getinthezone Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 what makes a random kpop boygroup member a better singer than Celine Dion?
Riot Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 If "genius is transcendent" how is Donna Summer ranked lower than Taylor Swift or Ariana Grande? She literally pioneered a whole music genre.
Yawn Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 seems even more trollish but let me not give them any clicks
PlERRE Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 This is worst How are those KPOP acts listed even there?
Gui Blackout Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 Well they're right, good singer and good vocalist are different concepts. Being a good singer is not necessary hitting high notes and being technically perfect, it's more about being a performer, conveying emotion, etc. There were flaws in the list, but it's just: a list of someone's opinion. Don't need to make a big deal
Erreur2 La Nature Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 "This is the Greatest Singers list" That's even WORSE
suburbannature Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 Damage control. I mean, they’re still saying it’s about voices just incorporating factors like creativity, influence, etc. idk
Cryptique Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 The backtracking attempts if it aint based on vocals, then why is MJ so low or why is Madonna N/A?
Cryptique Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 Disrespect THE Celine Dion and y'all will feel the wrath of the GP
KillingYourCareer Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 So what is it about? Recent commercial success and online fan base size seem to have been major factors.
Johnny Jacobs Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 (edited) Not them making it worse like delete it and stfu Edited January 3, 2023 by Johnny Jacobs
Hephaestus Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 Not them digging an even deeper grave with that tweet
Into The Void Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 its just some random list by a publication that hasnt been relevant since the 2000s
pisuke Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 22 minutes ago, Cryptique said: The backtracking attempts if it aint based on vocals, then why is MJ so low or why is Madonna N/A? Haven't checked that list, but really??? This just invalidates this whole pamphlet existence. They are really trying to re-write music history, huh? That list is a bad joke that should have been publish on April Fools.
Mike91 Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 26 minutes ago, suburbannature said: Damage control. I mean, they’re still saying it’s about voices just incorporating factors like creativity, influence, etc. idk Then MJ would not be at 86, and I don't even care for him. Their excuse makes the list look even worse.
gustavothehuman Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 (edited) 35 minutes ago, Cryptique said: The backtracking attempts if it aint based on vocals, then why is MJ so low or why is Madonna N/A? They're not backtracking, that quote is literally in the beginning of the editorial The list is still a mess though Edited January 3, 2023 by gustavothehuman
KatyPrismSpirit Posted January 3, 2023 Posted January 3, 2023 what a weak form of damage control just own the fact that list sucks or dont say anything
Recommended Posts