Jump to content

Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial


Bloo
Message added by Bloo,

Mentioning @ATRL Feedback or @ATRL Administration does nothing. No staff member sees those notifications. If there is a member that is breaking ATRL rules, please report them and provide any additional context you think would better inform how we should judge it.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Depp’s lawyers are embarrassing 

 

 

 

  • Replies 4.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • NausAllien

    329

  • suburbannature

    225

  • Patient Zero

    187

  • Mobility Mary

    147

Posted

The Deppford Wives entered the chat...

 

Camilla isn't proving or disproving anything. Her questions are really embarrassing and harmful to victims of DV. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, manuelalex9810 said:

Depp’s lawyers are embarrassing 

 

 

 

This lawyer is who the misogynistic gays in here are stanning? :ahh:

Posted

Ouch...I feel bad for Amber...

These donation questions are brutal.

Posted

Amber is being eviscerated :deadbanana: 

She had the entirety of the divorce settlement for 13 months before she got sued and STILL didn't pay it :rip:

Posted
1 minute ago, Patient Zero said:

Ouch...I feel bad for Amber...

These donation questions are brutal.

i'm on the floor lmao

Posted

Her raising her voice and getting angry on the stand over the 7m still not being donated :deadbanana2:

Posted

"Those payments came from your new boyfriend Elon Musk, right?"

 

:deadbanana4:

Posted
9 minutes ago, Patient Zero said:

Ouch...I feel bad for Amber...

These donation questions are brutal.

Elaine trying to buy her time before the **** show :bibliahh:

Posted

Not sure if Heard would've withstood a further barrage from Vasquez much longer, that break came at a welcome time for her

Bredehoft was silenced so many times the past 30 minutes :deadbanana:

Posted

Not her not paying the money :rip: girl…

Posted

As an attorney, Camille was embarrassing today. She fumbled the most important piece of evidence today and admitted to not knowing why “well-nourished male” was in Kippler’s medical testimony while she was trying to use it against Amber. :rip: 
 

The most effective part of her questioning was only on a character point that is irrelevant to any defamation :rip:

Posted

She really fumbled the bag when she said she donated it all. As if that couldn’t be proven. What a dumb ass 

 

And the need to add that she wanted nothing at the end of her tv appearance when nobody asked… sounds like over compensation for lies to me 

Posted

Legit question: didn't Amber pledge to donate this money over a period of ten years?

Posted
1 minute ago, brraap said:

She really fumbled the bag when she said she donated it all. As if that couldn’t be proven. What a dumb ass 

 

And the need to add that she wanted nothing at the end of her tv appearance when nobody asked… sounds like over compensation for lies to me 

It's honestly beyond disgusting and evil at this point.:deadbanana:

Posted

Where can I watch 

Posted

not miss heard clinging to the 'pledged' word when it was already very harshly established that pledged and donated are not the same thing

 

brraap

Posted

The past two pages are exactly why Camille did terribly today by focusing on donations. It doesn’t matter if Heard donates today, tomorrow or yesterday. When the jury sits down, it will be completely irrelevant to a defamation case. Camille however did re-introduce medical records that have completely wrong information on it, which will definitely be brought up on cross and used in Heard’s closing statements. 
 

She “won” on something completely irrelevant, and lost on something completely relevant. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, BobBertran1992 said:

Legit question: didn't Amber pledge to donate this money over a period of ten years?

Correct. But don't tell the Deppford wives:

FSWilOjVcAEak9T?format=jpg&name=large

 

She has until 2026 to fulfill her pledge.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, MAKSIM said:

The past two pages are exactly why Camille did terribly today by focusing on donations. It doesn’t matter if Heard donates today, tomorrow or yesterday. When the jury sits down, it will be completely irrelevant to a defamation case. Camille however did re-introduce medical records that have completely wrong information on it, which will definitely be brought up on cross and used in Heard’s closing statements. 
 

She “won” on something completely irrelevant, and lost on something completely relevant. 

Because ultimately neither Depp nor his legal team think they can win this lawsuit. So their final goal is to cause as much damage as possible to Heard's reputation and try to cast her as a gold-digger, crazy, manipulative, a liar, etc. This has NEVER been about proving that her op-ed was defamatory.

Posted (edited)

Exposing her lies to the GP is what's important. Her public image has been destroyed beyond repair which means her career or whatever is left is over. Producers will not want to work with her for obvious reasons.

We know Johnny will lose this case but his image in the GPS eyes has been restored,and his legacy will forever exist. He won.

Edited by Darkgalord
Posted

A broken nose y'all  :chick2:

 

FS57SBXUcAEXGBU?format=png&name=small

 

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

Because ultimately neither Depp nor his legal team think they can win this lawsuit. So their final goal is to cause as much damage as possible to Heard's reputation and try to cast her as a gold-digger, crazy, manipulative, a liar, etc. This has NEVER been about proving that her op-ed was defamatory.

Yeah, it just seems crazy to me as an attorney that you would willfully have a medical record presented to an adverse witness without knowing that it has a huge glaring error on it and being startled by that while you are presenting a case. 
 

EDIT: I just looked at what law school she attended, and now it makes a bit more sense. 

Edited by MAKSIM
Posted
8 minutes ago, MAKSIM said:

The past two pages are exactly why Camille did terribly today by focusing on donations. It doesn’t matter if Heard donates today, tomorrow or yesterday. When the jury sits down, it will be completely irrelevant to a defamation case. Camille however did re-introduce medical records that have completely wrong information on it, which will definitely be brought up on cross and used in Heard’s closing statements. 
 

She “won” on something completely irrelevant, and lost on something completely relevant. 

Amber's making herself look bad by declaring under oath that she "donated" and then later backtracking and saying uses "donating/ pledge synonymously" when BY DEFINITION do not mean the same thing. If she cannot keep those statements straight, do you not think the jury will question her other statements? 

Posted
Just now, brraap said:

A broken nose y'all  :chick2:

 

FS57SBXUcAEXGBU?format=png&name=small

 

the Heard absolutists will say this is photoshopped. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.