Gossip_Boy Posted October 4, 2022 Posted October 4, 2022 Why are people surprised lol. Velma has always been queer coded, they just couldn’t officially address her sexuality on screen because studios wouldn’t let them. Multiple people have talked about this in the past from James Gunn to Tony Cervone.
anti-bitch Posted October 4, 2022 Posted October 4, 2022 1 hour ago, Cruel Summer said: Do you also take issue with every fictional character in the history of child-oriented television who has a heterosexual partner, love interest, or spouse? 4 minutes ago, Oxy said: So being heterosexual was a problem? OT: people who will criticize it will be called homophobic but why can’t they create new characters? Cause they know how lazy they are and the only way to be inclusive is to take an established ip and shift it. Sorry that was a typo from me. That what Cruel Summer said was what I was trying to say. It's good to be against sexual depictions of any kind for children ofc, but Scooby Doo has only ever had the kind of innuendo that would fly over kids heads. And I'm sure this time will be no different. So it's just double standards to think that's ok if it's straight but not if it's gay. And Velma has always been queer coded so it only makes sense that she becomes queer canon now. James Gunn literally said Velma was gay in the 2001 script but the studio interfered.
anti-bitch Posted October 4, 2022 Posted October 4, 2022 8 minutes ago, Gossip_Boy said: Why are people surprised lol. Velma has always been queer coded, they just couldn’t officially address her sexuality on screen because studios wouldn’t let them. Multiple people have talked about this in the past from James Gunn to Tony Cervone. This! Some people here are just trying to be antagonizing for no reason.
manwhore Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 11 hours ago, Miichael said: Republicans when they hear this news
manwhore Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 (edited) 8 hours ago, Oxy said: So being heterosexual was a problem? OT: people who will criticize it will be called homophobic but why can’t they create new characters? Cause they know how lazy they are and the only way to be inclusive is to take an established ip and shift it. Who cares. Lol not fairy tale fantasy novels and cartoons being upheld to the Bible Edited October 5, 2022 by manwhore
Lovett Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 9 hours ago, Oxy said: OT: people who will criticize it will be called homophobic but why can’t they create new characters? Cause they know how lazy they are and the only way to be inclusive is to take an established ip and shift it. People who are criticising it know absolutely nothing about the character in the first place, which is why it's comical that they're being so loud about "established IP being changed". When it's actually nothing of the sort.
Jay07 Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 15 hours ago, Ricky Wilson said: We love performative/forced activism and woke propaganda I'm not surprised at you being a far right wing bigot
ahauntingnearu Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 (edited) 16 hours ago, Ricky Wilson said: We love performative/forced activism and woke propaganda You, a creep, as always OT: Velma is that *****.. been slaying me over and over again since childhood Edited October 5, 2022 by ahauntingnearu
est. in 90s Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 14 hours ago, Gossip_Boy said: Velma has always been queer coded Has she? In the actual series, she had a HUGE crush on Johnny Bravo and her and Shaggy had a thing at one point. It's clear she was retconned for this lol
Da Vinci Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 Not them making her date Shaggy just to keep her in the closet
Angelgrande Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 Queen also that movie was actually good outdid that flop SCOOB
Recommended Posts