It's obvious her team has been trying to market her as the next Britney spears, but her personality is so unlikable.

I love seeing today's pop girls take inspiration from the undisputed Princess of Pop. What bothers me is when they pretend it wasn't intentional or don't bring anything personal to it. That's what GaGa did so well, she made those influences her own.

Not one original bone in her body. She is no artist and all she does is copy Britney's legacy/looks, etc.

How sad for this new generation that gets Tate when we had Britney Spears at her prime

On 8/7/2026 at 4:50 AM, IVY said:

It's obvious her team has been trying to market her as the next Britney spears, but her personality is so unlikable.

THIS. Plus the fact that she has no artistry and literally copies everything Britney has done Not likable at all

On 8/2/2026 at 2:24 PM, Cheers said:

Britney impact!

Britney was never a label puppet. Everyone that worked with her before the conservatorship said how in control she was with her career, her music videos were a lot of her ideas, etc. but you tried it.

Tate's "legacy" if you can even say she will have one, will be nothing more than a not as good wanna-be Britney clone.

On 8/2/2026 at 3:12 PM, Kurt Hummel said:

The concept of an Addison Rae stan making a thread about someone ripping off Britney Something about stones from a glass house. The whole Tate vs. Addison turf war over which C-list popstar is allowed to be a second-rate Britney makes no sense

Addison is actually a Britney fan and doesn't copy her career as much as Tate does, and she actually admits she's a fan and gives credit to Britney. Unlike Tate who wants to copy everything Britney has ever done and then act like she wasn't a fan of her sure jan!

On 8/7/2026 at 12:55 AM, angelduuh said:

All of the current girls are inspired by Britney. Including Addison. The main reason I like Adisson is bc she is inspired HEAVILY by Britney.

Addison is inspired without copying Britney. Tate is inspired to copy everything Britney has done instead of being an actual artist.

On 8/2/2026 at 6:32 PM, Paultea said:

so... every single pop star ever is not an artist then?

On 8/3/2026 at 4:34 AM, JayG said:

Any pop star that HAS their OWN VISION and then DIRECTS THEIR TEAM TO MAKE THAT VISION A REALITY is an artist.

Any pop star that DOES NOT have their OWN VISION and DEPENDS ON A TEAM/LABEL TO CRAFT A VISION FOR THEM is a product.

To me the 'artistry' discussion on here is interesting. For instance, what separates Björk from Madonna despite them inhabiting the pop sphere?

9 hours ago, BjorkIsMyMom said:

To me the 'artistry' discussion on here is interesting. For instance, what separates Björk from Madonna despite them inhabiting the pop sphere?

Both women have their own vision. In the context of being an artist, nothing separates them but their own unique vision and talent.

17 hours ago, JustHoran said:

Addison is actually a Britney fan and doesn't copy her career as much as Tate does, and she actually admits she's a fan and gives credit to Britney. Unlike Tate who wants to copy everything Britney has ever done and then act like she wasn't a fan of her sure jan!

17 hours ago, JustHoran said:

Addison is inspired without copying Britney. Tate is inspired to copy everything Britney has done instead of being an actual artist.

I have to believe this is some form of psychosis or trolling cos there's no way you believe this, when Addison is directly recreating Britney's looks and even her street style.