Jump to content

US Politics 🇺🇸🏛️ (Debates Welcome)


khalyan
Lee!!
Message added by Lee!!,

Reminder that the US Politics Thread is a privilege. In the past, the staff of ATRL has been hesitant of maintaining US politics threads outside of presidential election cycles due to the room for drama and inordinately intense back-and-forth. Be mindful of that. Thread bans from the US Presidential Election 2020 Thread have not been carried over for this thread to give everyone a clean slate. Do not abuse that by ramping up discourse beyond the pale. So, please, be respectful and remember that you do not always need to respond to everyone. 

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Espresso

    2835

  • ClashAndBurn

    1094

  • Communion

    702

  • Kassi

    640

Top Posters In This Topic

19 minutes ago, Espresso said:

 

I mean, I don't doubt this was true at all. Gonna be really interesting to see Dems defend obvious obstruction and election manipulation after how they cried all the way through Ukrainegate in 2019-2020 though :lmao: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ilhan makes one anti-AIPAC comment and years later Republicans still use it as justification for stripping her of her committee assignments while the best defense her Democratic colleagues offer is “Yeah, that was anti-Semitic, but she’s apologized and learning”. :rip: Meanwhile, Boebert has still suffered zero consequences for “Jihad Squad” and insinuating Ilhan had a bomb on her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

can someone explain why La Hunter is back in da news and what about da laptop?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thuggin said:

Ilhan makes one anti-AIPAC comment and years later Republicans still use it as justification for stripping her of her committee assignments while the best defense her Democratic colleagues offer is “Yeah, that was anti-Semitic, but she’s apologized and learning”. :rip: Meanwhile, Boebert has still suffered zero consequences for “Jihad Squad” and insinuating Ilhan had a bomb on her.

It's truly vile 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thuggin said:

Ilhan makes one anti-AIPAC comment and years later Republicans still use it as justification for stripping her of her committee assignments while the best defense her Democratic colleagues offer is “Yeah, that was anti-Semitic, but she’s apologized and learning”. :rip: Meanwhile, Boebert has still suffered zero consequences for “Jihad Squad” and insinuating Ilhan had a bomb on her.

Zionists are mad at Shontel Brown for showing the slightest modicum of support for Ilhan by retweeting AOC’s speech :rip: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Pelosi and Jeffries. How predictable. :bibliahh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dabunique said:

can someone explain why La Hunter is back in da news and what about da laptop?

 

It’s about the gop trying to hurt Joe by going after his son. 
which won’t work out for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ClashAndBurn said:

I mean, I don't doubt this was true at all. Gonna be really interesting to see Dems defend obvious obstruction and election manipulation after how they cried all the way through Ukrainegate in 2019-2020 though :lmao: 

Of course you’d believe a right wing made up talking point that literally has no proof to it just  to trash Biden 💀 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RO KHANNA voting Yes to condemn socialism :ahh: 

 

Even Jayapal voted the right way. Truly the most disappointing Bernie surrogate. And people dare push him as some sort of progressive successor to Bernie? PLEASE! :ahh: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ClashAndBurn said:

RO KHANNA voting Yes to condemn socialism :ahh: 

 

Even Jayapal voted the right way. Truly the most disappointing Bernie surrogate. And people dare push him as some sort of progressive successor to Bernie? PLEASE! :ahh: 

I could understand voting “yes” if you’re in a swingy district….but if you’re D+10 or above and voted no…smh. Ro Khanna, Nancy, Neguse, and many more represent SAFE blue districts. 
 

A couple of surprise “no’s” there I must say. Dan Goldman, and Jahana Hays, who barely won her last race….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Armani? said:

:rip:

Did the House vote to condemn Nazism? Of course not. Improving universal material conditions and not having a stratified system apparently much worse than Nazism.

Edited by Mean Trees
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mean Trees said:

Did the House vote to condemn Nazism? Of course not. Improving universal material conditions and not having a stratified system apparently much worse than Nazism.

The resolution itself is a praise and affirmation of nazism since it uses the "100 gajillion billion million" number from the nazi-written Black Book of Communism. :ahh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Communion said:

The resolution itself is a praise and affirmation of nazism since it uses the "100 gajillion billion million" number from the nazi-written Black Book of Communism. :ahh:

The fact that a majority of Dems voted for this just shows how they're also in league with the GOP with boosting Fascism. I also see that the new Majority leader also voted to condemn socialism. Not a very good look to those in here who continue to talk about ''equality'' but for some reason have no qualms about selling out those who are poor. They're also in a hilarious irony will call those who criticize and withhold support from Dems as ''Fascist enablers''... Well this vote just shows who the true supporters and ''enablers'' of Fascism are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...