A Bomb Posted July 13, 2022 Posted July 13, 2022 Quote It’s not clear if Democrats will spend money to amplify the attack on TV like they have in other races across the country. Officials at the state party did not respond to requests for comment, and outside groups like the Democratic Governors Association have yet to spend money that way. But the missive signals how aggressively the party is engaging in GOP primaries this year. In next week’s GOP primary for governor in Maryland, for example, the Democratic Governors Association has outspent term-limited Republican Gov. Larry Hogan’s preferred successor with messaging that could boost another Trump-backed candidate. Where is the funding for local elections in states where abortion rights are in danger?
Communion Posted July 13, 2022 Posted July 13, 2022 SHE LITERALLY SAYS GAY AND TRANS PEOPLE ARE DEMONIC PIED PIPER IS HILLARY CLINTONS WORST LEGACY
JC. Posted July 13, 2022 Posted July 13, 2022 Lmao, they are doing this because she would be an easy candidate to go against in November. Also, don’t generalize the Dems, because there are some decent ones out there. Quote But not all Democrats are aligned on the strategy, and some acknowledge Mayer’s concern as valid — that elevating fringe candidates could undercut their argument about the mortal threat these Republicans pose to democracy. Michigan state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, a Democrat who went viral on social media and gained a national following after she framed Republican colleagues as hateful and extreme on cultural issues such as LGBTQ rights, told NBC News she didn’t think her party should seek to elevate Republicans they see as less electable in the fall.
Bears01 Posted July 13, 2022 Posted July 13, 2022 You would think this disaster of a political party would have learned their lesson after propping up Trump, but nope if this backfired, it’d be well deserved
A Bomb Posted July 13, 2022 Author Posted July 13, 2022 1 minute ago, JC. said: Lmao, they are doing this because she would be an easy candidate to go against in November. Also, don’t generalize the Dems, because there are some decent ones out there. Yes, because we clearly have no evidence or literal elections of this strategy back-firing. She gets the nom then what? The gay, and trans panic that right wing media has fixated on for almost a year just goes away, and the Dem candidate wins? Gay Republicans are being called groomers ( ), but somehow this bigot a liability to her party in a general election? What!
Communion Posted July 13, 2022 Posted July 13, 2022 1 hour ago, JC. said: Lmao, they are doing this because she would be an easy candidate to go against in November. I need you to read this article in full: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2016-donald-trump-214428/
Thuggin Posted July 14, 2022 Posted July 14, 2022 Democrats, who purport to care about marginalized groups, are willing to gamble with our livelihoods in order to increase their chances of winning elections, which has already been proven to backfire. This strategy also rewards the extreme far right by showing that, actually yes, being as fascist as possible is the way to win the nomination as a Republican nowadays.
rihannabiggestfan Posted July 14, 2022 Posted July 14, 2022 (edited) Extremely braindead of Dems to do that considering that that's LITERALLY HOW TRUMP WAS ELECTED, but wbk that they're not smart. Edited July 14, 2022 by rihannabiggestfan
Recommended Posts