discussion GOP rep votes against gay marriage protection, then attends son's gay wedding

[Gui Blackout]

 

Edited July 26, 2022 by Gui Blackout

[SapphireSky]

Fat bastard

[Rev8]

Hope his son kicked him OUT

[305]

This just proves how these people vote only for themselves, to be against the other parry. This isn't about helping the American people, its about winning. 

[Gottasadae]

Just now, 305 said:

This just proves how these people vote only for themselves, to be against the other parry. This isn't about helping the American people, its about winning. 

This 

[KillingYourCareer]

2 minutes ago, 305 said:

This just proves how these people vote only for themselves, to be against the other parry. This isn't about helping the American people, its about winning. 

Well said

[A Bomb]

Makes the son look bad. You really going to let him partake in this celebration. He just systematically voted against it. 

 

Republican hypocrisy isn’t a new concept. They have been shameless about it for decades. The faux intellectualism as if calling out their hypocrisy is a new political insight.   

[spree]

honestly, my father would do the same.  He loves me and all, but he would vote against my interests in a heartbeat.  So would my mother.  They are just set in their ways cuz of religion and that won't change in their lifetimes.

[Elusive Chanteuse]

12 minutes ago, A Bomb said:

Makes the son look bad. You really going to let him partake in this celebration. He just systematically voted against it. 

 

Republican hypocrisy isn’t a new concept. They have been shameless about it for decades. The faux intellectualism as if calling out their hypocrisy is a new political insight.   

His son is probably a Republican. They don't care about other gays either. 

[Bang Up]

33 minutes ago, 305 said:

This just proves how these people vote only for themselves, to be against the other parry. This isn't about helping the American people, its about winning. 

I don't disagree, but on the flip side the argument could be made that he's actually voting against what he wants and voting for what his constituents want, which is what a politician is supposed to do. However, I don't know what district this guy is from and how his constituents view gay marriage.

 

I believe it's most likely what you said, though.

[Buddy]

25 minutes ago, A Bomb said:

Makes the son look bad. You really going to let him partake in this celebration. He just systematically voted against it. 

 

Republican hypocrisy isn’t a new concept. They have been shameless about it for decades. The faux intellectualism as if calling out their hypocrisy is a new political insight.   

If I were the son, I'd allow my dad to attend then leak the story to the press.

[A Bomb]

24 minutes ago, Elusive Chanteuse said:

His son is probably a Republican. They don't care about other gays either. 

I hear that, but gay marriage not being federally protected would affect him directly 

 

11 minutes ago, Buddy said:

If I were the son, I'd allow my dad to attend then leak the story to the press.

Wait. Does his constituents know he has a groomer son? 

[Planet Mars]

There are a bunch of republican gays who are MAGA types so I won't be surprised if his son is one of them. Regardless, we all know most of them vote with their party, not with their common sense so yeah.

[RunUpDoneUp]

American exceptionalism is believing you can politically oppose something and someone and still be respectful to them when it's their very identity. Truly a country of brainrot and casual evil.

[Bloodflowers.]

Me when oposing religion but celebrating Christmas each year teas

 

 

[Beyonnaise]

That pic  Speaks a thousand words

[James_Dean]

That's so ****ed 

[harwee]

Laws don't apply to these ****er. Their party affiliation secure their bags probably the honeymoon as well.

These don't give a shit about anything but hop on the next hot topic to keep their names on attendance list of "doing something".

 

 

[heckinglovato]

Many people are not opposed to gay marriage, but believe the issue should be left to each state rather than mandated on the federal level.

 

I don't agree with that viewpoint of course, but we don't know how his dad may have voted today if he was a state representative rather than a federal one. 

[D_Man3379]

This makes the son look bad more than anything.

 

Shows how lowly he thinks of his own marriage that it doesn’t deserve protection from being taken away.