Jump to content

Katy destroys Australian fashion business. Nun-gate part 2?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

katy-perry-reignited-trademark-feud-2689

 

Quote

The Grammy-nominated singer, 40, has been locked in a trademark feud with the style guru by the same name since 2009. However, the Down Under couturier was born Katie Perry. The "I Kissed a Girl" songbird's legal name is Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson.

Quote

Australian Katie tells The Post, "I have lost everything, including my trademark. As you can imagine I'm devastated."

 

She continued, "My label has been a dream of mine since I was 11 years old and now that dream that I have worked so hard for, since 2006, has been taken away. What do I do now? I will dust myself off and figure what the next steps are. Perhaps move to somewhere in the world where the name Katie Perry has no meaning."

Quote

She also recalled one painful moment during the trial when she was forced to read emails between the singer and her manager where Perry called the designer a "dumb b–ch."

Source

Edited by glitch
  • Like 4
  • Haha 2

Posted

Katy is also in a legal dispute with an 84 year old veteran over the sale of his $15M mansion. He agreed to sell his home to the singer but changed his mind and she's determined to get her paws on it

 

carl-westcott-suing-katy-perry-49174959.

Posted

Well the woman sued her first FIVE YEARS after the Prismatic Tour because she said that the merch infringed on her copyright. Be a dumb greedy ***** and find out I guess. 

  • Like 10
Posted

Katy Perry, please stop.

Posted

Worst MPG of all time. Literally everything about her is a mess 

  • Like 16
  • Thumbs Down 7
Posted

She (KATY PERRY) is so pathetic. 

  • Like 5
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted
Quote

She also recalled one painful moment during the trial when she was forced to read emails between the singer and her manager where Perry called the designer a "dumb b–ch."

Maybe Kesha and Gaga were right about Katy being mean after all :lakitu:

  • Like 14
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Justice for Ryn Weaver :lakitu:

 

Posted
39 minutes ago, Sugar-Rush said:

Maybe Kesha and Gaga were right about Katy being mean after all :lakitu:

Given her obsession with chart success and that embarrassing talk with Stevie Nicks about rivals, are we surprised? And the nun controversy shows God isn't the one on Katheryn's side

 

Random Thoughts 2.0 | Page 3139 | The Popjustice Forum

  • Like 11
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted (edited)

She has destroyed a lot lately: 

 

- A nun and her home

- Her career 

- Her morals 

- Greatest Love of All 

- The US election 

- Little entrepreneurs (to sell some horrible shoes)

- And the ears of millions around the globe

 

She should be labelled as a terrorist and condemned for her crimes against humanity. 

 

Also brave of her calling someone a dumb b when she's not the brightest cookie out there. 

Edited by alexrex
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 5
  • Haha 6
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted

She needs to have some income I guess 

  • Haha 2
Posted

I thought it was going to be because she wore one of their items and sales dropped or something:rip: 

  • Haha 4
Posted

At least she survived unlike some of her other victims 

  • Haha 1
Posted

At this point I can't remember the last time Katy Perry had GOOD PR… :rip:

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)

The court mentioned that Katy Perry had sent a "cease and desist" letter to Ms Taylor, who sells clothes under her birth name Katie Perry, before suggesting they come to a "coexistence agreement".
 

"Ms Taylor rejected that offer of a coexistence agreement, which, as circumstances turned out, would have been an excellent outcome for both parties," the judgment said.
 

"Having rejected the offer, Ms Taylor then chose to commence infringement proceedings ... In that sense, Ms Taylor has brought this result on herself. Unfortunately, it is no longer possible to return to the time of peaceful coexistence."
theguardian.com/music/2024/nov/22/katy-perry-appeal-legal-case-sydney-fashion-label-katie-perry

Edited by Nefertiti0
  • Like 4
Posted

Katie Taylor waited till enough clothing and merchandise have been sold on Australian soil.

 

Quote

Sydney designer Katie Jane Taylor, who sells clothes under her birth name Katie Perry , sued the singer in October 2019 because the performer was selling her own merchandise.

 

Perry, whose real name is Katheryn Hudson, on Friday successfully appealed the 2023 federal court findings that her firm, Kitty Purry, had engaged in trademark infringement during the 2014 Australian tour.

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2024/nov/22/katy-perry-appeal-legal-case-sydney-fashion-label-katie-perry

She tried to ride Katy's coattails after she knew that Katy Perry has become famous.

 

Quote

"Last week was the end of one of the biggest battle of my business career, The "David and Goliath case" – legal action against the singer, Katy Perry, for infringing my Katie Perry trade mark in Australia – which I've held since 29th September 2008," the Aussie Katie wrote in a blog post in 2022.

She got a trade mark after the Summer of 2008.

 

3VdRSPw.jpeg

https://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/completelist/0,29569,1834301,00.html

 

7j2Qqd5.jpeg

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/music/g20916017/best-songs-of-the-summer-2008/

 

Quote

"As the fame of one grew internationally, the other became aware of her namesake and filed a trademark application."

 

Perry had used her name as a trademark in good faith during the 2014 Prism tour and had been doing so five years before Taylor launched her own business, the judges noted.

 

The Katie Perry trademark had been applied for when Taylor already knew of the singer's reputation, the judges found.

The thief tried to play victim.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
54 minutes ago, Nefertiti0 said:

The court mentioned that Katy Perry had sent a "cease and desist" letter to Ms Taylor, who sells clothes under her birth name Katie Perry, before suggesting they come to a "coexistence agreement".
 

"Ms Taylor rejected that offer of a coexistence agreement, which, as circumstances turned out, would have been an excellent outcome for both parties," the judgment said.
 

"Having rejected the offer, Ms Taylor then chose to commence infringement proceedings ... In that sense, Ms Taylor has brought this result on herself. Unfortunately, it is no longer possible to return to the time of peaceful coexistence."
theguardian.com/music/2024/nov/22/katy-perry-appeal-legal-case-sydney-fashion-label-katie-perry

Oop. Looks like ms Taylor is the Regina George in sheep's clothing 

 

EQbz2UO.thumb.gif.d4f2600427c866a8da99f9d51aa7ed37.gif

  • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.