Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Harry Styles makes it six weeks at #1 on the ARIA Singles Chart with As It Was

 

Debuts 12 songs in the Top 15, occupies 13/15 of it:

 

#1 (=) As It Was

#2 Late Night Talking

#3 Matilda

#4 Music for a Sushi Restaurant

#6 Little Freak

#8 Daylight

#9 Grapejuice

#10 Satellite

#11 Cinema

#12 Daydreaming

#13 Love of My Life

#14 Keep Driving

#15 Boyfriends

 

Quote

Topping the Albums Chart with Harry’s House, Harry Styles also picks up a sixth week at #1 on the Singles Chart with ‘As It Was’. On top of this, the other twelve tracks from the English artist’s third album have all entered this week’s chart: ‘Late Night Talking’ (#2), ‘Matilda’ (#3), ‘Music For A Sushi Restaurant’ (#4), ‘Little Freak’ (#6), ‘Daylight’ (#8), ‘Grapejuice’ (#9), ‘Satellite’ (#10), ‘Cinema’ (#11), ‘Daydreaming’ (#12), ‘Love Of My Life’ (#13), ‘Keep Driving’ (#14) and ‘Boyfriends’ (#15). Styles becomes the first artist to have 13 songs inside the Top 15 in one week. Previously, Taylor Swift had 13 songs between #1 and #25 in August 2020. The previous highest number of tracks by one artist in the Top 15 was Drake who had eight in September 2021.

Source

Posted

Wow Huge. How much did album do? Or are numbers not out yet 

Posted

:jonny:

 

KING of POP

Posted

8 Top hits in 1 week :skull:

Posted

ya idk how i feel about this type of thing

Posted

UK could've looked like this if it wasn't for it's absurd rules

Posted

This is huge CONGRATZ KING :clap3:

Posted (edited)

French charts have look like this for years 

 

last person I knew had a big debut was Billies debut

Edited by Katamari
Posted

He is smashing hard, we love to see it!

Posted

12 songs in the Top 15

 

:jonny5:

Posted

Holy sh*t, Harold :omg: 

Posted
3 hours ago, Billionaire said:

UK could've looked like this if it wasn't for it's absurd rules

It's not absurd though, album listening should not be conflated with the streaming of singles/individual songs taking off. It'd be terrible for the diversity of the charts and thus what artists are given spotlights etc

Posted

King of Indie music :jonnycat:

Posted
6 hours ago, Otter said:

It's not absurd though, album listening should not be conflated with the streaming of singles/individual songs taking off. It'd be terrible for the diversity of the charts and thus what artists are given spotlights etc

Charts are supposed to reflect the most listened songs in a week, if several album tracks were among the most listened to why should they be excluded. idk just doesn't make sense to me.

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Billionaire said:

Charts are supposed to reflect the most listened songs in a week, if several album tracks were among the most listened to why should they be excluded. idk just doesn't make sense to me.

Charts historically are reflected in 2 main forms 
Albums: Bodies of work that people are buying and listening to
Singles: Stand alone songs people are buying/listening to.

 

The singles chart is not supposed to reflect what album people are listening to, and the album chart is not supposed to reflect what singles people are listening to. Otherwise the inidividual charts become redundant and you might as well just have one. This is a problem with the streaming age, as albums are getting high sales based of people streaming a few singles and equally people scoring 10 "hits" in one week because they released an album. It's reductive and defeats the meaning of either chart. A top 10 should be a recognisable song to the GP, not just an album track that's benefitting from being track one on Harrys new album. Its also bad for the industry as fewer acts will be represented in the official charts 

Edited by Otter
Posted
On 5/28/2022 at 7:14 AM, Otter said:

Charts historically are reflected in 2 main forms 
Albums: Bodies of work that people are buying and listening to
Singles: Stand alone songs people are buying/listening to.

 

The singles chart is not supposed to reflect what album people are listening to, and the album chart is not supposed to reflect what singles people are listening to. Otherwise the inidividual charts become redundant and you might as well just have one. This is a problem with the streaming age, as albums are getting high sales based of people streaming a few singles and equally people scoring 10 "hits" in one week because they released an album. It's reductive and defeats the meaning of either chart. A top 10 should be a recognisable song to the GP, not just an album track that's benefitting from being track one on Harrys new album. Its also bad for the industry as fewer acts will be represented in the official charts 

It's not that deep.

 

OT: Some said he might have 5 in top 10 as well :clap3:

Posted

Nobody is doing it like him :deadbanana2:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.