Jump to content

The Weeknd to continue not submitting music to Grammys


Recommended Posts

Sharapov
1 hour ago, Daydream said:

The fact that he KEEPS talking about it but pretends like it doesn't bother him. :rip: It clearly does or he wouldn't feel the need to keep making statements about this.

this, he's tired

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • QueenofCopyPaste

    9

  • Stupid Love

    4

  • Arrows

    3

  • dabunique

    3

Da Barbie

not surprised ATRL is taking the side of the white respectability institution over a black man

 

yall are so tiring.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lead Cenobite
16 minutes ago, ProfessorNinja said:

Why are you all more bothered than he is,

 

about his own music?

 

 

While saying "he's pretending to be unbothered, but really is."

 

 

Um, ma'am, yall are the bitter ones

 

9) Tumblr

:clap3:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lyrical.

It was a huge injustice and I hope he KEEPS talking about it.

 

Those of you being so bothered and telling him to shut up are idiotic. Just another black artist annoying white gays will shut down if they speak up. Sad!

Link to post
Share on other sites
eleganceislearned

Good. The Grammys are trash, and I'll trust his opinion as an actual musician in the industry over the stans on here. Like, why defend such a stupid insitution. Most of you guys are probably afraid of them looking meaningless (which they are) because you want them for bragging rights for stan wars. :rip:

Link to post
Share on other sites
QueenofCopyPaste

"Grammys are TRASH "

 

Yet the same users perched about the next thread this year when the nominations are out 

 

:rofl:it's a clockwork

Link to post
Share on other sites
truthteller

going the Frank Ocean route :WAP: now give us another masterpiece :WAP:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lyrical.
46 minutes ago, Mark Rih said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

“HeS StiLl CrYiNg OvEr It!1!1!1!”

 

they probably asked him what he thinks about the rule change. A rule change that was introduced mainly because of him :toofunny3:

Exactly.

 

When he first spoke about it, ATRL was hugely supportive of him, and now that he's ASKED about it and talks about it again, it's "omg shut up he's so bothered and pretends not to be!!1"

 

I definitely think Nicki made several points.

3hAhlVt.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites
Inner Insanity

The way he's still obsessed but pretends to not care is really off-putting. Like

 

anigif_sub-buzz-4157-1574446369-2.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites
dabunique
21 minutes ago, truthteller said:

going the Frank Ocean route :WAP: now give us another masterpiece :WAP:

King's impact even in hibernation 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • #FreeBritney Activist
slw84
1 hour ago, EyesOnMe said:

What difference does it make?

 

They will always have committees even if they rename them.

 

He should have been nominated for ROTY/SOTY and Best Pop solo. After hours was not that great.

 

They didn't "remove" it because of him.

 

and if he was really thinking hard he'd understand that other people benefited from him not being in the categories so then figure out if any foul play was there not necessarily the grammy's itself.

 

He once cherished the grammys and no devalues it because he didn't get what he wanted. Oh well. You still fell into the validation trap at some point.

 

Should have understood YOUR WINS also had political play as well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Oceania
Posted (edited)

Injustice? :rip:

 

The Grammys are free to do whatever tf they want with their own awards. Their house, their rules.

 

It's not their fault if insecure and egomaniac artists glorify and worship their stupid statuettes like their life depended on them. :toofunny3:

Edited by Oceania
Link to post
Share on other sites
Arrows
1 hour ago, Alyssa Edwards said:

Yes.

 

Are you ok ? No it isn't. The shammys is a TELEVISION SHOW. Meant for ratings, not love or respect of music ?! And they're also OPENLY rigged... have you ever done a single research on their history of fraud ???? :ace:

The "Ultimate form of acclaim" is millions of people buying your music, coming to see you live and your favorite artists publicly applauding your talents.

You’re right, it’s a television show, and you’re right that the nominees have been “rigged” in the past in that they have been decided by a small committee. That needed to stop.

 

The winners, however, have never been rigged, it’s literally impossible. It would be a massive PR-catastrophe for Deloitte, the company handling the votes and making sure nothing leaks before the ceremony.
 

Being popular among the people is obviously great, but you can’t argue that it’s a small accolade to be respected and awarded by your literal peers, by professionel musicians. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
45seconds


 

It looked like 1. He was asked and 2. He’s not proclaiming it from mountains tops. If you don’t want to see his opinion on it then you can easily avoid it. ****ing weirdos 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Warclaud

So sweet, he’s sacrificing himself to give Katy a chance :chick3:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ferret

And people have still de audacity to brag about their faves Grammys 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Superbitch

The good Sis is hurt lol keeps going off about it. Grammys are useless and have been rigger for years anyone can win nowadays. They’re used to troll the ones that don’t have them but :clown:

 

2 hours ago, RideOrDie said:

y'all are crazy he has every right to speak up about the injustice and unfair treatment

snubs happen all The time in many different things especially in movies. The best performances and movies are passed over for bigger and high profile ones. Addressing it at first was ok it’s ok to be upset but he keeps talking about it and makes him seem

Entitled. 
 

he doesn’t need them anywyas he’s above them and keeps getting bigger which is rare. His bigger than ever right now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
MAXIMO
2 hours ago, RideOrDie said:

y'all are crazy he has every right to speak up about the injustice and unfair treatment

This. :clap3:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Isaiah

He’s just embarrassing himself at this point :rip:

Link to post
Share on other sites
metalheart

Good, there's nothing embarrassing about finally opening your eyes to grammy corruption whether it happened because you were snubbed or not. Artists are full of themselves, we knew that already. 

I hope others follow suit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
badgirlriri

Sorry but he does seem bitter. :toofunny3: It's not a problem to answer a question, or stay committed to not submitting, I respect it. But:

 

“The trust has been broken for so long between the Grammy organization and artists that it would be unwise to raise a victory flag,”

"the Grammys’ recent admission of corruption will hopefully be a positive move for the future of this plagued award"

 

There's too much underlying resentment for somebody who supposedly doesn't care, and who we know for a fact would be singing a different tunes if they showered AH with noms. I'm a huge fan but :michael:

Link to post
Share on other sites
dirrtydiana
1 hour ago, eleganceislearned said:

Good. The Grammys are trash, and I'll trust his opinion as an actual musician in the industry over the stans on here. Like, why defend such a stupid insitution. Most of you guys are probably afraid of them looking meaningless (which they are) because you want them for bragging rights for stan wars. :rip:

Bingo!

 

To quote Britney “the [scammys] can kiss my ass.” -2007

Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...