celeb news Drew Barrymore laughs at Depp/Heard trial

[NausAllien]

52 minutes ago, i spit on haters said:

we'll just ignore her photos and evidence of assault. 

And just in case people forgot:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And there are HUNDREDS of pictures in the case files if you want to see them.

 

All these pictures were found to be CREDIBLE in a COURT OF LAW and that's why the court sided with the defendants and determined it was correct to call Depp a WIFE-BEATER

 

[brazil]

I honestly think people should watch the entire trial if they want to express opinions on this. Some people keep taking out of context bits and making it seem like it fits whatever narrative they want to believe, mainly the narrative that Amber is a evil ***** and Johnny Depp a poor abused soul. Post-truth indeed

Edited April 30, 2022 by brazil

[Ari29]

2 hours ago, JCsNumba1Fan said:

Amber is painted as such an Angel in some spaces. “No one will ever believe you,” the co-abuser says on tape. And of course, she should be the only one believed. 
 

I think she was the aggressor and initiated abuse based on what I’ve seen in this trial so far. Johnny is hardly innocent, and his texts were damning, but this idea that he’s the villain and she was the helpless victim is a garbage take. They’re both responsible for the abuse, verbally and physically. 
 

I don’t know where public opinion stands, but I wouldn’t award either of them a dime if I was on the jury. Two extremely toxic people cancel each other out, and defamation by law must prove that you had no part in ruining your own reputation. I don’t think Johnny can prove that. But if the jury simply likes and believes him more and Amber bombs on cross, she could still lose. I expect her cross to be brutal.

 

If the jury does their job, this will end embarrassingly for both. Maybe more for Johnny since he’s the plaintiff and he’s on this crusade to clear a name that he soiled on his own, with the help of a toxic woman he was also toxic to. 
 

 

The only reason any of this is public is because of the op-ed she wrote as a hit piece on him. Her intention was to soil his name as her last “ gotcha” to him after the divorce. All of this speaks to her manipulative behavior and it’s why the tide has turned against her.

[anastasha]

12 hours ago, bidet said:

Idk man I strongly support Johnny but I still laugh at that trial because the world finally gets to see what kind of a psychopath this woman is

Do some research, Johnny is no innocent party.

[anastasha]

8 hours ago, Ari29 said:

The only reason any of this is public is because of the op-ed she wrote as a hit piece on him. Her intention was to soil his name as her last “ gotcha” to him after the divorce. All of this speaks to her manipulative behavior and it’s why the tide has turned against her.

She never mentioned his name. This is so public because he decided to sue her. Him suing her is another form of abuse on his end. He lost his Beasts role because he sued The Sun and LOST because there is enough proof that he abused her.

[anastasha]

9 hours ago, brazil said:

I honestly think people should watch the entire trial if they want to express opinions on this. Some people keep taking out of context bits and making it seem like it fits whatever narrative they want to believe, mainly the narrative that Amber is a evil ***** and Johnny Depp a poor abused soul. Post-truth indeed

You can see it in clips where people mock Amber's lawyer for using the term "mega-pint" and don't include the part where he gets embarrassed because the lawyer points out he used that term in the UK trial.

 

He's outright lied and contradicted himself in his testimony int he trial against The Sun vs this one but they'll never acknowledge that. He's changing the story constantly to see what will stick.

[Ari29]

1 hour ago, anastasha said:

She never mentioned his name. This is so public because he decided to sue her. Him suing her is another form of abuse on his end. He lost his Beasts role because he sued The Sun and LOST because there is enough proof that he abused her.

Right, she had only previously accused him in 2016 of being abusive when she filed for divorce, withdrew a domestic violence restraining order and released a joint statement saying there was no violence. Only to write the op-Ed accusing him again after people called her out for not donating the $7 million settlement to charity as she promised…yet didn’t do. 
 

Neither one are totally innocent but looking at the moves she’s made and the domestic violence in her past relationship I don’t see why certain people are insisting on her being a complete victim. Her words in the audio recordings should’ve been enough to make that clear 

[anastasha]

6 minutes ago, Ari29 said:

Only to write the op-Ed accusing him again after people called her out for not donating the $7 million settlement to charity as she promised…yet didn’t do. 

She didn't mention his name in the op-ed. She also did donate some of the money, sadly the rest she had to use to pay for lawyers because this fucker kept coming after her in courts. She was never rich, and not a high-earning actress, she had financial difficulties. She's not Johnny who blows all his money on booze and drugs.

[Ari29]

1 hour ago, anastasha said:

She didn't mention his name in the op-ed. She also did donate some of the money, sadly the rest she had to use to pay for lawyers because this fucker kept coming after her in courts. She was never rich, and not a high-earning actress, she had financial difficulties. She's not Johnny who blows all his money on booze and drugs.

I conceded that she never mentioned his name but was there any question about who she was referring to when the divorce was in 2016 and her op-ed was in 2018 and she referenced becoming the face of domestic violence 2 years ago. 
 

You saying “she never mention his name” is lowkey something she would do…it’s clear and very obvious who she’s talking about but because she wasn’t explicit you couldn’t figure out exactly who she was talking about. Your whole argument is completely disingenuous 

[Gaia]

15 hours ago, anastasha said:

Regardless of your opinion on who is or isn't guilty of what, this clip is so disturbing. The way people have responded to and treated this trial as some form of entertainment, creating 'savage' edits and meme-ing it is disturbing considering the context of the trial. People are becoming so desensitised to violence and the people involved.

 

It's also very easy to take from what was said that victims shouldn't come forward, "why do we know about this" because abuse should be known.

 

The only reason this trial is being shown publicly is because of one of the people involved in this case also, and I'll just say it's not Amber who wanted it public. 

It’s good it’s public because the world gets to see what a clown Amber is