Jump to content

JK Rowling praises anti-trans pundit who catfished trans teens for photos


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Miichael said:

Ignoring her would be nice, but unfortunately her actions are having real damaging consequences

Agreed. I think she’s particularly dangerous too because people saw her + HP as huge icons for ~liberal millennials~ for a long time. 5-6 years ago people would’ve been praising her and writing Buzzfeed articles about her ~snarkiest takedowns~ of the types of right wing nutjobs she is now aligned with. People eat up this sort of shift and thinks it validates their own transphobia while still being a “good person” because they see it from someone they looked up to. Or they “see her making some valid points,” and we know where that line of thinking eventually leads…

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Bey Admired

    5

  • Communion

    4

  • Headlock

    4

  • Bang Up

    3

Posted
1 hour ago, IvyTower said:

Let me guess she's selling peddling a new book and is going to use the safety of trans people to get the publicity and then call trans people a privileged class. 

 

EDIT: Just checked her twitter and you can't make this stuff up she's promoting her next book :deadbanana4:

Relax, i doubt she needs that to sell a book, she's already sold millions. She's just obviously way too obsessed with trans people, every other post of hers in about trans people. 

Posted

She's been spiraling for too long. She'll have a massive meltdown anytime now.

Posted

Similar to when Trump was in office, and to try and be productive, I'm mentally more in the space of tracking action, not words. Words affect individual acts of transphobia those accounts have tracked, yes, but to compile all of those mentally would be too much for me. 

 

To that end, Rowling's home of the UK (still, I believe?) seems to be imploding politically at the moment so I haven't really followed trans legislation there. 

 

As far as Matt Walsh is concerned, I recalled recently reading ongoing legal action against him, and not just for this documentary. Plenty of legal folks in the States track him almost daily for action and I know because I follow some of them. 

 

Same goes for the newly revealed Libs of TikTok account whose targeted businesses have mounted a significant pushback (even in rural red areas) because they now have national attention. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, RainDreamer said:

Relax, i doubt she needs that to sell a book, she's already sold millions. She's just obviously way too obsessed with trans people, every other post of hers in about trans people. 

Sis her last villain was literally a trans woman :deadbanana2:

Posted

A vile sad and desperate old woman causing unnecessary hate for her own amusement and bigotry 

 

I grew up with the Harry Potter series, an escape that gave me such joy as a child. I know you’re supposed to remove the artist from the art and not let personal beliefs tarnish the work that was created, but I really struggle to watch and enjoy Harry Potter now. She’s personally going after my community, a community that has done her no ill will. This vendetta is disgusting and I wish she would just fade into oblivion 

Posted

her obsession with trans issues is worrisome :deadbanana: 

 

i saw the documentary and while the it did hit some good points in regards to the potential side effects of hormone blockers, the framing of the interviews was not even trying to pretend to be impartial or truly investigative. the agenda was thick. i had no idea he set up a fake organization and tried to involve children in it. that's some slimy hypocritical mess.

Posted (edited)

It's one thing to not agree with people transitioning and mind your business about it but she's genuinely obsessed with trans people and it's just so f****** weird :rip:

Edited by bad guy
Posted

It's so boring now since she's clearly doing this to get attention. In a way I do kind of respect her tenacity at least, but she's doing too much with this daily instigating. Enough is enough. :skull: If only she used this energy to write better literature. 

Posted
4 hours ago, IvyTower said:

Sis her last villain was literally a trans woman :deadbanana2:

No it wasn't...what kind of fan fiction is this...:rip:

 

There was one side character who was linked to a cold case that had crossdressed in the past to drug women but there was no trans person in that book. 

Posted

Can somebody wingardium leviosa her ass out of this planet?

Posted

Many of us tried to warn people that she wasn't just "defending women" or "talking about biological sex". Gender critical ideology is a gateway to fascism. She's gone down the rabbit hole, she thinks she isn't as bad as him but happily promotes him to her millions of followers. 

Posted
6 hours ago, bleuwaffle said:

i saw the documentary and while the it did hit some good points in regards to the potential side effects of hormone blockers, the framing of the interviews was not even trying to pretend to be impartial or truly investigative. the agenda was thick. i had no idea he set up a fake organization and tried to involve children in it. that's some slimy hypocritical mess.

Did you know that puberty blockers have been used on cis children for decades to combat early puberty without any kind of backlash or upset. Are cis children immune from these side effects or were you perhaps just mislead by information presented out of context? Or maybe even just lies (I haven't seen the doc)?

Posted

Disgusting 

 

I’m glad I’ve never been a fan of HP

Posted

She's never giving in, huh? :biblionny:

Posted

Harry Potter is horrible and corny 

Posted

Ew not Matt Walsh :biblio:

 

He's so f*cking disgusting

Posted
44 minutes ago, Mr. Blue_Shirt said:

Ew not Matt Walsh :biblio:

 

He's so f*cking disgusting

For the LGBs who think her bigotry is only resulting in lifting up anti-trans views:

:mazen:

Posted

 

DDDDDD yes, catch them in their own hypocrisy.

 

Why are billionaires like Rowling such pieces of crap? You have a billion+ dollars. You could literally be doing anything you want, anywhere in the world, and instead you're sitting online attacking trans people. It's so pathetic.

Posted

She really went crazy. Poor hag.

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, chester said:

There was one side character who was linked to a cold case that had crossdressed in the past to drug women

*psst* JK thinks this is what trans women do *psst* :lakitu:

Edited by Headlock
Posted
27 minutes ago, Bang Up said:

 

DDDDDD yes, catch them in their own hypocrisy.

 

Why are billionaires like Rowling such pieces of crap? You have a billion+ dollars. You could literally be doing anything you want, anywhere in the world, and instead you're sitting online attacking trans people. It's so pathetic.

I don't think anyone that is able to accumulate that much wealth in one lifetime has much of a moral compass.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Headlock said:

I don't think anyone that is able to accumulate that much wealth in one lifetime has much of a moral compass.

I don't disagree, but as far as moral billionaires come, becoming a billionaire because of books and movies seems like the least bad way to do it... yet here she is being an absolute garbage person. I feel like when you get as famous and successful as Rowling, you need to find a way to still be a victim so you can "fit in" with others. Her idea of being a victim is that trans people are taking away her life as a woman or something. It's pathetic.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Bang Up said:

I don't disagree, but as far as moral billionaires come, becoming a billionaire because of books and movies seems like the least bad way to do it... yet here she is being an absolute garbage person. I feel like when you get as famous and successful as Rowling, you need to find a way to still be a victim so you can "fit in" with others. Her idea of being a victim is that trans people are taking away her life as a woman or something. It's pathetic.

I feel like if there had been some kind of therapeutic intervention early on into this mess she might have come out the other side, because clearly she has some personal issues that are driving this hatred, but being a billionaire means you don't have to answer to anyone, so unfortunately she slipped fully to the dark side.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.