Marla Singer Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 And yet the Anistans have been clinging to a streaming show, a streaming movie, and Instagram receipts these past couple of years.
Uncatena Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 spilled! btw, you’re extremely weird if you’re still hung up on Jolie vs Aniston. That was a misogynistic tabloid narrative that was spun to literally hate on successful women and still playing into that in 2022 is quite frankly worrisome x
TouchinFree Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 6 minutes ago, gugunikko said: But James Charles or those Paul brothers are stealing jobs from actor tho? Which is her point. like social media, YouTube give a platform and opportunities to a lot of POC which they would never get in Hollywood unless they are white and someone’s child. Isn't Charli's dad basically a notable CEO of Tiktok corporation though I think she meant that people can pretty much be famous for ..... ANYTHING now. Which is fair enough of course BUT it is devaluing actors . Hence making the influencer more important that the average actor that actually is famous for putting in work. I think all of our favs were literally hustling , toured malls , begged to be signed to some record label. And suffered years before their breakout. Now whilst they're icons . Having them put as the same category as some random girl making some weird waving gestures is just wrong. Any random influencer can easily get a record deal now. Them slowly becoming part of Hollywood is wrong in my opinion. The line could be drawn at the kardashian family.
gugunikko Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 3 minutes ago, TouchinFree said: Isn't Charli's dad basically a notable CEO of Tiktok corporation though I think she meant that people can pretty much be famous for ..... ANYTHING now. Which is fair enough of course BUT it is devaluing actors . Hence making the influencer more important that the average actor that actually is famous for putting in work. I think all of our favs were literally hustling , toured malls , begged to be signed to some record label. And suffered years before their breakout. Now whilst they're icons . Having them put as the same category as some random girl making some weird waving gestures is just wrong. Any random influencer can easily get a record deal now. Them slowly becoming part of Hollywood is wrong in my opinion. The line could be drawn at the kardashian family. being famous for nothing is a thing since old age. It’s not something that the kardasian introduced. Like in the 80s/90s they were billboard girls, socialite etc. And talented people get ignored all the time, in favor of less talented ones that are marketable. Also there’s no reason to gate keep who’s get to be in Hollywood. LOL
Sharapov Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 1 hour ago, flower moon said: she isn't much more talented than your average viral tiktoker, so yeah. she's actually a good actress. yall think only oscars matter 1 hour ago, nostalgia said: Says the Addison Rae of the Boomer Generation/Generation X she is jealous that Jolie has captured the TikTok and Instagram generation with her talent and beauty and philanthropy. will you ever stop comparing them like its 2006? its so ****** annoying and should be bannable already.
#Beautiful Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 18 minutes ago, ChapelHooker said: spilled! btw, you’re extremely weird if you’re still hung up on Jolie vs Aniston. That was a misogynistic tabloid narrative that was spun to literally hate on successful women and still playing into that in 2022 is quite frankly worrisome x
flower moon Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 2 minutes ago, Sharapov said: she's actually a good actress. yall think only oscars matter hrh collection outsold
Sharapov Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 23 minutes ago, ChapelHooker said: spilled! btw, you’re extremely weird if you’re still hung up on Jolie vs Aniston. That was a misogynistic tabloid narrative that was spun to literally hate on successful women and still playing into that in 2022 is quite frankly worrisome x its always that nostalgia person. its crazy.
dirrtydiana Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 1 hour ago, flower moon said: she isn't much more talented than your average viral tiktoker, so yeah. even if that were true what have they done to contribute to society? jen’s haircut “the Rachel” took the 90s by storm and still used today this isn’t showing her age. It’s showing y’all have no clue what it takes to be on a tv show for an entire decade with such replay value. it’s not only viral tiktokers who don’t have any business on a set, it’s a lot of “music” acts who don’t have business on a stage either. We’re all thinking it she only said it.
Erotic Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 She’s known as the friends lady, so maybe she should sit this one out — no payola’s Emmy will change that tragically awful show
LCTV Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 1 hour ago, TouchinFree said: She's absolutely right . And all the haters in this thread can choke. There was an organic process in becoming a prominent figure. Now it isn't about talent. And those people are idolized. but at the same time there's so much talent that HAS been snatched up because of the way things are now so.. she still sounds salty.
flower moon Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 (edited) 8 minutes ago, dirrtydiana said: even if that were true what have they done to contribute to society? jen’s haircut “the Rachel” took the 90s by storm and still used today this isn’t showing her age. It’s showing y’all have no clue what it takes to be on a tv show for an entire decade with such replay value. it’s not only viral tiktokers who don’t have any business on a set, it’s a lot of “music” acts who don’t have business on a stage either. We’re all thinking it she only said it. hairfluencer of the 90's a true contributor to society Edited June 13, 2022 by flower moon
lestat111 Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 1 hour ago, Jeremiah said: So she's complaining because average people gain fame by organic traction instead of being born in the industry with connections like her? this.
slayships Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 (edited) She needs to get off her high horse a lot of these B and C list actors from the 2000s have the same amount of talent as influencers. Edited June 13, 2022 by slayships
favorite crime Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 her only two hits in the past decade (murder mystery and the morning show) were from streaming services...and why is she acting like the only reason she has a career isn't because she's pretty
JustHoran Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 2 hours ago, FAN said: Absolutely adore her but isn’t her hit tv show on a streaming service? And she made MILLIONS off of it going to streaming
Mr. Blue_Shirt Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 Says someone who starred in the Netflix, Apple TV+ and HBO Max exclusive movies and shows. Who are you trying fool here Mrs. Green?
favorite crime Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 38 minutes ago, dirrtydiana said: even if that were true what have they done to contribute to society? jen’s haircut “the Rachel” took the 90s by storm and still used today this isn’t showing her age. It’s showing y’all have no clue what it takes to be on a tv show for an entire decade with such replay value. it’s not only viral tiktokers who don’t have any business on a set, it’s a lot of “music” acts who don’t have business on a stage either. We’re all thinking it she only said it. i'm gagging at you thinking a hairstyle is a valuable or relevant contribution to society. charli d'amelio made everyone do the renegade or savage dance or whatever for 2 years, literally the same level of contribution to society
Johnny Jacobs Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 Considering she's getting paid 2 mil an episode from a streaming service
DavidSMateus Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 2 hours ago, flower moon said: she isn't much more talented than your average viral tiktoker, so yeah. This
Communion Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 Not the backlash she's getting to this being how I learn she's a nepotism baby. Hollywood really is so incestuous and everyone the product of someone already famous.
Sharapov Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 25 minutes ago, Communion said: Not the backlash she's getting to this being how I learn she's a nepotism baby. Hollywood really is so incestuous and everyone the product of someone already famous. her parents were F list actors. it'd NEVER explain her becoming a list yall are such haters lmao
Recommended Posts