Jump to content

Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial


Coma Baby
Bloo
Message added by Bloo,

Mentioning @ATRL Feedback or @ATRL Administration does nothing. No staff member sees those notifications. If there is a member that is breaking ATRL rules, please report them and provide any additional context you think would better inform how we should judge it.

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

Yet you are not surprised that a man who, without even needing to believe a single word Amber or her witnesses said or her evidence against him, “joked” about shooting up n-words, beating his girlfriend up and killing and then raping his other girlfriend, dated a 17 year old, dates women in their early 20s while pushing 60, got arrested for his violent outbursts 3 times, claimed Polanski was not a pedo cause he wasn’t out on the streets looking for his victims still has stans? Please :swan:

damn :deadbanana4:

 

OT: Johnny Depp's a psycho, an abuser and a SH*T actor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • NausAllien

    329

  • suburbannature

    225

  • Patient Zero

    187

  • Mobility Mary

    147

7 minutes ago, Gaia said:

The psychiatrist who compared Johnny’s movie speech skills to his depositions :deadbanana2: 

 

Him asking the judge if he has to answer the question. 

 

The judge “you… have to answer questions… yes”

 

:ahh: 

Yeah, he was a very poor witness. No self-control as a psychiatrist :deadbanana2:

 

I'm sure he's knowledgeable, but that was ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@NausAllien Do they move to final arguments after the rebuttal period is completed or does the defense have an opportunity to recall any witnesses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the difference between Amber's and Depp's witnesses :bibliahh:

 

 Amber's "expert" is getting clocked today

Edited by Patient Zero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, rzal said:

Oop, you’re right. He has done (and continues to do) so many disgusting things even outside of this trial. Manson is even his daughter’s godfather and is now suing his victim as well. So proud that the icon of wife beaters, pedos, predators and rapists Johnny Depp inspired his bestie to sue a woman half his age who he raped and abused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depp's side keeps saying Ana De Armas played a "naked poster" in Blade Runner as if she appeared in it for 10 seconds :rip: His lawyer said that yesterday and now a witness. She's on the poster and part of the main cast:rip: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, suburbannature said:

@NausAllien Do they move to final arguments after the rebuttal period is completed or does the defense have an opportunity to recall any witnesses?

They should move to final arguments. Rebuttal is an additional chance the plaintiff (or government for criminal cases) has to present new testimonies that refute the testimonies the defense has presented. Since THEY have the burden of proof, they get this last chance to make their case.

 

Amber's team is also running out of time. The time they have left will probably be used for the cross-examination of the rebuttal witnesses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going through Twitter now and the Depp rats are sounding more and more like the Trumpsters circa 2016 :deadbanana2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD's witnesses are very weak, the idea that studios wouldn't assess intensive negative media backlash against an actress before casting them is ludicrous, if that's the case then Johnny's case should be dismissed pronto! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the tide is turning... :gaycat2:

 

Most of the replies under this tweet are people supporting Amber Heard, with hundreds of likes each:

 

It's literally night and day:

FTiZyWVXoAA-3rz?format=jpg&name=900x900

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, brazil said:

JD's witnesses are very weak, the idea that studios wouldn't assess intensive negative media backlash against an actress before casting them is ludicrous, if that's the case then Johnny's case should be dismissed pronto! 

Also their proof being that the keyword “sexual violence hoax” didn’t have a substantial increase in tweets after Waldman’s statement :deadbanana4:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to interrupt this Amber circle rimming you guys are currently doing, but her team probably has only 3 hours left, or less.

 

Amber's court time could end tomorrow morning. I don't want to sound like a concern troll, but I'm concerned for her!!

Edited by Patient Zero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully this thing is over in the upcoming days, I'm tired of hearing about it :zzz: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has Wife Beater Johnny Depp actually presented any evidence yet that Women's Rights Advocate Amber Heard defamed him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, we get it. Amber is not, and never was, a main movie girl

How many times does Depp's team need to prove this?

Edited by Patient Zero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's such a weird line of questioning.

 

Gal Gadot was fairly unknown until she was cast as Wonder Woman for Batman v Superman. She was just a side character but she got her own spin-off movie afterwards. There's no way of proving Mera wouldn't have gotten her own spin-off movie if Amber didn't have so much negative publicity around her. Both actresses are very comparable when it comes to their careers, with Amber having a slight edge because she had more experience prior to Aquaman. Once you're cast as the lead in one of this superhero films, you pretty much become an A-lister. But that would never happen now with all the negative publicity that resulted from Waldmann's comments and leaked audios. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it obvious that both their careers went down after Amber's claim of abuse?

 

Both lost money.

Edited by Patient Zero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like it or not Amber was on the commercial rise with Aquaman! She also had some buzz under her name in the non blockbuster space. 
 

 

So funny watching these witnesses tear both Amber’s and Johnny’s careers apart.  The way Johnny had to sit through hearing about his dip in Hollywood :ahh:

 

You’re one flop away from a career dip :toofunny2:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does Depp keep providing evidence that Heard's career stalled after the Walden statements? They're just arguing over dates. 

 

---

 

HELP this witness saying tweets with "Waldman" with negative hashtags have nothing to do with Waldman :deadbanana4:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Patient Zero said:

Isn't it obvious that both their careers went down after Amber's claim of abuse?

 

Both lost money.

Johnny was fumbling the bag years before though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, chris1991 said:

Johnny was fumbling the bag years before though

Yes, his last few movies were absolute ****.

But the Fantasic Beast recast is a thing. Although he still got paid, I think.

And Disney dropping him from PotC. He's basically the embodiment of PotC and the movies were still making lots of money. But he got kicked out.

 

Depp was always lead. Even in his shitty movies. The movies were made with him in mind. And he earned lots of money per role, no matter how shitty the movie was.

Amber was a female side character in ONE popular movie. The movie had her in it, but she wasn't the main character and she didn't make the movie a succes.

 

Even in his flop era, Depp had more star power than Heard.

 

Amber's future succes based on ONE smash movie is speculation. Johnny got dropped by studio's. That's a fact.

 

Edited by Patient Zero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Patient Zero said:

Johnny got dropped by studio's. That's a fact.

He was dropped by WB AFTER he lost the UK case. He can't argue he lost that role because of Amber's op-ed and that's why they didn't bring it up. They keep talking about the Pirates 6 film, which still doesn't exist and was NEVER greenlighted. The Disney executive who testify said they decided that the SUMMER before Amber's op-ed was published, and the article they paid attention to wasn't Amber's op-ed but the famous Rolling Stone article.

 

So even if Depp can prove his career took a dip in recent years, he hasn't been able to prove to a reasonable standard that the op-ed was directly responsible. It's clear he had issues BEFORE they even separated and his work was slowing down. And now he can't even work not because of her op-ed but because he lost the UK trial and he's legally considered a wife-beater. He also lost a Houdini role after losing that trial, if memories serves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is this witness from Hicksville(?) such a big deal? I was talking to my fuckin ex while the witness was talking.

 

Elaine seems very pressed in front of the judge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh wowww. Now I understand.

Another proof of Heard being abusive.

 

Amber being toxic re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-reconfirmed :biblionny:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.