Jump to content

Gaga transition from music to film going viral | Indiewire weighs in.


Link16

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Jude said:

People are dumb. You don't blame the actors for their panned movie unless the critics dragged their acting, blame the director. Dumb*ss*s. 

The funny thing is, they'll see 1-2 negative reviews and run the narrative that they're panned. Failing too see the other 200+ with positive comments and wide praise. :ahh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 383
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Ethereaaal

    28

  • Marry Illusion Glory

    25

  • Leptine

    23

  • EnigmaticAndroid

    18

1 minute ago, Link16 said:

Dreamgirls (film)

Budget $75–80 million

Box office $155.4 million

 

House of Gucci

Budget $75 million

Box office $154.3 million

 

one of them was a hit and the other one a flop? :deadbanana4:

And Gucci was released while theaters were still recovering from Covid. :deadbanana4:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, hausofdave said:

jesus stop lying for gods sake and do some research :deadbanana4:

 

where was it red?

 

spacer.png

 

how was nabbing the highest adult opening for a drama a flop? and making almost 2x its budget back a commercial failure? if so, tell us what adult R rated drama or further yet, any drama film released the pass two years that has reached or surprass HOG’s BO numbers. not even the year’s most prestige & upcoming award’s contender film, EEAAO, has reached it, so please tell us how’s its a flop :rip:

 

spacer.png 

 

spacer.png

62 is nothing to brag about. The general consensus remained it wasn’t a good movie. I personally enjoyed most of it.

It barely made any money then. It wasn’t a total flop. I stand corrected 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Blue Rose said:

62 is nothing to brag about. The general consensus remained it wasn’t a good movie. I personally enjoyed most of it.

It barely made any money then. It wasn’t a total flop. I stand corrected 

Then learn to shut up about things you don't know making about.  You don't go making big claims and you don't have anything to back it up.:ahh:

 

OT: Can't wait for J:FAD. I'm sure the Lions are excited too. :heart2:

Edited by Ethereaaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Link16 said:

Dreamgirls (film)

Budget $75–80 million

Box office $155.4 million

 

House of Gucci

Budget $75 million

Box office $154.3 million

 

one of them was a hit and the other one a flop? :deadbanana4:

What is this supposed to do? That both performed similarly? That both barely made any money? I absolutely do not care

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Blue Rose said:

What is this supposed to do? That both performed similarly? That both barely made any money? I absolutely do not care

Use your brain, and understand that one happened during the height of the pandemic. :ahh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ethereaaal said:

Then learn to shut up about things you don't know about. :ahh:

 

OT: Can't wait for J:FAD. I'm sure the Lions are excited too. :heart2:

How very mature! If you can’t have a conversation then change your mind, then get the **** out of here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Blue Rose said:

How very mature! If you can’t have a conversation then change your mind, then get the **** out of here. 

Why should I? Am I not the Gaga stan here? :ahh: Also, I'm open to changing my mind, but I need someone who can back up what they say, not a loud empty tin can.

Edited by Ethereaaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Blue Rose said:

62 is nothing to brag about. The general consensus remained it wasn’t a good movie. I personally enjoyed most of it.

It barely made any money then. It wasn’t a total flop. I stand corrected 

you said panned, it was fresh, you said flop, doubled the budget. Learn to use words correctly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Link16 said:

you said panned, it was fresh, you said flop, doubled the budget. Learn to use words correctly

The movie is barely fresh. It’s 62. Isn’t 59 rotten? :toofunny2:

doubling the budget is literally the bare minimum too :rip: 

House Of Gucci is closer to “panned flop” than it is to “critical smash”

 

spacer.png

Edited by Blue Rose
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Link16 said:

you said panned, it was fresh, you said flop, doubled the budget. Learn to use words correctly

giphy.gif

 

b-b-but, it's almost not a hit!!!11

Edited by Artur
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Artur said:

giphy.gif

 

b-b-but, it's almost not a hit!!!11

If you subtract three from its RT Critics Score, and delete all the audience reivews, it's PANNED!!!11!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ethereaaal said:

Why should I? Am I not the Gaga stan here? :ahh:

Reading comprehension. You should leave because you are incapable of having a mature conversation where people are allowed to correct their opinions. Not because you are a Gaga fan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ethereaaal said:

If you subtract three from its RT Critics Score, and delete all the audience reivews, it's PANNED!!!11!!!

If you ignore the fact that it double its budget, it's a commercial failure too!

 

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Blue Rose said:

Reading comprehension. You should leave because you are incapable of having a mature conversation where people are allowed to correct their opinions. Not because you are a Gaga fan

How brave of you, considering how you've been doing in this thread. :ahh: THE AUDACITY.

Edited by Ethereaaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Blue Rose said:

The movie is barely fresh. It’s 62. Isn’t 59 rotten? :toofunny2:

doubling the budget is literally the bare minimum too :rip: 

House Of Gucci is closer to “panned flop” than it is to “critical smash”

 

spacer.png

At least Gaga wasn’t totally eclipsed by her co-star. 
 

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Her chops seem legit

 

Slightly unrelated but why were Her tattoos not covered for that seated pic as patrizia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Blue Rose said:

The movie is barely fresh. It’s 62. Isn’t 59 rotten? :toofunny2:

doubling the budget is literally the bare minimum too :rip: 

House Of Gucci is closer to “panned flop” than it is to “critical smash”

 

spacer.png

THIS IS PANNED

 

DON'T WORRY DARLING

32%

 

THIS IS A FLOP MOVIE

 

Nightmare Alley (2021)

Budget $60 million

Box office $39.6 million

 

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Artur said:

If you ignore the fact that it double its budget, it's a commercial failure too!

 

giphy.gif

We love IGNORANCE! :heart2:

 

spacer.png

Edited by Ethereaaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:clap3:Not everyone can be Gaga. Some pop girls have tried multiple times, but FAILED and PANNED. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said:

At least Gaga wasn’t totally eclipsed by her co-star. 
 

spacer.png

And Im happy for Jennifer Hudson. She deserved it. The part was written to shine and she delivered :heart:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"An album with 82 on MC is closer to generally favorable than it is to critically acclaimed"

 

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Artur said:

If you ignore the fact that it double its budget, it's a commercial failure too!

 

giphy.gif

Doubling the movie budget means it has recouped its marketing costs, doesn’t mean it was making a profit :rip: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.