Happylittlepunk Posted June 18, 2023 Posted June 18, 2023 Yes because Bruno wanted Beyoncé to win album of the year.
Jude Posted June 18, 2023 Posted June 18, 2023 Duh, it's f*cking Bruno Mars. Even his fart sounds could get a Grammy.
Sazare Posted June 18, 2023 Posted June 18, 2023 Doubtful. These awards are usually bought, or are, at the very least, heavily campaigned for. If you don’t want these awards you don’t get them (unless your name is Adele), and it’s clear Bruno and Anderson didn’t want it.
byzantium Posted June 18, 2023 Posted June 18, 2023 (edited) Probably. The Grammys love nothing more than to give Bruno Marks Grammys. The most quintessential grammy darling of the last decade. Edited June 18, 2023 by byzantium
CaptainMusic Posted June 18, 2023 Posted June 18, 2023 14 minutes ago, byzantium said: Probably. The Grammys love nothing more than to give Bruno Marks Grammys. The most quintessential grammy darling of the last decade. And the most undeserving too At least with Adele and Taylor could use their huge success and decent/good songwriting to explain it But Bruno is a glorified tribute act, including Silk Sonic. There is nothing original or creative about him which is why he still doesn’t have a huge fanbase after all these years, yet he probably would’ve won again if he had been nominated.
aesthetic bih Posted June 19, 2023 Posted June 19, 2023 Yes, that Sonic album is 100% Grammy bait and what's even funnier is the committee would've taken the bait on that one.
Recommended Posts