Jump to content

Queen Elizabeth II laid to rest: 1926-2022


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Pikachoo said:

I don't care if Charles III is the king. I don't care that Lizzy is dead.

 

she is still the current reigning Queen in my mind

 

ezgif-com-gif-maker-12.gif

well.. at least she still is somewhere  :gaycat6:

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vermillion

    110

  • Daydream

    89

  • Apocalipstick

    46

  • Grumpy Cat

    34

Posted

The cringe worthy centrists and neoliberals in here wanting people to play nice about the figurehead of the most murderous, cruel imperial force in history wahh wahh spare me your respectability politics because you’ve got rocks for brains and think of this dead woman as your spiritual grandmother.

 

Posted

 

ThE QuEeN dIdnT cOLonIiSe AnyOnE. But these vultures will keep passing their stolen wealth to each other, instead of returning it. and some of you really have the audacity to clutch your pearls cause some of aren't sad over her death. 

 

Posted
30 minutes ago, Nicholai said:

 

He read that hag to filth :ahh: The amount of likes :ahh:

 

OMG:bibliahh:

Posted
5 minutes ago, Bey Admired said:

The **** are some of you even talking about? The queen didn’t colonise anything :ahh: The queen hasn’t had any actual power her entire life. 

 

There is a separation of church and state that has been in place since she was crowned. The queen is the head of the church, and the government is in charge of the state. 

 

The queen didn’t wage wars, build empires, destroy countries, nor nation build. She was literally forced to be queen (and let’s be clear, she really had no choice as it was instilled in her from birth that her duty was to the crown) and led with nothing but grace and progressiveness for her time. If anything, she tried to build peace across the world through her work with the commonwealth. 

 

If we are all responsible for the actions of our ancestors and our country, then we’re ALL going to hell. 

This isn’t true. The Monarch is the head of the church and the state. The Queen is the one who officially appoints the PM and the government ministers, dissolves the parliament and signs bills into law. Up until 10 years ago, the queen could actually dissolve the Govt whenever she felt like it. There are constitutional boundaries to their power, but they are still head of the state. 
 

There’s such a weird phenomenon with royalists where they treat the royals as if they are innocent children.

Posted

Rest in peace

 

Midnights' lead single MV needs to be Queen themed and released soon for extra exposure

Posted
6 minutes ago, Both Sides Now said:

This isn’t true. The Monarch is the head of the church and the state. The Queen is the one who officially appoints the PM and the government ministers, dissolves the parliament and signs bills into law. Up until 10 years ago, the queen could actually dissolve the Govt whenever she felt like it. There are constitutional boundaries to their power, but they are still head of the state. 
 

There’s such a weird phenomenon with royalists where they treat the royals as if they are innocent children.

The queen has been a powerless figurehead all her life. The duties you lay out are all ceremonial, not involving any actual power. It's an institution that is an immense waste of taxpayer money & should be abolished, yes. But it just seems absurd to me to hold her responsible for every negative thing the UK did during her 70 year reign. She had absolutely no control or say over any aspect of any of it :skull:

 

I suppose I can respect that as a symbol of British empire, some will have some deserved antipathy towards her. I understand that. But twitter and half of this website are pretending as if she was some Hitler-esque figure, personally responsible for colonialism, genocide, the Falklands War etc. And that is ridiculous to me

Posted
14 minutes ago, discotitzz said:

The cringe worthy centrists and neoliberals in here wanting people to play nice about the figurehead of the most murderous, cruel imperial force in history wahh wahh spare me your respectability politics because you’ve got rocks for brains and think of this dead woman as your spiritual grandmother.

 

Yeah. As I said above, there’s such a weird phenomenon with royalists where they treat the royals like innocent children. Whenever they do anything wrong it’s like they’ve been caught with their hand in the cookie jar: “tsk tsk, another pedophile? Naughty royals!”

 

I think it’s linked to British exceptionalism. I think that WWII has given many British people a sense that they are “the good guys” in history and the royals are linked with that. Never mind that the royals were one American divorcé away from being Nazis! I think that it’s a cognitive dissonance for royalists when you tell them that a lot of people hate the royals and see them as evil :skull: same with Winston Churchill. 

Posted

I am watching a very good documentary about Queen Elizabeth on Hbo Max. It's called Queen of the World. 

Posted

Do some of y'all just get your politics and history knowledge from memes on Twitter? Because some of y'all are overestimating how powerful the monarchy is. :rip:

Posted

 

 

:jonny2:

Posted
2 minutes ago, Harrier said:

The queen has been a powerless figurehead all her life. The duties you lay out are all ceremonial, not involving any actual power. It's an institution that is an immense waste of taxpayer money & should be abolished, yes. But it just seems absurd to me to hold her responsible for every negative thing the UK did during her 70 year reign. She had absolutely no control or say over any aspect of any of it :skull:

 

I suppose I can respect that as a symbol of British empire, some will have some deserved antipathy towards her. I understand that. But twitter and half of this website are pretending as if she was some Hitler-esque figure, personally responsible for colonialism, genocide, the Falklands War etc. And that is ridiculous to me

Huh? I think you’re having an argument with the wrong person here :skull: That user said she wasn’t head of state and I corrected them. I didn’t say anything about whether she used those powers - but those powers were still there for most of her reign. If you are in possession of a loaded gun but never use it, you are still in possession of a loaded gun :rip: to say she was powerless is false. 
 

Again, I’ve never said that she is personally responsible for the British Empire. But she was the head for 70 years, upheld it, glorified it. It’s amusing to see people run around in circles to try to absolve her of any responsibility of British imperialism when you have admitted yourself that she is the symbol of it. 
 

As a person who grew up in a former colony of the British empire, these are my impressions of the monarchy. It’s understandable if you had a different one :michael:

Posted

This is all anyone was talking about at work today. :rip:

Posted

RIP Queen

Posted

noooo RIP queen an icon :jonnycat:

Posted

noooo RIP queen an icon :jonnycat:

Posted

The known transphobic user talking about karma dkdjdjdjd :rip: 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Both Sides Now said:

Huh? I think you’re having an argument with the wrong person here :skull: That user said she wasn’t head of state and I corrected them. I didn’t say anything about whether she used those powers - but those powers were still there for most of her reign. If you are in possession of a loaded gun but never use it, you are still in possession of a loaded gun :rip: to say she was powerless is false. 
 

Again, I’ve never said that she is personally responsible for the British Empire. But she was the head for 70 years, upheld it, glorified it. It’s amusing to see people run around in circles to try to absolve her of any responsibility of British imperialism when you have admitted yourself that she is the symbol of it. 
 

As a person who grew up in a former colony of the British empire, these are my impressions of the monarchy. It’s understandable if you had a different one :michael:

Yeah I gotcha, it wasn't necessarily directed at you even though I quoted you. I'm no fan of the monarchy either and I'll be doing some activism in my country's push to become a Republic. I have no wish for King Charles to be our head of state, I think it's time for Australia to move on :deadbanana2:

 

I have just felt that the reaction today has been kind of disproportionate and it's unpleasant to see thousands of people joyfully celebrating the death of an old lady when they don't really understand the history or her role. It's just kind of a ghoulish twitter bandwagon

Posted
58 minutes ago, MardinBeksloy said:

Why can’t careless about your history when ours were filled by hundreds of years of suffering and pain cuz of your country’s greed to colonize the world henny. we still suffering from the result of your Queen’s involvement in colonization and oppression to independence movement so don’t be surprised we’re not sad that’s she dead. 

Ok but that’s in the past how about just moving on and letting it go?

Posted

It's kinda crazy when you think about the fact that we will never see a person as iconic as her again in history

Posted

 

2 minutes ago, Harrier said:

Yeah I gotcha, it wasn't necessarily directed at you even though I quoted you. I'm no fan of the monarchy either and I'll be doing some activism in my country's push to become a Republic. I have no wish for King Charles to be our head of state, I think it's time for Australia to move on :deadbanana2:

 

I have just felt that the reaction today has been kind of disproportionate and it's unpleasant to see thousands of people joyfully celebrating the death of an old lady when they don't really understand the history or her role. It's just kind of a ghoulish twitter bandwagon


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_prerogative_in_the_United_Kingdom
 

Actually I’m wrong the powers that were taken away in 2011 were reinstated this year. So yeah, the monarch can actually dissolve parliament when they want :skull: 
 

But I understand, I’m not gleeful over her death either. It’s just my country’s history with the British Empire is less pleasant than Australia’s so it’s still more antipathy on my side, as you said :laugh: 

 

Here’s to an Australian Republican! :lee2:

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Itz_Dani! said:

Ok but that’s in the past how about just moving on and letting it go?

im bad with reading tone so plz dont tell me this is a serious reply :rip:

Posted
2 hours ago, Nicholai said:

 

He read that hag to filth :ahh: The amount of likes :ahh:

 

I love my country so much :bibliahh:

Posted

 

 

Posted

These colonialism defenders just STFU!

 

uBU2p9.thumb.gif.44d945387179c04bace0d40

 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.