Jump to content

Antman 3 is second marvel movie to get a rotten score on RT


Recommended Posts

Posted

Btw Antman have 3 movies while we still don’t know of Wanda is alive to make a movie :rip:

Marvel is truly the pits.

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Roman Holiday

    7

  • Gorjesspazze9

    7

  • BNF91

    6

  • GraceRandolph

    6

Posted

I don't follow Marvel or really care too much about what they're doing to the movie industry but jesus christ this movie is abysmal :deadbanana4: It looked really cheap and ugly, the acting was so flat, the villains were just laughable (especially the stupid floating head) and it was just really boring to watch. Definitely never watching another superhero movie if this is the standard :skull:

Posted

Eternals was WAYYY better 

Posted (edited)

Wbk.

 

Paul Rudd single-handedly carries the Ant-man series, but the overall series is boring with a boring cast and with non-memorable characters. It also doesn’t help that the actor for Kang is a butter face :rip:

Edited by fijitears
Posted

I hate to say it… but introducing these new young characters was a bad idea. Cassie & America suck. Will not be surprised if they **** up Wiccan in the Agatha series too.

Posted
3 minutes ago, fijitears said:

It also doesn’t help that the actor for Kang is a butter face :rip:

The disrespect :biblio:

 

EBONY_FEB_COVER_JONATHAN-MAJORS_0192v2.jpg

Posted (edited)

Anyway the binary system of RT is so wrong and stupid. It's like i like it or i don't like without a scale.

 

For this kind of mainstream  blockbuster for families can make sense cause it's like the movie is entertaining or is not (this is why 90% of critics are talking about for these kind of movies). My problem is when people start with "Babylon has a 55%, this new Scorsese movie has a 50% so it's bad"... NO. how a binary system can tell you if the movie is really bad or is just divisive, so for a lot of people is not only "I like it" but they even think "this is a masterpiece".. some art can really be divisive but what people get is not "55% is divisive" but "55% so is bad". Really unfair system. 

 

 

Edited by vale9001
Posted

I saw it last weekend, honestly I was entertained and was worth my money. I do believe the quality has decreased and the public is tired of the constant releasing.

Posted
2 hours ago, Hephaestus said:

The disrespect :biblio:

 

EBONY_FEB_COVER_JONATHAN-MAJORS_0192v2.jpg

Great body, beautiful body

 

His face is very average.

Posted
2 hours ago, fijitears said:

It also doesn’t help that the actor for Kang is a butter face :rip:

Nonsense, he's gorgeous.

Posted
3 hours ago, Hephaestus said:

The disrespect :biblio:

 

EBONY_FEB_COVER_JONATHAN-MAJORS_0192v2.jpg

That’s my baby daddy :bird:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.