celeb news Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial

[Weld_E]

1 minute ago, Chris said:

you should have had this conversation with Elaine, sweetie.

 

What is this nonessential argument  

Once again, proving that you have very little intellectual capacity to be engaging in this topic

 

2 minutes ago, Chris said:

And for the record, I don't have Tik Tok nor do I even watch videos on Tik Tok.

 

Based on the comprehension levels you displayed in this thread, I suggest you get one as it will be easier for you to follow some of the arguments made through their simpler video format.

 

3 minutes ago, Chris said:

Unless an appeal is happening, what's the point in arguing this any further

An appeal is in the process of taking place as revealed by Amber's lawyers. 

[Chris]

3 minutes ago, Weld_E said:

What is this nonessential argument

It's not a "nonessential argument". It's called do NOT talk about well constructed arguments. Repetitive arguments are not well constructed arguments.

 

Understand now?

 

5 minutes ago, Weld_E said:

Once again, proving that you have very little intellectual capacity to be engaging in this topic

I guess that means you have very little intellectual capacity as well since you are STILL engaging with me.

 

 

#TeamLowIntellectuals

 

5 minutes ago, Weld_E said:

Based on the comprehension levels you displayed in this thread, I suggest you get one as it will be easier for you to follow some of the arguments made through their simpler video forma

The way that some of these weirdos on here word their sentences is SO funny to me.

 

 

You would think some of these twinks were actually thinking they were either lawyers themselves or ACTUALLY part of the case.

 

 

6 minutes ago, Weld_E said:

An appeal is in the process of taking place as revealed by Amber's lawyers

Ok so until further then stop replying to me and stop flapping your gums to me since I have low intellect.

 

And also I just love how you so conveniently skipped over the fact you Amber Heard supporters literally weaponize domestic violence.

 

Thanks for further proving my point.

[Daydream]

Notice how the Little Heartsters just resort to attacking other members.

 

 

ABUSERS, just like their fave.

[Chris]

20 minutes ago, Daydream said:

What the MESS is going on up in here.

Oh just the usual ATRLers repeating themselves over and over, accusing people of not caring and supporting domestic violence; in other words weaponizing domestic violence.

 

It's also been revealed that certain ATRLers have actually been in domestic violence relationships and in usual fashion, the Hearders are completely ignoring that and therefore with their logic means they support it.

 

What else is new?

[Weld_E]

Not that one poster having the audacity to talk about abuse whilst championing the biggest abuser of them all

 

 

 

[Chris]

5 minutes ago, Weld_E said:

Not that one poster having the audacity to talk about abuse whilst championing the biggest abuser of them all

 

 

 

Wow, what an excellent well put together argument.

 

 

NO deflection at all.

 

 

Bravo.

[Daydream]

5 minutes ago, Weld_E said:

Not that one poster having the audacity to talk about abuse whilst championing the biggest abuser of them all

 

 

 

You really think you're above the law huh.  Not that it's even relevant to this discussion - but since you have no argument other than to deflect at every given opportunity since you can't defend Amber's actions in any way - Michael was proved innocent by the court of law, just like the lovely Johnny! We stan INNOCENT legends.

 

OT: Has there been any sightings of Amber working her new McDonald's job yet?

[Weld_E]

Just now, Daydream said:

but since you have no argument other than to deflect at every given opportunity since you can't defend Amber's actions in any way

I have presented many valid arguments formed by myself and by numerous reputable publications:

On 6/8/2022 at 5:18 AM, Weld_E said:

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/02/the-depp-defamation-suit-should-outrage-and-appall-you

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/01/amber-heard-johnny-depp-trial-metoo-backlash

 

https://www.thecut.com/2022/06/johnny-depp-verdict-proves-amber-heards-point.html

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/06/02/depp-heard-verdict-is-gag-order-women/

 

https://time.com/6183505/amber-heard-perfect-victim-myth-johnny-depp/

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/02/arts/depp-heard-trial-malice.html

 

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-depp-heard-verdict-is-chilling

 

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/amber-heard-johnny-depp-verdict-metoo-trial-1361356/

 

https://variety.com/2022/tv/opinion/johnny-depp-amber-heard-verdict-entertainment-1235283022/

 

https://slate.com/human-interest/2022/06/amber-heard-johnny-depp-trial-tiktok-video-conspiracy.html

 

https://www.vice.com/en/article/3ab3yk/daily-wire-amber-heard-johnny-depp

 

I am not surprised an MJ stan sides with Depp though.

[Mobility Mary]

Not MJ fans coming in here to defend Depp

Birds of feather indeed

Edited June 13, 2022 by Mobility Mary

[Zerocoke]

Having watched the entire trial I just don’t understand how anyone here thinks Amber is telling the truth . It’s so easy to see between her lies. 
 

Again I’m not saying Depp is a saint but gosh, I really can’t understand those supporting her this much after watching 3 weeks of trial.

 

The press tour ain’t gonna end well for ha anyway

[Daydream]

If you're so obsessed with MJ then please kindly make a thread to discuss him. As for me, I'll be keen to follow the forum rules and stay on topic in this thread.

 

OT: Amber Heard criminal.

 

[Weld_E]

Once again, I provide almost a dozen articles from reputable sources but Deppsters respond with random pictures to avoid engagement in any form of discussion that requires an ounce of critical thinking skills  

[Sparrow's Bride]

Amber Heard has been crying that she wants to move on but now she’s doing interviews. Looks like she uses moving on and doing interviews synonymously 

 

[Weld_E]

6 minutes ago, Zerocoke said:

I really can’t understand those supporting her this much after watching 3 weeks of trial.

I find it interesting when people have an issue with vocal Amber defenders, but express no concern or annoyance with the loud, dangerous, and aggressive Deppsters throughout this trial.

[Daydream]

1 minute ago, Weld_E said:

Once again, I provide almost a dozen articles from reputable sources but Deppsters respond with random pictures to avoid engagement in any form of discussion that requires an ounce of critical thinking skills  

What do you want people to do? To read these random articles by journalists expressing their OWN opinions, and suddenly change their minds. These journalists opinions aren't worth much more than yours or mine. I mean, one of the articles you shared is literally about a conspiracy theory. No thank you. I'd much rather stick with the FACTS of what was presented in court and the verdict that cold, hard evidence led the jury to.

[Mobility Mary]

9 minutes ago, Zerocoke said:

Having watched the entire trial I just don’t understand how anyone here thinks Amber is telling the truth . It’s so easy to see between her lies. 
 

Again I’m not saying Depp is a saint but gosh, I really can’t understand those supporting her this much after watching 3 weeks of trial.

Having watched the entire trial I just don’t understand how anyone here thinks Johnny is telling the truth . It’s so easy to see between his lies. 
 

Again I’m not saying Amber is a saint but gosh, I really can’t understand those supporting him this much after watching 3 weeks of trial.

https://thegeekbuzz.com/news/83-times-johnny-depp-lied-under-cross-examination-so-far/

[Zerocoke]

2 minutes ago, Weld_E said:

I find it interesting when people have an issue with vocal Amber defenders, but express no concern or annoyance with the loud, dangerous, and aggressive Deppsters throughout this trial.

I do too. But I’m more concerned and annoyed by aggressive Amber defenders because there was a LIVE trial where her lies were exposed. And honestly I’ve tried to be introspective and not be influenced by other people’s reactions&opinions, but man, she lied through her teeth the whole time. It was painful to watch.

 

 

[Mobility Mary]

10 minutes ago, Zerocoke said:

I do too. But I’m more concerned and annoyed by aggressive Amber defenders because there was a LIVE trial where her lies were exposed. And honestly I’ve tried to be introspective and not be influenced by other people’s reactions&opinions, but man, she lied through her teeth the whole time. It was painful to watch.

 

 

Literally what lies? Using pledge/donate interchangeably (also unrelated to the case) is somehow worse than submitting a pic from Orient Express where you have a black eye saying you got the bruise cause your wife hit you while you were on the train only for there to be a photo from 9 days prior with the same mark? Or saying you never headbutted your wife only to change it into being an accident after you realize there's an audio of you admitting it? Looks like Camille's aggressive screaming got you good.

[NausAllien]

MJ stans siding with Depp should suprise no one 

 

Both were talented artists, but terrible human beings who thought their money and power gave them the right to abuse people.

 

[NausAllien]

22 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

Literally what lies? Using pledge/donate interchangeably (also unrelated to the case) is somehow worse than submitting a pic from Orient Express where you have a black eye saying you got the bruise cause your wife hit you while you were on the train only for there to be a photo from 9 days prior with the same mark? Or saying you never headbutted your wife only to change it into being an accident after you realize there's an audio of you admitting it? Looks like Camille's aggressive screaming got you good.

 

But Deppsters lack BASIC critical thinking skills so...

[Raiden]

3 hours ago, Weld_E said:

Once again, I provide almost a dozen articles from reputable sources but Deppsters respond with random pictures to avoid engagement in any form of discussion that requires an ounce of critical thinking skills  

AH crew is like a kindergarten, they don't see responses, then go crying that no one responded to their assertions.

 

I've already responded to the laundry list of "reputable" articles whose links are dumped here. Practically all of them are written by agenda driven peeps: either #metoo activists or narrative-pushing columnists and pundits in the opinion editorials aka op-eds and thinkpiece sides of the media outlets.

 

On the other hand you've got the legal experts, these are peeps who are licensed to practice law, and who BTW are doing two things that those op-ed journos are not doing: namely reporting facts, i.e doing strictly newsy stuff, aka literal journalism + plus providing qualified opinion. They ended up landing overwhelmingly on the jury's side of the verdict. I take the word of such people who know their sh*t, over people who can't know their stuff but may have bigger "clout".

Edited June 13, 2022 by Raiden

[Rogue_Redux]

2 hours ago, Sparrow's Bride said:

Amber Heard has been crying that she wants to move on but now she’s doing interviews. Looks like she uses moving on and doing interviews synonymously 

 

OMFG I LOVE THIS GIF!!  
 

[Rogue_Redux]

I just watched the preview for Amber’s interview with Savannah Guthrie for The Today Show and she sounds even more ridiculous than she already did. Wow no wonder she lost with the jurors. 
 

She’s sadly mistaken if she thinks she will garner any type of sympathy from the GP. 
 

[Raiden]

Also it is very clear from the recorded tapes that AH had some very backward (heavily gendered) idea about the concept of spousal abuse / domestic violence. She thought she could be infinitely violent but that if JD somehow gave her even one headbutt, then that would be enough to make him an abuser and her a victim. She relied too much on the physical power concept: that since the male partner is the one physically stronger, that means (in her delusion) that the law had no choice but declare her a victim automatically no matter how violent and aggressive she was and no matter how restraint JD exhibited. That's how she thought things would pan out — that's also how she acted and behaved. She reckoned JD was fighting with a handicap in this contest while she had a leg-up on him. She f*cked around and found out: it turned out DV is not what she thought it means. Everything has to be taken into account. What happened, who did what to whom, and who went away from whom etc etc. Who escalated, who deescalated. The whole gamut — see the forest from the trees, as they say. That's what the jury did, that's what I did, that's what experts did, that's what the whole world did. We looked at the law and the totality of the facts — and came to the same conclusion, to my own surprise. At the start of the trial I didn't expect this even form myself, never mind the planet.

[Mobility Mary]

2 minutes ago, Raiden said:

Also it is very clear from the recorded tapes that AH had some very backward (heavily gendered) idea about the concept of spousal abuse / domestic violence. She thought she could be infinitely violent but that if JD somehow gave her even one headbutt, then that would be enough to make him an abuser and her a victim. She relied too much on the physical power concept: that since the male partner is the one physically stronger, that means (in her delusion) that the law had no choice but declare her a victim automatically no matter how violent and aggressive she was and no matter how restraint JD exhibited. That's how she thought things would pan out — that's also how she acted and behaved. She reckoned JD was fighting with a handicap in this contest while she had a leg-up on him. She f*cked around and found out: it turned out DV is not what she thought it means. Everything has to be taken into account. What happened, who did what to whom, and who went away from whom etc etc. Who escalated, who deescalated. The whole gamut — see the forest from the trees, as they say. That's what the jury did, that's what I did, that's what experts did, that's what the whole world did. We looked at the law and the totality of the facts — and came to the same conclusion, to my own surprise. At the start of the trial I didn't expect this even form myself, never mind the planet.

I don't even mean this as a shade but why do your posts read out like Trump's Tweets