Jump to content

TMZ Drags Taylor for Re-Recording Grammy Eligibility


Michael196

Recommended Posts

Thinking Of You
19 minutes ago, M-P-B said:

I mean, why would he even try to outsmart her in the first place... unless he was evil?  :rip:

He’s a businessman. What’s so evil about sealing a deal? :rip:

 

18 minutes ago, Near said:

Genius for what :ahh:

Creating an empire as big as his, becoming one of the most powerful men in the industry, and still collecting multi-million dollar checks. The modern day Clive Davis, I suppose. 

 

18 minutes ago, ALΞX said:

No he’s not. He’s disgusting. 

Well, I’d like to be disgusting then. Imagine having a career as successful as his and being relatively young. 

 

8 minutes ago, kawk said:

IKR 

it's like even if they GIVE her a grammy for re-recording her past albums (which they probably will lbr) Scooter STILL owns your masters and still raking in YOUR money every day. :bibliahh:He still wins no matter what she does lol 

A businessman :cm:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 132
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Gui Blackout

    4

  • Thinking Of You

    4

  • Michael196

    4

  • Starchild

    3

Gui Blackout

I've seen some weird stanning on this site but bootlicking a shady music exec must the weirdest :rip:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Starchild
16 minutes ago, M-P-B said:

I mean, why would he even try to outsmart her in the first place... unless he was evil?  :rip:  if he bought a whole-ass record label just to spite her and "outsmart" her, that automatically makes him a creepy stalker psychopath... you Scooter apologists are VERY weird

Yea im not some delusional Stan that believes hes always after her but these people are human too. He obviously felt some way towards her, if he didnt care, he wouldnt have made it the deal it was. There was no reason Taylor couldn't own her masters. She said she was willing to pay anything, more than scooter. She actually writes and contributes to her records enormously, even without the re recordings and scooter owning the catalog, she is still making a huge amount of money for her old albums sales and streams. She re recorded because she thought it was unfair and had a right to the music she made. Lbr she has been coming up with most of her stuff on her own. Speak now was written just by her and produced.

 

Its sad people take the side of some white rich dude that has been known to be shady and weird towards a lot of people othrr than Taylor. Yea Taylor is also a rich white woman but then Whats the point in trying to make it seem like shes the greedy one and not scooter for wanting to own something he was never involved with to begin with. OTHs say anything these days 

33 minutes ago, Thinking Of You said:

Do Swifties actually believe Scooter is evil or is it simply because he’s a mastermind and he outsmarted Taylor? :dies:

 

The man is a genius. Sorry.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Thinking Of You said:

Do Swifties actually believe Scooter is evil or is it simply because he’s a mastermind and he outsmarted Taylor? :dies:

 

The man is a genius. Sorry.

How he outsmarted Taylor? He literally gave her 7 album releases that she already has. She's gonna boost her career by simply re-recording her albums with a great excuse. Artists would kill for that opportunity. It's not easy coming up to 7 albums in a few years. Unless... you know... it's little quick singles from a writing camp which is not Taylor's case.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Artistofthedecade
13 minutes ago, kawk said:

IKR 

it's like even if they GIVE her a grammy for re-recording her past albums (which they probably will lbr) Scooter STILL owns your masters and still raking in YOUR money every day. :bibliahh:He still wins no matter what she does lol 

Scooter doesn't own masters anymore. Shamrock does. This failed attempt :bibliahh:

 

Looks like he lost by your logic

F9FA41AF-5682-4CED-9A5E-4B71EE4013AC.thu

33 minutes ago, Thinking Of You said:

Do Swifties actually believe Scooter is evil or is it simply because he’s a mastermind and he outsmarted Taylor? :dies:

 

The man is a genius. Sorry.

He bought thr label for 330 million and sold for 300 million (at most). 

 

What a genius. :bibliahh:

7 minutes ago, CREATIVEREBELLION said:

!!! 

 

if she can get a grammy for 10+ year old songs than why doesn't every other big name artist re-record/re-release old ass songs and try to get Grammys? that's just so messy. let other artists, especially BLACK ARTISTS WHO GET SNUBBED EVERY YEAR get their turn in the sun

Because point of re-recordings are not to win a Grammy. 

F9FA41AF-5682-4CED-9A5E-4B71EE4013AC.thu

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, kawk said:

IKR 

it's like even if they GIVE her a grammy for re-recording her past albums (which they probably will lbr) Scooter STILL owns your masters and still raking in YOUR money every day. :bibliahh:He still wins no matter what she does lol 

Miss Sis, those masters are with its days counted. Good luck getting money from them once all the re-recordings are done. :ahh:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Gui Blackout
11 minutes ago, Shelter said:

It is greed and it’s taking a spot from someone else. She had her chance with them. 

 

8 minutes ago, CREATIVEREBELLION said:

!!! 

 

if she can get a grammy for 10+ year old songs than why doesn't every other big name artist re-record/re-release old ass songs and try to get Grammys? that's just so messy. let other artists, especially BLACK ARTISTS WHO GET SNUBBED EVERY YEAR get their turn in the sun

Yall having meltdowns over something that didn't even happen. There was simply a question over eligibility of re-recordings, and it was confirmed they are eligible, that's all. She gave no signal that intends to submit or campaign for nods, and it's highly unlikely that they get a nod anyway since she's already won for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Artistofthedecade
44 minutes ago, RainDreamer said:

TMZ have always been anti-Taylor though. I remember when they randomly made a story out of how her tour sled wasn't moving fast enough, like how pathetic 

 

 

 

 

And this is the same publication tried to find excuses for one of clients of Scooter despite his tour is really selling bad. 

 

 

Looks like Scooter runs TMZ :bibliahh:

Link to post
Share on other sites
peterstyles13
40 minutes ago, Thinking Of You said:

Do Swifties actually believe Scooter is evil or is it simply because he’s a mastermind and he outsmarted Taylor? :dies:

 

The man is a genius. Sorry.

Genius for what? He ended up selling the masters knowing the investment wasn't worth it since Taylor decided to re-record her discography :rip:

OT: Who takes TMZ seriously in 2021?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ScooterMZ twisting the narrative as if Taylor held a gun to the recording committee and made them give her an AOTY for the re-recording... yeah, definitely no hidden agenda

 

no surprised by some stans of the lil' girl rushing in here to defend her handler. this type of boot-licking behaviour is very concerning:

 

6 minutes ago, Thinking Of You said:

He’s a businessman. What’s so evil about sealing a deal? :rip:

 

 

6 minutes ago, Thinking Of You said:

Creating an empire as big as his, becoming one of the most powerful men in the industry, and still collecting multi-million dollar checks. The modern day Clive Davis, I suppose.

 

6 minutes ago, Thinking Of You said:

A businessman :cm:

by that logic do you also go "yassss daddy Jeff Bezos, exploit those filthy amazon workers by making them work 18 hour long days and then paying them a 10 dollars wage, yeah, you go and f*ck them over, show them who's the boss, daddy!"

the way you lot act sanctimonious all the time but  throw all human decency out the window the moment it comes to taylor is truly something else. next time you are in your base crying about swifties never loosening their grip on a certain ponytail don't act surprised why it's happening. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Gui Blackout said:

 

Yall having meltdowns over something that didn't even happen. There was simply a question over eligibility of re-recordings, and it was confirmed they are eligible, that's all. She gave no signal that intends to submit or campaign for nods, and it's highly unlikely that they get a nod anyway since she's already won for it.

Meltdown where? I’m just saying it’s wrong. This is Taylor, course she will submit them :rip:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Starchild
5 minutes ago, Gui Blackout said:

I've seen some weird stanning on this site but bootlicking a shady music exec must the weirdest :rip:

What i dont get is why (just a few) ari stans still do this. Ari herself barely even likes him :skull:

Link to post
Share on other sites
blackoutbaby

Who cares - The Grammy's haven't even been credible in years

 

People just wanna hate on Taylor, but they should be directing their hate towards the academy

Edited by blackoutbaby
Link to post
Share on other sites
Gui Blackout
2 minutes ago, Shelter said:

Meltdown where? I’m just saying it’s wrong. This is Taylor, course she will submit them :rip:

Again, you're creating a narrative that doesn't exist. :rip: She's getting enough nominations (and probably more Grammys) from her new material, she's good.

Link to post
Share on other sites
CREATIVEREBELLION
8 minutes ago, Gui Blackout said:

 

Yall having meltdowns over something that didn't even happen. There was simply a question over eligibility of re-recordings, and it was confirmed they are eligible, that's all. She gave no signal that intends to submit or campaign for nods, and it's highly unlikely that they get a nod anyway since she's already won for it.

we're talking about Taylor. She's gonna submit them lol 

Link to post
Share on other sites
LoveInStereo
47 minutes ago, Thinking Of You said:

Do Swifties actually believe Scooter is evil or is it simply because he’s a mastermind and he outsmarted Taylor? :dies:

 

The man is a genius. Sorry.

A genius would be able to make his own money. When the re-recordings are all out, everything he spent millions on will be rendered obsolete. Taylor can always make new opportunities for herself. He relies on other people completely. He's a leech. Idk why people love mythologizing assholes. He's not a savant, he's just a dick

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Thinking Of You said:

Cringe.

This basically describes your entire existence on this website :)

 

OT: So tasteless, but very transparent.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Starchild
1 minute ago, Thinking Of You said:

I got the girls writing paragraphs :bibliahh:

 

Cringe.

Your always on threads about someone you dislike, took the time to respond to most until you were called out as fighting over a rich white guy vs a rich white woman acting like the man is superior for nothing other than signing a contract but theytr the ones pressed for answering? :skull:at least have some balls to go through with the drag instead of trying to deflect. Cringe 

Link to post
Share on other sites
By the Water
20 minutes ago, postsus said:

How he outsmarted Taylor? He literally gave her 7 album releases that she already has. She's gonna boost her career by simply re-recording her albums with a great excuse. Artists would kill for that opportunity. It's not easy coming up to 7 albums in a few years. Unless... you know... it's little quick singles from a writing camp which is not Taylor's case.

Right? If buying BM was such a genius move why did he re-sell it not even two years after buying it? :rip:

Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...