Angelo Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 If Hollywood Records signs you, will you accept the offer? I'm. just curious. Link to post Share on other sites
TeeJay Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 yes if it's the only record company interested in me. If I have options and offers from other labels, absolutely not. Hollywood records is terrible. Link to post Share on other sites
Bicassie Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 (edited) Ofcourse....why would I turn down an opportunity? If I had other offers than hell no Edited January 13 by Bicassie Link to post Share on other sites
gui Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 1 minute ago, TeeJay said: yes if it's the only record company interested in me. If I have options and offers from other labels, absolutely not. Hollywood records is terrible. This Link to post Share on other sites
Mtjjproducer Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 honestly I would rather be independent that go to HR Link to post Share on other sites
Domination Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 Absolutely not. Make no money on my music and no creative control? No thanks. Link to post Share on other sites
tost1 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 well yes, but they would have no rreason at all to sign me tbh Link to post Share on other sites
naval23 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 Yes! I'll take a $1 million salary and they can mismanage me all they want! Link to post Share on other sites
ProudLBS Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 Considering I sound like a screeching chicken when I sing, they'd most likely be the only label interested in signing me, so yes Link to post Share on other sites
Trash Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 I love music with all my heart but i have no talent or charisma to be a singer/performer, so yeah. I'd take the check and put out some flop album. Link to post Share on other sites
rihannabiggestfan Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 (edited) WAIT, I just realized Grace Potter's latest album wasn't released on Hollywood Records, she's saved! OT: No, I'd rather go Independent (like Bernie, the longest serving Independent member of Congress in American history ) Edited January 13 by rihannabiggestfan Link to post Share on other sites
dooart Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 35 minutes ago, TeeJay said: yes if it's the only record company interested in me. If I have options and offers from other labels, absolutely not. Hollywood records is terrible. 35 minutes ago, Bicassie said: Ofcourse....why would I turn down an opportunity? If I had other offers than hell no this Link to post Share on other sites
popmusicisdead Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 i'd sooner sell my soul to RCA Link to post Share on other sites
PoisonCandy Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 24 minutes ago, ProudLBS said: Considering I sound like a screeching chicken when I sing, they'd most likely be the only label interested in signing me, so yes This Link to post Share on other sites
Beyonnaise Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 No it would literally be better to be indie One of my flop faves ZZ Ward has been rotting on them for years, if she was indie she could have gained more credibility in the rock/alternative world and won Grammys, but she’s tied to a Disney owned label so she’s stayed both a commercial flop and ignored by critics/the alt blogosphere. Link to post Share on other sites
selena_lavigne Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 1 hour ago, ProudLBS said: Considering I sound like a screeching chicken when I sing, they'd most likely be the only label interested in signing me, so yes (low key tru tho) Link to post Share on other sites
J Legend X Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 of course... I rather be a flop with a couple of hundred of thousands than a flop with $100 on my bank account Link to post Share on other sites
rihannabiggestfan Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 21 minutes ago, Beyonnaise said: No it would literally be better to be indie One of my flop faves ZZ Ward has been rotting on them for years, if she was indie she could have gained more credibility in the rock/alternative world and won Grammys, but she’s tied to a Disney owned label so she’s stayed both a commercial flop and ignored by critics/the alt blogosphere. Grace Potter got her first Grammys (as a lead artist) after quitting Hollywood Records come on, ZZ! (love Put the Gun Down - it should have been a breakout hit) Link to post Share on other sites
KillingYourCareer Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 I don't aspire to be a singer so no Link to post Share on other sites
Beyonnaise Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 1 minute ago, rihannabiggestfan said: Grace Potter got her first Grammys (as a lead artist) after quitting Hollywood Records come on, ZZ! (love Put the Gun Down - it should have been a breakout hit) Her debut is phenomenal. She even bagged a Kendrick feature Granted he hadn’t blown up yet. She could gain so much exposure as an indie artist but with every new droplet single since her last album it feels like they’re still hoping for a long shot hit that will never happen Link to post Share on other sites
ReverseWarholian Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 (edited) They're the worst label and I'd rather be independent until I found a better offer Edited January 13 by ReverseWarholian Link to post Share on other sites
FreeXone Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 Yes since Im getting old and need to take what I can get. But if I had other offers. HELL NO. Link to post Share on other sites
Luckitty Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 no, they’re the worst label I’ve ever seen Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts