Jump to content

Queen Elizabeth II laid to rest: 1926-2022


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, JoshSpears1805 said:

wtf , we saved the world from Hitler, you dont know the meaning of the word evil 

Kiiiiiiiii

 

Say thank you to the URSS for that.

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vermillion

    110

  • Daydream

    89

  • Apocalipstick

    46

  • Grumpy Cat

    34

Posted
1 hour ago, Teen Idle said:

I'm not gonna criticise those who are mourning her death because they're unaware. Once you see through the illusion of monarchy, you realise the suffering that the institution and its members are responsible for. But those who grew up with Ms Liz, especially in the pre-internet days, were essentially brainwashed into believing the monarchy was a force of good and a necessary part of society. I'm not going to change my Grandma's worldview by telling her the atrocities the Queen and the Royal Family are responsible for at this time when she's mourning the only constant throughout her life, who she believed to be good based on what she was taught. The monarchy was the glue that kept British society together in lieu of religion towards the end of the 20th century. 

 

I also find it hard to not have sympathy for the family themselves as it's essentially a cult. The kids don't choose to be born into that family, and they're brainwashed and don't get to have normal socialisation with their peers. Good on Harry for getting out, but that took an outsider who could recognise the toxic dynamics at play within the family. 

 

Hopefully, as a nation, we can become less attached to the concept of monarchy and take a more critical approach to their place in society. I understand why people are angry at the royal family for their role in causing mass suffering, and also the lack of responsibility they've taken for it. But the jingoistic mentality of some of the comments in here is the exact same mentality of the royal family and their supporters.


Megan is a toxic entity and only cares about her gain.

 

Harry won nothing with MeGain.

JoshSpears1805
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nicholai said:

Kiiiiiiiii

 

Say thank you to the URSS for that.

incorrect, to start with USSR entered the war on Germanys side, invaded Finland , allowed the Germans to massacre Warsaw

 

history is much more complex than simple evil and good countries, if you studied it you would realise   I had the benefit of studying lots of history at school

Posted
9 minutes ago, JoshSpears1805 said:

wtf , we saved the world from Hitler, you dont know the meaning of the word evil 

Stalin did too, does that make him good? Think not

Posted

Rest In Piss, Monster

Posted
9 minutes ago, JoshSpears1805 said:

the queen is oved from all over Africa, my mothers family are from Nigeria where they are mourning her passing 

 

in Hong kong there is a movement to rejoin us away from china 

Are you ShakiShaki? the one user who said "3rd world countries deserved to be colonized because they can't manage their own resources". Because you sound exactly like him, and he hated China and keep licking UK ass. :deadbanana4:

 

If it's true why the hell the mod not permaban for something I would say the most stupid dumbest thing I've ever read on ATRL :deadbanana4:

Posted
2 minutes ago, IceBreaker said:

Stalin did too, does that make him good? Think not

Stalin killed just as many people as Hitler, they are both rotting in the deepest pit of hell

 

The Queen, who inherited an empire which then rapidly dissolved, is not on the same level :rip: This thread is serving unhinged 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Cloröx said:

Are you ShakiShaki? the one user who said "3rd world countries deserved to be colonized because they can't manage their own resources". Because you sound exactly like him, and he hated China and keep licking UK ass. :deadbanana4:

 

If it's true why the hell the mod not permaban for something I would say the most stupid dumbest thing I've ever read on ATRL :deadbanana4:

No idea what all this mess is about but it's well-known that the vast majority of Hong Kongers did not want to rejoin China and would have rather stayed with Britain.

Posted
12 minutes ago, hétérosexuelle said:

Megan is a toxic entity and only cares about her gain.

 

Harry won nothing with MeGain.

Harry won love, family and happiness with *Meghan. You and the other pressed children can stay mad about it.

Posted
12 minutes ago, hétérosexuelle said:


Megan is a toxic entity and only cares about her gain.

 

Harry won nothing with MeGain.

I can't comment on that, I know very little about her. All I know is that Harry got out of the system 

Posted
13 hours ago, Kassi said:

Girl when the Queen is relegated to a chapter in a middle school history books, AIWFCIY will still be spinning every year around the globe.
 

Point is, there are different ways to become a legend. Don’t know why that user tried to turn it into a competition. :giraffe:

And how is that not the much better situation? 50 years from now songs from our time will be relegated to nostalgia streams while the queen will forever be the actual important figure. Jesus. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Protocol said:

Stalin killed just as many people as Hitler, they are both rotting in the deepest pit of hell

 

The Queen, who inherited an empire which then rapidly dissolved, is not on the same level :rip: This thread is serving unhinged 

I wanted to point out that JUST because somebody is against nazism that doesn't make you good.

Posted

All these Trisha memes on Twitter and Tiktok :deadbanana2::bibliahh:

Posted
31 minutes ago, Nicholai said:

It is always surprising to me how unaware british people (and people from other imperialist nations like France and US) are of how their country are seen from the outside and especially in third world countries. AND particularly in countries who are/were victims of that imperialism.

 

Hope this thread shows them the painful truth. 

Except for Argentina, Latin America also doesn't really know a lot about the UK past. Everyone here is acting like Jesus has died. 

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, MrLovett said:

Harry won love, family and happiness with *Meghan. You and the other pressed children can stay mad about it.

They certainly will get a divorce soon enough, I am sure of it. 
 

He won a pathological liar, z-list actress climber, self-indulgent empty shell dummy— who’s only capable of loving herself.

 

LOVING the current floppage of her podcast and reports of how their brand she was trying to build is now worthless


MeAgain! is OVER

:pool:

Edited by hétérosexuelle
Posted
14 minutes ago, Cloröx said:

Are you ShakiShaki? the one user who said "3rd world countries deserved to be colonized because they can't manage their own resources". Because you sound exactly like him, and he hated China and keep licking UK ass. :deadbanana4:

 

If it's true why the hell the mod not permaban for something I would say the most stupid dumbest thing I've ever read on ATRL :deadbanana4:

I am pretty sure they are two different people. (One's a Britney stan, one's a Shakira stan). I assume Shaki is perma-banned.

 

____________

I am curious as to how they teach colonial history in your country. Down south over here, it was done in a very neutral manner. The British colonial masters seemed very benign, based on how the history textbooks are written, and I think people in my country never bothered to research more anyway. In any case, we were never plundered as terribly as South Asia and Africa, which leads to a bit of apathy. 

Posted

From The Guardian's live tracker

 

 

The economic picture as King Charles III takes the throne has some similarities to the situation when his mother’s reign began in the 1950s, points out Professor Costas Milas, from the management school of University of Liverpool.

When King George VI died in February 1952, the UK economy recorded the following headline statistics (retrieved from the Bank of England’s millennium database): CPI inflation rate of 14.04%, unemployment rate of 1.8%, BoE base rate of 2.5% and 10-year government bond yield of 3.84%.

70 years later, we face (again) double-digit inflation, interest rates on the rise and heading towards their February 1952 levels and, at the same time, very low unemployment...

Posted

Celebrating her death is kinda pointless. She lived a long, comfortable, and privileged life and now she gets to rest from whatever disease she had. She won, unfortunately. EVIL always wins.

Posted

From The Guardian's live tracker

 

Changing the nation’s coins and bank notes, following the Queen’s death, will be a slow process, as my colleague Robert Booth explains:

There are 4.5bn sterling bank notes in circulation with the Queen’s face on them, worth a combined £80bn. Replacing them with alternatives featuring the head of the new monarch is likely to take at least two years.

When the latest synthetic £50 notes were issued, the process of recall and replacement took the Bank of England 16 months. When the Queen acceded to the throne in 1952, the monarch was not featured on the banknotes.

That changed in 1960 when the face of Elizabeth II began to appear on £1 notes in an image created by the banknote designer Robert Austin, which some criticised as too severe.

An image of the new monarch would be agreed with Buckingham Palace. The Queen’s head also features on some $20 banknotes in Canada, on coins in New Zealand, and on all coins and notes issued by the Eastern Caribbean central bank, as well as other parts of the Commonwealth.

Coin designs may be changed more slowly if historical precedent is followed: it was common to have different monarchs in your wallet as the changeover in coins happened organically rather than through recall.

Posted
1 minute ago, Genius1111 said:

From The Guardian's live tracker

 

Changing the nation’s coins and bank notes, following the Queen’s death, will be a slow process, as my colleague Robert Booth explains:

There are 4.5bn sterling bank notes in circulation with the Queen’s face on them, worth a combined £80bn. Replacing them with alternatives featuring the head of the new monarch is likely to take at least two years.

When the latest synthetic £50 notes were issued, the process of recall and replacement took the Bank of England 16 months. When the Queen acceded to the throne in 1952, the monarch was not featured on the banknotes.

That changed in 1960 when the face of Elizabeth II began to appear on £1 notes in an image created by the banknote designer Robert Austin, which some criticised as too severe.

An image of the new monarch would be agreed with Buckingham Palace. The Queen’s head also features on some $20 banknotes in Canada, on coins in New Zealand, and on all coins and notes issued by the Eastern Caribbean central bank, as well as other parts of the Commonwealth.

Coin designs may be changed more slowly if historical precedent is followed: it was common to have different monarchs in your wallet as the changeover in coins happened organically rather than through recall.

We can only pray Charles expires quickly so that we can move onto William who at least has a nice jawline and kinda serves daddy sometimes

Posted
10 minutes ago, hétérosexuelle said:

They certainly will get a divorce soon enough, I am sure of it. 
 

He won a pathological liar, z-list actress climber, self-indulgent empty shell dummy— who’s only capable of loving herself.

 

LOVING the current floppage of her podcast and reports of how their brand she was trying to build is now worthless


MeAgain! is OVER

:pool:

She also seems to be capable of making your life an anger filled misery. :lmao: The way she's absolutely won in life - her children are now legally Prince and Princess, she has the love of her life, happiness and joy. Meanwhile causing people like you to have toxic meltdowns, whilst mattering in no conceivable way to her whatsoever. :redface:

 

We love to see it!

Posted
3 minutes ago, Genius1111 said:

From The Guardian's live tracker

 

Changing the nation’s coins and bank notes, following the Queen’s death, will be a slow process, as my colleague Robert Booth explains:

There are 4.5bn sterling bank notes in circulation with the Queen’s face on them, worth a combined £80bn. Replacing them with alternatives featuring the head of the new monarch is likely to take at least two years.

When the latest synthetic £50 notes were issued, the process of recall and replacement took the Bank of England 16 months. When the Queen acceded to the throne in 1952, the monarch was not featured on the banknotes.

That changed in 1960 when the face of Elizabeth II began to appear on £1 notes in an image created by the banknote designer Robert Austin, which some criticised as too severe.

An image of the new monarch would be agreed with Buckingham Palace. The Queen’s head also features on some $20 banknotes in Canada, on coins in New Zealand, and on all coins and notes issued by the Eastern Caribbean central bank, as well as other parts of the Commonwealth.

Coin designs may be changed more slowly if historical precedent is followed: it was common to have different monarchs in your wallet as the changeover in coins happened organically rather than through recall.

Another waste of taxpayers' money. :skull:

Posted
21 minutes ago, Genius1111 said:

I am pretty sure they are two different people. (One's a Britney stan, one's a Shakira stan). I assume Shaki is perma-banned.

 

____________

I am curious as to how they teach colonial history in your country. Down south over here, it was done in a very neutral manner. The British colonial masters seemed very benign, based on how the history textbooks are written, and I think people in my country never bothered to research more anyway. In any case, we were never plundered as terribly as South Asia and Africa, which leads to a bit of apathy. 

Hong Kong, Singapore and Penang are benefitting from your strategic location as main ports hence no wonder you guys experienced such development in infrastructures etc. But it's totally different situation in the rest of colonized territories, we get our resources sucked dry yet the developments are minuscule, here's where all the evil things happened. :monkey:

Posted

I just wanna say that the Queen did decolonise more nations under her reign than any other monarch ever did.  Blaming someone for what they inherited isn't really making a point, what she did with it on the other hand. Also, Imagine being one of the last few remaining people who are supportive of Meghan "I'm practically Mandela" (lost her) Marbles. The backlash her and her delusional mouth have received over recent months and it's increasing intensity is slowly but surely becoming irreparable. What Joan Collins said. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.