discussion Cis woman gets harassed in bathroom by transphobe who thinks she's trans

[Headlock]

31 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

I have no idea what you are even trying to say, sorry

Exactly, that is the issue 

[Mobility Mary]

3 minutes ago, Headlock said:

Exactly, that is the issue 

You can always try to start making sense

[Communion]

34 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

Who said that? I don't think you know what radical feminism is. How did you even reach the conclusion that the woman in the video is radfem?

No, you are being asked how you justify your radfem ideology with your defending of a person born female being harassed and attacked for not presenting in a way that patriarchy claims is the only way to present as female.

 

A woman entered a space you claimed is meant to be a safe-haven for females. She was accosted and harassed because her natural body failed to meet signifiers determined by patriarchy to be "womanly". 

 

To try and brush off this woman's reality and how it represents the fail of your GC viewpoint, you claimed it was staged. You're trying to deny the reality that, as a cis woman, she was attacked and threatened for being n a women's bathroom by another cis woman because her natural body did not meet the apparent-societal and patriarchal standards of "female". 

 

Why do you want to silence women and their suffering to promote your backwards ideology as a radfem? 

Edited October 30, 2022 by Communion

[Mobility Mary]

3 minutes ago, Communion said:

No, you are being asked how you justify your radfem ideology with your defending of a person born female being harassed and attacked for not presenting in a way that patriarchy claims is the only way to present as female.

 

A woman entered a space you claimed is meant to be a safe-haven for females. She was accosted and harassed because her natural body failed to meet signifiers determined by patriarchy to be "womanly". 

 

To try and brush off this woman's reality and how it represents the fail of your GC viewpoint, you claimed it was staged. You're trying to deny the reality that, as a cis woman, she was attacked and threatened for being n a women's bathroom by another cis woman because her natural body did not meet the apparent-societal and patriarchal standards of "female". 

 

Why do you want to silence women and their suffering to promote your backwards ideology as a radfem? 

So basically you made up the idea that the woman in the video is radfem and you're basing your whole argument on it? What a weird thing to do lol

[Communion]

10 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

So basically you made up the idea that the woman in the video is radfem and you're basing your whole argument on it? What a weird thing to do lol

Please stop making up nonsense to avoid answering the question. You're not going to be able to get out of the forum viewing you as an transphobe who hides her hatred of trans people under a concern for women. You literally got joked about in multiple threads as hating trans people. 

 

You got too comfortable and outed yourself as willing to sacrifice other cis woman who aren't overtly feminine for your transphobia.

 

Now, answer at least one of the 10 questions you're now dodging.

 

56 minutes ago, Communion said:

Why did you try and suggest on page 1 that the cis woman in the original video had to be lying about being accosted and threatened for having a small frame and short hair?

[Mobility Mary]

1 minute ago, Communion said:

Please stop making up nonsense to avoid answering the question. You're not going to be able to get out of the forum viewing you as an transphobe who hides her hatred of trans people under a concern for women. You literally got joked about in multiple threads as hating trans people. 

 

You got too comfortable and outed yourself as willing to sacrifice other cis woman who aren't overtly feminine for your transphobia.

 

Now, answer at least one of the 10 questions you're now dodging.

 

Omg no, the user Communion and another homophobic user think I'm transphobic, what will I ever do?

 

Anyway, if you don't have any indication of this woman being a radical feminist that means you are basing your whole argument on literally nothing. No one is dodging your questions, your questions simply don't make sense. You can't take a random af woman that you don't know anything about and pretend like she's a radical feminist to try and prove that radical feminism hurts women lol. I honestly don't know how you got this bizarre idea that radical feminists think that women need to be hyperfeminine and get boob jobs when radical feminists see makeup, plastic surgery and sexy clothing as a form of patriarchy lmao. I don't think you've done enough research on the topic, unfortunately.

[Communion]

2 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

Anyway, if you don't have any indication of this woman being a radical feminist 

Again, you're not worming your way out of this. Sis, you're going to be hounded until you are held accountable. It's either this or you thankfully know to never mention trans people again cause we will be reporting you. 

 

No one right now is talking about the perpetrator in the video.

 

We're talking about the fact that we know you to be a radical feminist and the fact that you tried to argue this video of a cis woman being harassed because it was perceived she was a trans woman was "staged".

 

Again:

Quote

Why did you try and suggest on page 1 that the cis woman in the original video had to be lying about being accosted and threatened for having a small frame and short hair?

What evidence do you have of this video being staged?

[Mobility Mary]

Just now, Communion said:

Again, you're not worming your way out of this. Sis, you're going to be hounded until you are held accountable. It's either this or you thankfully know to never mention trans people again cause we will be reporting you. 

 

No one right now is talking about the perpetrator in the video.

 

We're talking about the fact that we know you to be a radical feminist and the fact that you tried to argue this video of a cis woman being harassed because it was perceived she was a trans woman was "staged".

 

Again:

What evidence do you have of this video being staged?

Screaming

No need for these dramatics. Report me for what exactly? When did I say anything against trans people? You might be imagining things. When did I call myself a radical feminist? When did I claim it was staged? I really don't understand any of your arguments luv.

[Aethereal]

33 minutes ago, Communion said:

 

To try and brush off this woman's reality and how it represents the fail of your GC viewpoint, you claimed it was staged.

I am a little bit skeptical too that it might've been staged. 

Edited October 30, 2022 by Aristotle

[Communion]

1 minute ago, Mobility Mary said:

When did I claim it was staged?

 

18 hours ago, Mobility Mary said:

Looks staged

 

The radfem to alt-right anti-trans conspiracy theorist pipeline 

[DirtyPony87]

36 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

You can always try to start making sense

I don't think I've ever seen a user take L after L after L after L after L like you have in this thread. Maybe it's time to throw in the towel, just admit that you're transphobic, and call it a day. You and that xxxstylexclusive clown. 

[Stimulus]

Very disappointed to see transphobia on display on ATRL.

Edited October 30, 2022 by Stimulus
Grammar

[Mobility Mary]

3 minutes ago, Communion said:

 

 

The radfem to alt-right anti-trans conspiracy theorist pipeline 

So saying "looks stage" = "I have evidence of this being staged". You are overthinking that very simple sentence.

[Lovett]

18 minutes ago, Aristotle said:

I am a little bit skeptical too that it might've been staged. 

Based on what exactly?

[Communion]

9 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

So saying "looks stage" = "I have evidence of this being staged". You are overthinking that very simple sentence.

This is 4-chan level style of wordplay trolling. 

 

You: *make the accusation that the video looks staged*

 

Anyone with common sense: "There's no evidence that this is staged."

 

You: "Who said I said I had evidence it was staged?? I simply was pointing out it looks staged!!"

 

Serving "I'm not saying Sandy Hook was faked; I'm just saying some things look off!". 

 

How does someone get to hate fellow women, cis or trans, so much that they're willing to actively hurt the same cis women they claim they're fighting for and devolve into some halfway point of JK Rowling & Alex Jones. 

[Mobility Mary]

Just now, Communion said:

This is 4-chan level style of wordplay trolling. 

 

You: *make the accusation that the video looks staged*

 

Anyone with common sense: "There's no evidence that this is staged."

 

You: "Who said I said I had evidence it was staged?? I simply was pointing out it looks staged!!"

 

Serving "I'm not saying Sandy Hook was faked; I'm just saying some things look off!". 

 

How does someone get to hate fellow women, cis or trans, so much that they're willing to actively hurt the same cis women they claim they're fighting for and devolve into some halfway point of JK Rowling & Alex Jones. 

Your whole issue with my sentence is that you think this video proves that radical feminism harms women, so if you're not gonna explain how the woman in the video is a radical feminist I seriously have no idea what you even want me to say to you

[Aethereal]

1 minute ago, MrLovett said:

Based on what exactly?

They did not show the face of the woman's who was harassing. And the woman that was mistaken for being a trans child looks nothing like a child and is very feminine looking. I would be very shocked if this happened to me instead of being ready to record a video. And the security was her boyfriend.  IDK it's really staged or not.

 

ON the other hand the voice/tone seem to be very convicting that it was real.

 

[Communion]

19 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

Your whole issue with my sentence 

My issue with you is that are spreading misinformation on the authenticity of the video.

 

We already know your motive to do so because the video is self-evident of the way that radical feminism and "gender critical" theory only re-affirms sex-based stereotypes, as long criticized about "radical feminists" and their claim that their methods are the only way to go about abolishing sex-based oppression.

 

Your theory is that gender is harmful and that gender distorts why cis women are oppressed and that expanding the definition of sex via gender won't improve cis women's lives and instead make it worse. But you literally have evidence in front of you that trying to attack "gender" as a concept only further fuels sexist ideas on female sex.

 

The woman in the video, regardless of what her own views are or are not, since we cannot know, went on to mis-sex someone because of sexist, patriarchal ideas of cis women because she wanted to find proof that that someone's sex was not in alignment with their perceived gender identity, as your worldview claim makes.

 

Uh-oh sphagettio though, she attacked a cis woman with short hair and small frame. 

 

And all you can do is double-down and spread conspiracies to ignore that your worldview harms women. You're not abolishing sex-based oppression; you're helping stregthen it. 

Edited October 30, 2022 by Communion

[Communion]

12 minutes ago, Aristotle said:

They did not show the face of the woman's who was harassing. And the woman that was mistaken for being a trans child looks nothing like a child and is very feminine looking. I would be very shocked if this happened to me instead of being ready to record a video. And the security was her boyfriend.  IDK it's really staged or not.

 

ON the other hand the voice/tone seem to be very convicting that it was real.

 

Pushing anti-trans conspiracies about a video you clearly did not watch as this isn't true. 

[Aethereal]

2 minutes ago, Communion said:

Pushing anti-trans conspiracies about a video you clearly did not watch as this isn't true. 

I heard him say at the end that's my girlfriend.

Edited October 30, 2022 by Aristotle

[Arcadius]

More people should believe in beating up bigots.

[Mobility Mary]

10 minutes ago, Communion said:

My issue with you is that are spreading misinformation on the authenticity of the video.

 

We already know your motive to do so because the video is self-evident of the way that radical feminism and "gender critical" theory only re-affirms sex-based stereotypes, as long criticized about "radical feminists" and their claim that their methods are the only way to go about abolishing sex-based oppression.

 

Your theory is that gender is harmful and that gender distorts why cis women are oppressed and that expanding the definition of sex via gender won't improve cis women's lives and instead make it worse. But you literally have evidence in front of you that trying to attack "gender" as a concept only further fuels sexist ideas on female sex.

 

The woman in the video, regardless of what her own views are or are not, since we cannot know, went on to mis-sex someone because of sexist, patriarchal ideas of cis women because she wanted to find proof that that someone's sex was not in alignment with their perceived gender identity, as your worldview claim makes.

 

Uh-oh sphagettio though, she attacked a cis woman with short hair and small frame. 

 

And all you can do is double-down and spread conspiracies to ignore that your worldview harms women. You're not abolishing sex-based oppression; you're helping stregthen it. 

This whole essay only to prove you have no idea what radical feminism is. I am honestly confused where you are getting your information on radical feminism from and where these strange assumptions about me are coming from, but you sound like you are stuck in the 2013 era Tumblr.

[Communion]

Just now, Aristotle said:

I heard him say at the end that's my girlfriend.

You heard one of multiple men in the video at the end. She literally says in the 2nd video in the OP that her boyfriend was waiting for her to get out of the bathroom, and was waiting on a bench near-by. 

 

 

Even if you were genuinely confused and not trolling, it literally  takes two seconds to go to the woman's profile and find this *third* post where the story remains consistent again and she explains *again* that the harasser had her husband go get security, who then waited outside of the bathroom for both of them. And that her own boyfriend approached the entire group (security, the harasser, the harasser's husband, and her) when he saw her walk out.

[Aethereal]

1 minute ago, Communion said:

You heard one of multiple men in the video at the end. She literally says in the 2nd video in the OP that her boyfriend was waiting for her to get out of the bathroom, and was waiting on a bench near-by. 

 

 

Even if you were genuinely confused and not trolling, it literally  takes two seconds to go to the woman's profile and find this *third* post where the story remains consistent again and she explains *again* that the harasser had her husband go get security, who then waited outside of the bathroom for both of them. And that her own boyfriend approached the entire group (security, the harasser, the harasser's husband, and her) when he saw her walk out.

I did not see the second video.

 

[imabadkid]

It feels like we're going backwards tbh. And people don't talk enough about how transphobic some women are.