender people have literally always existed. Please read a history book.
Recommended Posts