Jump to content

Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial


Bloo
Message added by Bloo,

Mentioning @ATRL Feedback or @ATRL Administration does nothing. No staff member sees those notifications. If there is a member that is breaking ATRL rules, please report them and provide any additional context you think would better inform how we should judge it.

Recommended Posts

Posted

The most evil laugh I've heard.:deadbanana:

  • Replies 4.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • NausAllien

    329

  • suburbannature

    225

  • Patient Zero

    187

  • Mobility Mary

    147

Posted
On 4/22/2022 at 1:54 PM, Digitalism said:

I hate this thread because it's embarrasing

There is no victim in this trial. Both were toxic and did horrible things. How can you support any of them. It doesn't matter who started it. People need to be held accountable for their actions and stop playing victims

 

On 4/24/2022 at 8:11 AM, Digitalism said:

If you pick a side here you're dumb. 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Digitalism said:

What saddens me the most about this thread is that a lot of you don't undertand at all the dynamics of abuse. So you will probably end up abusing or being abused

4067A7A2-D433-499B-9468-EDAD598F96FA.thu

Posted

Emily Baker (youtube lawyer commentator) was just speaking to another lawyer who was able to get into the courthouse today and he said the jury's demeanor seemed distant today, and another lawyer from yesterday stated the same thing yesterday. Most of the jury have their focus Vasquez and not Amber. He also said they were looking down "almost shame-like" during the recording where Amber was degrading Johnny's career. Juror 3? was a constant note taker during past testimony but hasn't written anything at all since Amber has been on the stand. Interesting hearing their point of view of how the jurors are reacting. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, FameFatale said:

Emily Baker (youtube lawyer commentator) was just speaking to another lawyer who was able to get into the courthouse today and he said the jury's demeanor seemed distant today, and another lawyer from yesterday stated the same thing yesterday. Most of the jury have their focus Vasquez and not Amber. He also said they were looking down "almost shame-like" during the recording where Amber was degrading Johnny's career. Juror 3? was a constant note taker during past testimony but hasn't written anything at all since Amber has been on the stand. Interesting hearing their point of view of how the jurors are reacting. 

I'm not sure what this means for the outcome.

Posted

she's over after that recording.

:bibliahh:

"I never started a fight with him"

*clip plays*

"i StArTeD iT"

:bibliahh:

Posted
Just now, 東京. said:

she's over after that recording.

:bibliahh:

"I never started a fight with him"

*clip plays*

"i StArTeD iT"

:bibliahh:

Some of y'all are crazy uninformed and impressionable :deadbanana2:

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, FameFatale said:

Emily Baker (youtube lawyer commentator) was just speaking to another lawyer who was able to get into the courthouse today and he said the jury's demeanor seemed distant today, and another lawyer from yesterday stated the same thing yesterday. Most of the jury have their focus Vasquez and not Amber. He also said they were looking down "almost shame-like" during the recording where Amber was degrading Johnny's career. Juror 3? was a constant note taker during past testimony but hasn't written anything at all since Amber has been on the stand. Interesting hearing their point of view of how the jurors are reacting. 

im dumb, what could this mean for the possible outcome?

Edited by TheCal
Posted
1 minute ago, suburbannature said:

Some of y'all are crazy uninformed and impressionable :deadbanana2:

The people who are defending Amber are this, yes.

:gaycat5:

Posted
2 minutes ago, TheCal said:

im dumb, what does this mean for the outcome?

It doesn't mean anything. It's just an observation 

Posted

Omg Camilles about to play Ambers 2016 deposition video….

 

Amber is screwed 

Posted (edited)

Bredehoft just coming into picture and tapping  Vasquez's screen to stop the recording :ahh:  What on earth

Edited by Dark Miracles
Posted
8 minutes ago, bjorn said:

Omg Camilles about to play Ambers 2016 deposition video….

 

Amber is screwed 

She said the same thing :deadbanana:

Posted (edited)

So they were already on trail for this **** in 2016? :rip:

Edited by makeme
Posted

the TMZ bomb

:deadbanana4:

Posted
2 minutes ago, Seffers said:

the TMZ bomb

:deadbanana4:

i cackled.

:bibliahh:

the fact she's bringing up other partner abuse now, get ha jade.

Posted

This is better than a thriller 

Posted

@NausAllien we need more of your receipts. Depp stans getting out of hand again in here with his lawyer's implication :rip: 

Posted

That was it?!?! :rip: 

Posted

I know her lawyer did not just mock Johnny's voice

this is a mess :deadbanana4:

Posted (edited)

Amber putting both the TMZ and ex-partner implications to rest immediately on cross. What an unprofessional disaster Depp's team is :rip: 

 

Amber's team isn't much better but they're at least effective.

 

Edited by suburbannature
Posted

she just denied ever hitting her ex wife when multiple people at the airport witnessed it and was actually "arrested and booked for misdemeanor domestic violence, and appeared in court the next day. The prosecutor, however, reportedly let her go with a warning because both women lived in California at the time.":rip:

 

 but she is now claiming Johnny's team planted that story  :rip:

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, suburbannature said:

That was it?!?! :rip: 

That was kinda meh. Camille wasn't that good as she could have been

 

1 minute ago, Seffers said:

I know her lawyer did not just mock Johnny's voice

this is a mess :deadbanana4:

that was so random:bibliahh:

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, TheCal said:

That was kinda meh. Camille wasn't that good as she could have been

 

that was so random:bibliahh:

like what was the reason :bibliahh:

and now she's butchering the pronunciation the lawyer's name 3 times in a row

ma'am :bibliahh:

Edited by Seffers
Posted (edited)

I can't believe that's all they could come up with on cross of the defendant :deadbanana4:

 

They did nothing to prove the criteria needed for this trial regarding the purpose of the op-ed.

 

Edited by suburbannature
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, kawk said:

she just denied ever hitting her ex wife when multiple people at the airport witnessed it and was actually "arrested and booked for misdemeanor domestic violence, and appeared in court the next day. The prosecutor, however, reportedly let her go with a warning because both women lived in California at the time.":rip:

 

 but she is now claiming Johnny's team planted that story  :rip:

 

 

I'm pretty sure that her ex wife defended her, that there wasn't any abuse tho. Or something like that. Everything in this trial is so messy:rip:

Edited by TheCal
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.