celeb news Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial

[NausAllien]

1 minute ago, Darkgalord said:

Exposing her lies to the GP is what's important. Her public image has been destroyed beyond repair which means her career or whatever is left is over. Producers will not want to work with her for obvious reasons.

We know Jhonny will lose this case but his image in the GPS eyes has been restored,and his legacy will forever exist. He won.

I don't know how losing TWO trials in TWO different countries, one with a jury, another with a High Court judge, and losing the successive appeals will PROVE he was telling the truth. Let's not forget WB fired right after losing the UK trial.

 

The GP can think whatever they want. It wouldn't be the first time they demonize a female victim. I fully expect a "Framing Amber Heard" documentary in 20 years and everyone wondering why the media and public treated a victim of DV and sexual abuse like that.

[BobBertran1992]

I watched this live for the first time, and hearing Depp's attorney grill Amber Heard on why she didn't report Depp's sexual assault is sickening, it left me pretty disturbed... I'm sticking to reading about this (and seeing tiny pieces) rather than seeing the whole thing.

[NausAllien]

Just now, BobBertran1992 said:

I watched this live for the first time, and hearing Depp's attorney grill Amber Heard on why she didn't report Depp's sexual assault is sickening, it left me pretty disturbed... I'm sticking to reading about this (and seeing tiny pieces) rather than seeing the whole thing.

And Depp's lawyer made sure to use the word "rape" multiple times and be as abrasive and insensitive as possible. But we all knew this was going to happen. Their strategy is to blame the victim and try to cast aspersions on her by whatever bogus claims they can come up with. 

[Ari29]

28 minutes ago, MAKSIM said:

As an attorney, Camille was embarrassing today. She fumbled the most important piece of evidence today and admitted to not knowing why “well-nourished male” was in Kippler’s medical testimony while she was trying to use it against Amber.  
 

The most effective part of her questioning was only on a character point that is irrelevant to any defamation . 

Then why are so many verified attorneys not agreeing with your assessment of her performance?

[BobBertran1992]

4 minutes ago, Ari29 said:

Then why are so many verified attorneys not agreeing with your assessment of her performance?

What was that medical record saying Amber Heard was a ''Well nourished male''?

[brraap]

2 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

And Depp's lawyer made sure to use the word "rape" multiple times and be as abrasive and insensitive as possible. But we all knew this was going to happen. Their strategy is to blame the victim and try to cast aspersions on her by whatever bogus claims they can come up with. 

Is that not what she claimed happened to her in her testimony. They pretty much just read back to her everything she claimed and asked why she didn't seek treatment or where the evidence for these things occurring is, as they are required to do in a cross examination.  Very different to victim blaming. Remember she has alleged that this happened to her and must back it up when challenged.

[Darkgalord]

5 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

I don't know how losing TWO trials in TWO different countries, one with a jury, another with a High Court judge, and losing the successive appeals will PROVE he was telling the truth. Let's not forget WB fired right after losing the UK trial.

 

The GP can think whatever they want. It wouldn't be the first time they demonize a female victim. I fully expect a "Framing Amber Heard" documentary in 20 years and everyone wondering why the media and public treated a victim of DV and sexual abuse like that.

She has no legacy , no one will remember her in 20 years. why would anyone make a documentary about her. She's not an iconic actress .lol

Both of them were messy during their relationship, she's no saint, the way she tried to destroyed him is coming back to bite her. Consequences. 

They should've divorced amicably.

[Buffy]

I’m confused. I thought Depp was winning? He’s not? Who is really the victim in this case?

[BobBertran1992]

Just now, Darkgalord said:

She has no legacy , no one will remember her in 20 years. why would anyone make a documentary about her. She's not an iconic actress .lol

Both of them were messy during their relationship, she's no saint, the way she tried to destroyed him is coming back to bite her. Consequences. 

They should've divorced amicably.

Dearie, there are plenty of documentaries/works of fiction about non actors/celebrities in general who have been involved in messy trials like this one  

[Ari29]

4 minutes ago, BobBertran1992 said:

What was that medical record saying Amber Heard was a ''Well nourished male''?

You think that one oversight made more of an impact than her getting Amber to say she wasn’t afraid of her alleged abuser under oath?

[Darkgalord]

1 minute ago, BobBertran1992 said:

Dearie, there are plenty of documentaries/works of fiction about non actors/celebrities in general who have been involved in messy trials like this one  

Okay good luck with that documentary. She's been exposed. That's all we wanted. The GP are with Johnny. This is not the end of him. 

[brraap]

When she gets a little too overconfident the mask slips off and gives us blunders like "why would I be scared of him" 

[NausAllien]

6 minutes ago, BobBertran1992 said:

What was that medical record saying Amber Heard was a ''Well nourished male''?

https://twitter.com/tomwambsgans/status/1526301071274024960

 

1 minute ago, Ari29 said:

You think that one oversight made more of an impact than her getting Amber to say she wasn’t afraid of her alleged abuser under oath?

That's NOT what she said. She said she wasn't afraid of sending that particular picture of him sleeping to her friend because she needed some support. She also established that Depp under the influence of opioids was different than under the influence of other substances. It'd be great if you didn't distort her testimony.

[NausAllien]

7 minutes ago, Buffy said:

I’m confused. I thought Depp was winning? He’s not? Who is really the victim in this case?

Amber Heard is the victim of domestic abuse and sexual assault. Depp has tried to use the DARVO strategy (deny, attack, and reverse victim and offender) but Amber has a mountain of evidence that prove her abuse. That's the reason he lost in the UK. It was proven to a civil standard that he had abused Amber Heard at least 12 times and that calling him a "wife beater" wasn't defamatory. He also lost the appeal.

 

In this particular case, he's tried to paint Amber as a liar, a gold-digger, a crazy psycho, etc. but nothing is really landing because the facts aren't on his side. Even his fans know he's going to lose this trial, and I'm sure Depp knows this as well. So he's trying to win in the court of public opinion with one of the most outrageous disinformation campaigns ever seen. But ultimately he's doing a terrible job at proving that the op-ed Amber wrote defamed him, that what she claimed wasn't true, that there was malice involved, and that caused him a real monetary loss.

[kawk]

1 minute ago, NausAllien said:

Amber Heard is the victim of domestic abuse and sexual assault. Depp has tried to use the DARVO strategy (deny, attack, and reverse victim and offender) but Amber has a mountain of evidence that prove her abuse. That's the reason he lost in the UK. It was proven to a civil standard that he had abused Amber Heard at least 12 times and that calling him a "wife beater" wasn't defamatory. He also lost the appeal.

 

In this particular case, he's tried to paint Amber as a liar, a gold-digger, a crazy psycho, etc. but nothing is really landing because the facts aren't on his side. Even his fans know he's going to lose this trial, and I'm sure Depp knows this as well. So he's trying to win in the court of public opinion with one of the most outrageous disinformation campaigns ever seen. But ultimately he's doing a terrible job at proving that the op-ed Amber wrote defamed him, that what she claimed wasn't true, that there was malice involved, and that caused him a real monetary loss.

he lost the case because in the UK they allow hearsay  the UK justice system is a complete joke and SEVERELY outdated  that is a fact. 

[Ari29]

8 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

https://twitter.com/tomwambsgans/status/1526301071274024960

 

That's NOT what she said. She said she wasn't afraid of sending that particular picture of him sleeping to her friend because she needed some support. She also established that Depp under the influence of opioids was different than under the influence of other substances. It'd be great if you didn't distort her testimony.

Now THAT is not what she said. You’re taking part of her testimony and applying context as YOU see fit. 

[Park Jinyoung]

14 hours ago, drsouchan said:

I watched the original video that Deppford wives accused Amber Heard of pausing to pose for photo. And found evidence to prove it was false.

Oddly , the light shone only on the center of Johnny Depp's face and chest.

If this light was the camera flash, the light should be powered enough to shone on the PC monitor in front of him, as well as the seats and the lawyers behind him.

But, as we can see, the light only shone on Johnny Depp's center body.

Therefore, we can conclude that

The light that appeared on Amber was not a camera flash, It's PC screen light.

That PC screen was showing something and it caused a light, Amber paused in order to read the screen.

She DIDN'T pause for photo.

The most disgusting part is, when Deppford wives made meme videos accused Amber Heard "poses" , they crops out the view of Johnny Depp so that people can't find out the truth.

 

 

Deppford wives worked really hard to create fake news to hurt a woman who had been domestically abused.

 

 

Another way to prove it, is you can not find "Puts tissue down" photos on any website.

 

 

Exactly.
But the fact this needs to be explained 

[chhalamars]

His reputation is already cleared. #BelieveHim 

[NausAllien]

16 minutes ago, kawk said:

he lost the case because in the UK they allow hearsay  the UK justice system is a complete joke and SEVERELY outdated  that is a fact. 

Everyone says it's easier to win a defamation case in the UK, and yet he lost.

 

I don't know what that's supposed hearsay you claim they allowed. I read all 129 pages of the verdict Mr Justice Nicol wrote and I didn't see anything that could be considered hearsay. Do you have a specific example?

[That Bad Eartha]

The way the worms for brains section of the internet has showed up in full force to defend some foul man they became obsessed with when they were twelve just because they made their whole personality out of a hot topic collection of one of a handful of mediocre movies where he appealed to their slightly kooky/slightly goth sensibilities and they haven't grown or evolved as humans even a little bit since then.

 

Absolutely pathetic, I have to laugh.

[worldwide angel]

2 minutes ago, That Bad Eartha said:

The way the worms for brains section of the internet has showed up in full force to defend some foul man they became obsessed with when they were twelve just because they made their whole personality out of a hot topic collection of one of a handful of mediocre movies where he appealed to their slightly kooky/slightly goth sensibilities and they haven't grown or evolved as humans even a little bit since then.

 

Absolutely pathetic, I have to laugh.

clock them

 

34 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

Amber Heard is the victim of domestic abuse and sexual assault. Depp has tried to use the DARVO strategy (deny, attack, and reverse victim and offender) but Amber has a mountain of evidence that prove her abuse. That's the reason he lost in the UK. It was proven to a civil standard that he had abused Amber Heard at least 12 times and that calling him a "wife beater" wasn't defamatory. He also lost the appeal.

 

In this particular case, he's tried to paint Amber as a liar, a gold-digger, a crazy psycho, etc. but nothing is really landing because the facts aren't on his side. Even his fans know he's going to lose this trial, and I'm sure Depp knows this as well. So he's trying to win in the court of public opinion with one of the most outrageous disinformation campaigns ever seen. But ultimately he's doing a terrible job at proving that the op-ed Amber wrote defamed him, that what she claimed wasn't true, that there was malice involved, and that caused him a real monetary loss.

another one thank you  

[Buffy]

38 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

Amber Heard is the victim of domestic abuse and sexual assault. Depp has tried to use the DARVO strategy (deny, attack, and reverse victim and offender) but Amber has a mountain of evidence that prove her abuse. That's the reason he lost in the UK. It was proven to a civil standard that he had abused Amber Heard at least 12 times and that calling him a "wife beater" wasn't defamatory. He also lost the appeal.

 

In this particular case, he's tried to paint Amber as a liar, a gold-digger, a crazy psycho, etc. but nothing is really landing because the facts aren't on his side. Even his fans know he's going to lose this trial, and I'm sure Depp knows this as well. So he's trying to win in the court of public opinion with one of the most outrageous disinformation campaigns ever seen. But ultimately he's doing a terrible job at proving that the op-ed Amber wrote defamed him, that what she claimed wasn't true, that there was malice involved, and that caused him a real monetary loss.

How come everyone in the comments is saying Amber is guilty and a terrible example of domestic abuse victim? Depp’s lawyer has a point. I don’t see any wounds on her face. If he beat her up wearing lots of rings, where’s all the marks to prove it?

Edited May 16, 2022 by Buffy

[MasterExpose]

The way she talks to him in those records and look at him reminds me to the way abusers hold power over their victims knowing noone will believe them 

[More Than A Melody]

I'm so tempted to dump the mountains of proof in context I've seen elsewhere and watch the Depp fangirls combust... it's a lot of effort but I'm tempted.

[BobBertran1992]

4 minutes ago, More Than A Melody said:

I'm so tempted to dump the mountains of proof in context I've seen elsewhere and watch the Depp fangirls combust... it's a lot of effort but I'm tempted.

Pleeease do.