Jump to content

Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial


Bloo
Message added by Bloo,

Mentioning @ATRL Feedback or @ATRL Administration does nothing. No staff member sees those notifications. If there is a member that is breaking ATRL rules, please report them and provide any additional context you think would better inform how we should judge it.

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Raspy said:

she shoulve taken acting lessons first before doing the interview

giphy.gif

giphy.gif

giphy.gif

She would have had an OUNCE of believability. 
 

giphy.gif

  • Replies 4.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • NausAllien

    329

  • suburbannature

    225

  • Patient Zero

    187

  • Mobility Mary

    147

Posted

That gif is disgusting, you really need to go out and touch some grass :katie:

Posted
5 hours ago, Weld_E said:

Watch them ignore this post like the plague

 

They can enjoy the win for the next few weeks until Depp returns to court for physically assaulting a crew member next month :toofunny3:

Typical AH clique projection.

 

As if AH's ACLU-ghostwritten op ed accused JD of being "not nice". As if that is what the defamation suit is all about. His personality.

 

If the jury had declared that JD is undisputedly a lovey dovey, honey suckle sugarpop, then I'd be on the side of AH too. But that's not what they did.

Posted

 

Saw this comment on this video and I think it sums it up perfectly:

 

Quote

This is disgusting and disrespectful to the jury, the judge, and the entire court system. The jury sat there listening to all testimony including all her lies for SIX weeks and they did not believe her. Period. She needs to go home and listen to herself in those recordings. She is evil, abusive and vindictive and this is probably the first time she’s ever been held accountable for anything in her life. That’s why she can’t accept this loss. She was not believed and barely anyone showed up to support her. No one was there for her. Not metoo, not her fans, not her friends, not even her own father. Why? She needs to ask herself that. She is her own worst enemy. And talking about a fair representation online. How rich. Was she this concerned when he was the one getting all the vitriol and getting fired and forced to resign without even a chance of defending himself? She went out if her to make sure he didn’t get due process. Hypocrite. You got due process. You got the chance to present your case in a court of law and the jury didn’t believe you. That’s on you and not them.

 

:clap3:

Posted

Notice how the quote you are praising mentions 0 actual facts and just deals with their feelings towards Amber? Typical for Deppsters lmao

Posted
15 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

Notice how the quote you are praising mentions 0 actual facts and just deals with their feelings towards Amber? Typical for Deppsters lmao

Like it says, the jury and judge sat through everything Amber and her lawyer had to provide, they listened, they took it into consideration, and they still came to the verdict they came to. A fair trial, by all means.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Daydream said:

Like it says, the jury and judge sat through everything Amber and her lawyer had to provide, they listened, they took it into consideration, and they still came to the verdict they came to. A fair trial, by all means.

The judge in this trial wasn't making the verdict tho. If you wanna talk about judges you shoul also bring up a judge that declared him a wife bester and two other judges who confirmed the verdict.

Posted
9 hours ago, Raspy said:

she shoulve taken acting lessons first before doing the interview

giphy.gif

giphy.gif

giphy.gif

 

This gif, lmao:bibliahh:

Posted

Why are we even wasting time with Amber Stan’s who don’t even know what defamation means & think that Amber losing only means that she can’t talk about the “abuse” :rip:

  in order for Amber to have defamed Johnny, her claims had to be FALSE. And the jury ruled they were false.
She’s a court certified LIAR
 

giphy.gif

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Daydream said:

Like it says, the jury and judge sat through everything Amber and her lawyer had to provide, they listened, they took it into consideration, and they still came to the verdict they came to. A fair trial, by all means.

you mean the jury that didn’t even fill the document properly and fell asleep :rip: 

 

edit: mind you one of them is married to a deppster..

Edited by simon_xcx
added something
Posted
2 hours ago, Sparrow's Bride said:

who don’t even know what defamation means

The irony :rip:

Depp admitted to physically assaulting Amber at least twice, therefore, what she said was not defamatory. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Sparrow's Bride said:


She’s a court certified LIAR
 

And Depp is a court-certified wife-beater. Worry about that. 

Posted (edited)
On 6/13/2022 at 5:51 PM, Raiden said:

AH had some very backward (heavily gendered) idea about the concept of spousal abuse / domestic violence.

 

She relied too much on the physical power concept

 

She f*cked around and found out

Your right-wing trolling is usually obscene and disgusting but this is just too much and not okay.  ATRL cannot be where domestic violence is mocked and women who experience domestic violence "learned their lesson".

 

I'm literally shaking reading this post. No, nothing anyone says or can say justifies getting punched and slapped and kicked and head-butted. You are literally celebrating that Amber annoyed Depp and "****** around and found out" he'd put his hands on her despite it being proven that she never initiated physical contact.

 

This is too much. No victim of IPV or DV should have to sit here and watch you post this nonsense unchallenged and un-punished. You are quite literally suggesting there is justification for anyone to put their hands on someone because they said the wrong thing or annoyed them. In fact, you're quite literally reveling the idea of a man weaponizing stronger physical strength and physically hurting a woman for verbal abuse, but there is never, ever an excuse to put your hands on someone. No, nothing she said could have justified getting hit. No, nothing. That's literally the mindset of millions of abusers. No, we as victims don't "have it coming" if we "provoke" you by saying the wrong thing and rightfully assuming it won't transcend to physical violence.

 

Words can be violent but they are literally not violence and cannot justify the initiation of physical violence. :mazen:

 

You can support Depp without celebrating the idea that a woman, in your claim, assumed that her "gendered ideas" re: DV meant her husband wouldn't hit her for whining or being annoying and literally celebrating that said man did indeed hit his wife for what was only ever shown as verbal abuse:mazen:

 

In fact, you wouldn't out that your intent was misogynist trolling if you didn't openly start your post with a declaration mocking "gendered ideas" re: power imbalances between men & women. :skull:

Edited by Communion
Posted
4 hours ago, Daydream said:

 

Saw this comment on this video and I think it sums it up perfectly:

 

 

:clap3:

 

2 hours ago, Sparrow's Bride said:

Why are we even wasting time with Amber Stan’s who don’t even know what defamation means & think that Amber losing only means that she can’t talk about the “abuse” :rip:

  in order for Amber to have defamed Johnny, her claims had to be FALSE. And the jury ruled they were false.
She’s a court certified LIAR
 

giphy.gif

:clap3:

-

OT: she admitted herself multiple times that she beat him. Case is closed, she’s rightfully over. Hope she finds herself a nice McDonald's stop to work in :clap3: 

Posted (edited)

There are no bottom, there is no end, to AH's bitter envy and jealousy of other women.

 

Now she's out there telling Savanna Guthrie that THE Kate Moss, of all people, is a quote "rando" who "came out of the woodwork" :laugh:

 

Edited by Raiden
Posted

The Amber supporters think that the rest of us were rooting for Amber to be punished just because she’s a woman. This is not true. All, or most of us just wanted to see justice to be served. In this case it just happened to be Johnny who deserved justice. Not because he’s a man. Not because he’s a big star. But because he is the one who has been wronged. I’d say to the Amber supporters that it’s pretty clear by now majority of the world agrees with the verdict. So ask yourselves why is there only such a small group of people who are on Amber’s side? As well as accusing the jurors of misconduct, are you saying the whole world is wrong too?

 

With that said, I think it’s evident that people believe what they believe about this case and one side keeps trying to change the others mind, and it’s pointless. There’s having a discussion and then there’s beating a dead horse. :gaycat6:

Posted

I’m seriously wondering what morons can believe this woman. It’s painfully obvious she’s lying. Can someone link her testimony where she is seen eating cookies and rolling eyes? :rip:

Posted

I’m seriously wondering what morons can believe this woman. It’s painfully obvious she’s lying. Can someone link her testimony where she is seen eating cookies and rolling eyes? :rip:

Posted
8 minutes ago, KeshaSwift said:

I’m seriously wondering what morons can believe this woman. It’s painfully obvious she’s lying.

You're getting too brave now with the name calling whilst defending a proven liar:

 

https://thegeekbuzz.com/news/83-times-johnny-depp-lied-under-cross-examination-so-far/

 

NOTHING Amber said even compares to Depp claiming 'someone used his phone to send a text' after he was caught LYING about it.

 

Posted
12 hours ago, Mobility Mary said:

The same Johnny who has been arrested three times for violent outbursts? The same Johnny who is currently being sued over beating someone up (which he admitted)? The same Johnny who dates women 1/2 or 1/3 of his age, sometimes even minors, and then writes about drowning them, burning them, ******* their burnt corpse, smacking those ugly c*nts around and calls them whitering c*nts? The same Johnny who pretended to be indigenous for years? The same Johnny who repeteadly uses the n-word, says he's gonna shoot up some n-words and praises comedians for being brave enough to be racist? The same Johnny who refered to his bisexual wife as a lesbian camp counselor and her trans male friend as a d*yke b*tch? The same Johnny who bragged about beating people up in several interviews? The same Johnny who ordered his bodyguards to drag around a disabled woman? The same Johnny who is on tape telling his wife he headbutted her? The same Johnny who is on tape trying to make his wife feel bad for telling her friend to call the cops cause she thought he was gonna kill her since he also cut his finger off in a previous fight so that makes both of them victims of domestic abuse?

Please do tell us more about how much you love him :soda:

:deadbanana2:

 

I can understand why people don't like her, but I'm honestly shocked by the love that he's getting. It's disturbing how the public (even women) coddle, defend and rationalize the behavior of morally corrupt men. :deadbanana2:

Posted

5208-CA10-AC11-4-BFC-82-F6-E80472-CC83-B

 

Oh wow! Who could have seen this coming?

Surely no one has been saying the world will eventually realize how shitty of a person he is, right?

Posted
9 hours ago, Daydream said:

Savannah: "Here's the thing about the first amendment, the first amendment protects free speech, IT DOESN'T protect LIES that amount to defamation" 

 

THE WAY SAVANNAH DRAGGED HER HERE :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

Posted
24 minutes ago, kawk said:

Savannah: "Here's the thing about the first amendment, the first amendment protects free speech, IT DOESN'T protect LIES that amount to defamation" 

 

THE WAY SAVANNAH DRAGGED HER HERE :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

:ahh: 

 

Savannah doesn’t play around. Amber went to the wrong person. :ahh: 

Posted (edited)

Savannah is a former lawyer, as are many journalists of her ilk, so she's calling a spade a spade.

Edited by for lovers
Posted
5 hours ago, kawk said:

Savannah: "Here's the thing about the first amendment, the first amendment protects free speech, IT DOESN'T protect LIES that amount to defamation" 

 

THE WAY SAVANNAH DRAGGED HER HERE :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

She gathered her :clap3: ambers excuses are so tiring at this point 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.