Jump to content

Are gendered languages problematic?


Revolution

Recommended Posts

As you know, in many languages, everything gets a gender.

 

dwREPtE.png

 

The gender they pick is sometimes biased / sexist. For example, in Arabic, the word for war (harb) is feminine while the word for peace (salaam) is masculine. 

 

Also, if there are 10 girls in a group and just 1 boy, you have to refer to the whole group as masculine because masculine dominates feminine ALWAYS.

 

It also shows how desperate humans are to enforce gender everywhere when even random ass objects must have a gender. :biblio:

 

So is it problematic ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably to some bored, jobless queers on the internet. The rest of us cope just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ice Cream Skies said:

Probably to some bored, jobless queers on the internet. The rest of us cope just fine.

This. Leave language alone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grammar structural rules are not offensive and problematic, they just exist and and are hardwired into the left side of our brains ever since we learn them from ages 1-2. Using them isn't even rational, it's a literal instinct (Steven Pinker).

 

Our brains separate people we see between men and women and some languages reflect that :mandown:

Edited by Chimichanga
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s not that serious :devil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Ice Cream Skies said:

Probably to some bored, jobless queers on the internet. The rest of us cope just fine.

:cm: 

 

Like who sits around and thinks of stupid **** like this? :deadbanana4:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything can be considered problematic so I guess so! :deadbanana:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if i speak :toofunny2:

 

i’ll just say that it can be depending on the rules of the language since masculine and feminine cam be seen as two extremes (for lack of a better word…”poles”?) when it comes to the gender expression spectrum 

 

i don’t think its like thee worst thing in the world but it would be interesting to examine

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

slavic languages have a neutral gender so our languages are not problematic :clap3: we love LGBT, come to Russia :clap3:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Chimichanga said:

Grammar structural rules are not offensive and problematic, they just exist and and are hardwired into the left side of our brains ever since we learn them from ages 1-2. Using them isn't even rational, it's a literal instinct (Steven Pinker).

 

Our brains separate people we see between men and women and some languages reflect that :mandown:

. This, it's not behavior you think about or have to correct, the most accommodating things we can do is add new pronouns for people outside of the gender binary set by those languages.

 

Hell, even calling them "gender" is kinda weird and stupid, all they are is noun classes, just a group of nouns that belong to the same class in terms of how they're used in the language. They're just called "masculine/feminine" because for some reason in most Indo-European this conception came to involve gender, there is nothing intrinsically gendered about the vast majority of nouns. There are a lot of European languages, particularly Slavic, which actually have 3 genders - Masculine, Feminine and Neuter, there are languages with as many as 10 different noun classes. It's legit completely arbitrary and being bothered by it is braindead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Ice Cream Skies said:

Probably to some bored, jobless queers on the internet. The rest of us cope just fine.

This 

it’s no big deal Lmao :hoetenks:

no wonder the inclusive language for non binaries flopped 

ain’t nobody got time to change their vocabulary overnight just because a few people demand it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like AOC complaining about Latinos not using Latinx :ahh:
Those people complaining about gendered language have a lot of time on their hands 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, shookspeare said:

slavic languages have a neutral gender so our languages are not problematic :clap3: we love LGBT, come to Russia :clap3:

:lmao: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People that care about things like this are the privileged class. Normal people are busy working and using whatever time they do have to make it from day to day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Ice Cream Skies said:

Probably to some bored, jobless queers on the internet. The rest of us cope just fine.

:cm:

 

Even if everything is gendered, at least in my language, you can always work around it and find ways to address people without enforcing gender 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even in English we have gendered words like he/she. And yes we should abolish them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16deKKJ.gif

 

No. Our language has been this way forever, there is no reason to change it. There's a massive difference when referring to people vs inanimate objects, nobody hears "la mesa" and genuinely thinks it's a female table :rip:

 

It's one thing to add options, even if most of us latinos dislike or use "latinx", for inclusion as it's always nice to have an option to be inclusive, I don't think that's the issue.

 

But what has definitely gotten and will continue to receive backlash, is trying to force us to speak a certain way or strip ourselves of our language & way of speaking because some bored group of people on the internet think we sit around all day thinking about gendered tables and houses :toofunny2:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ice Cream Skies said:

Probably to some bored, jobless queers on the internet. The rest of us cope just fine.

:cm:Deja el Español en paz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Electric chechnya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kim there’s people dying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Subzero said:

16deKKJ.gif

 

No. Our language has been this way forever, there is no reason to change it. There's a massive difference when referring to people vs inanimate objects, nobody hears "la mesa" and genuinely thinks it's a female table :rip:

 

It's one thing to add options, even if most of us latinos dislike or use "latinx", for inclusion as it's always nice to have an option to be inclusive, I don't think that's the issue.

 

But what has definitely gotten and will continue to receive backlash, is trying to force us to speak a certain way or strip ourselves of our language & way of speaking because some bored group of people on the internet think we sit around all day thinking about gendered tables and houses :toofunny2:

 

le mesa :ahh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.