movie Shotgun Wedding | #1 WW on Prime Video | Jennifer Lopez, Jennifer Coolidge, Duhamel

[Bloodflowers.]

11 hours ago, A.R.L said:

#611

Jennifer Lopez

$1,447,303,961

35

$41,351,542

 

How and when? 

 

https://m.the-numbers.com/box-office-star-records/domestic/lifetime-acting/top-grossing-stars/601

 

This is domestic, it's not even internatinal. Also, not the box office I'm talking about, she could score millions more at the box office with whomever she's taking the lead on, but she still won't be taken seriously as an actress, because she's not one and that's my main point I was trying to say in the other post in response to why she doesn't do better roles as if this was something to do with jlo herself. 

 

No Marvel payola  the way "I'm Glad" hitmaker makes you this angry

 

[A.R.L]

7 hours ago, reymiu said:

I guess your fave actresses are blonde white actresses who appear in seious films like Gwyneth Paltrow, Michelle Williams etc ?

Why do you assume that? Just because I brought up the fact that Jlo isn't a serious actress? 

 

7 hours ago, reymiu said:

 

As if a Latina actress like JLo had those same opportunities !

 

Atrl is too obsessed with race. It has nothing to do with race in this case.

 

7 hours ago, reymiu said:

Hollywood wants her to be a typical Latin bombshell. Either she plays those roles or she doesn't get cast (has no job)... Period ! Name me one Latina actress who is respected in Hollywood and appears in those respected Oscar drama .... I can only think of Penelope Cruz and she only has respected roles in Spanish movies - Penelope Cruz's Hollywood movies are Pirates of the Caribean, Gothika, Nine etc

 

Remember Selma Hayek who was JLo's peer .... And who actually got an Oscar nomination for appearing in respected dramas ? Where is she now? What movies is she doing now?

Penelope isn't latina btw, she's considered a white European. Salma turned down many roles to devote her time to her family. But she IS an example of a serious actress with talent that I'm talking about. 

 

Now, since you asked, there is more than one well respected latina actress in hollywood like Sofía Vergara, Rita Moreno, Mercedes Ruehl, Lupita Nyong'o, Ariana DeBose and I'm sure there are more names out there.

 

That said, racism exists in hollywood as much as any other part of the world, but in jlo's case, that's just not true. 

 

[insomniac]

On 12/11/2022 at 2:48 AM, reymiu said:

I guess your fave actresses are blonde white actresses who appear in seious films like Gwyneth Paltrow, Michelle Williams etc ?

 

As if a Latina actress like JLo had those same opportunities !

 

Hollywood wants her to be a typical Latin bombshell. Either she plays those roles or she doesn't get cast (has no job)... Period ! Name me one Latina actress who is respected in Hollywood and appears in those respected Oscar drama .... I can only think of Penelope Cruz and she only has respected roles in Spanish movies - Penelope Cruz's Hollywood movies are Pirates of the Caribean, Gothika, Nine etc

 

Remember Selma Hayek who was JLo's peer .... And who actually got an Oscar nomination for appearing in respected dramas ? Where is she now? What movies is she doing now?

That member @A.R.L really thought they made several points by posting that link with the box office chart with Top Grossing Stars Domestically, in which “the figures represent the total amount of domestic revenue generated by all the movies a star has appeared in over their lifetime.”
 

Looking at J.Lo’s number and putting it away like it’s some ‘horrible’ box office achievement is ridiculous, as they’re actually awesome box office numbers. That list includes everyone and their mother who showed up for only a 3 minute scene in a 3 hour Marvel movie that grossed a ****-ton at the box office, even adding that to their box office totals. And funnily, to @reymiu's point, “serious” actresses like Michelle Williams are still listed below her on that chart.

 

Then, in an earlier post the member @A.R.L inferred people only showed up to J.Lo’s movies anyway because of her co-stars being huge and them drawing the crowds vs. Jennifer herself. Perhaps, instead of pulling up the box office chart above, they instead should’ve pulled up below chart which makes more sense in line of their leading actor/actress argument. 
 

Top 100 Stars in Leading Roles at the Domestic Box Office 

 

“This chart contains the top 100 box office stars based on the cumulative domestic box office of all the movies a star has had a leading role in over their lifetime.”

 

187	Drew Barrymore	$1,065,438,493	31	$34,368,984
188	Jennifer Lopez	$1,063,853,837	27	$39,401,994
189	Jake Gyllenhaal	$1,060,102,198	31	$34,196,845

 

https://m.the-numbers.com/box-office-star-records/domestic/lifetime-acting/top-grossing-leading-stars/101

 

She’s positioned beautifully between other leading Hollywood icons like Drew Barrymore and Jake Gyllenhaal with $1.064 Billion and that after having been a leading actress in 4 less films then both Drew or Jake. That’s amazing!!

 

Take the Top 400 actors and actresses from this whole chart, remove all the male actors from it and she’s at #47 which is really good!! Below her are some of Hollywood’s fave Oscar and Golden Globe winning actresses (of which two were her co-lead) Glenn Close, Annette Bening, Diane Keaton, Jamie Lee Curtis, Salma Hayek, Viola Davis, Halle Berry, Michelle Williams, Renee Zellweger, Barbra Streisand, dame Maggie Smith, Jane Fonda, Helen Mirren and I could go on and on… 

 

Rank	Name	Domestic Box Office	Movies	Average
1	Scarlett Johansson	$5,289,001,669	34	$155,558,873
2	Zoe Saldana	$3,996,073,810	30	$133,202,460
3	Emma Watson	$3,047,882,981	15	$203,192,199
4	Elizabeth Olsen	$2,869,508,711	15	$191,300,581
5	Letitia Wright	$2,855,685,055	12	$237,973,755
6	Karen Gillan	$2,742,983,361	15	$182,865,557
7	Danai Gurira	$2,647,058,826	5	$529,411,765
8	Sandra Bullock	$2,616,948,145	34	$76,969,063
9	Jennifer Lawrence	$2,594,808,492	24	$108,117,021
10	Gwyneth Paltrow	$2,480,583,070	20	$124,029,154
11	Julia Roberts	$2,467,054,386	36	$68,529,289
12	Cameron Diaz	$2,466,609,332	28	$88,093,190
13	Natalie Portman	$2,438,247,847	33	$73,886,298
14	Daisy Ridley	$2,188,664,563	7	$312,666,366
15	Lupita Nyong'o	$2,187,603,433	10	$218,760,343
16	Meryl Streep	$2,051,507,994	50	$41,030,160
17	Pom Klementieff	$1,930,022,716	5	$386,004,543
18	Angela Bassett	$1,770,497,726	15	$118,033,182
19	Reese Witherspoon	$1,754,006,467	36	$48,722,402
20	Carrie Fisher	$1,682,672,124	7	$240,381,732
21	Kristen Stewart	$1,674,088,712	28	$59,788,883
22	Michelle Pfeiffer	$1,631,706,659	35	$46,620,190
23	Nicole Kidman	$1,592,530,568	53	$30,047,747
24	Anne Hathaway	$1,545,671,614	31	$49,860,375
25	Rachel McAdams	$1,536,909,884	22	$69,859,540
26	Brie Larson	$1,521,717,964	11	$138,337,997
27	Keira Knightley	$1,512,813,235	27	$56,030,120
28	Angelina Jolie	$1,475,042,568	23	$64,132,286
29	Cate Blanchett	$1,457,748,449	28	$52,062,445
30	Kristen Bell	$1,364,628,228	20	$68,231,411
31	Jennifer Aniston	$1,356,297,754	31	$43,751,540
32	Amy Adams	$1,347,401,928	20	$67,370,096
33	Charlize Theron	$1,300,099,580	32	$40,628,112
34	Evangeline Lilly	$1,255,633,266	7	$179,376,181
35	Michelle Rodriguez	$1,200,855,510	17	$70,638,559
36	Emma Thompson	$1,178,613,529	19	$62,032,291
37	Kristen Wiig	$1,163,944,253	19	$61,260,224
38	Bryce Dallas Howard	$1,161,989,621	8	$145,248,703
39	Emily Blunt	$1,157,923,481	27	$42,886,055
40	Kate Winslet	$1,147,497,853	29	$39,568,891
41	Gal Gadot	$1,093,992,159	9	$121,554,684
42	Zendaya	$1,090,641,332	9	$121,182,370
43	Emma Stone	$1,085,531,350	16	$67,845,709
44	Beyoncé Knowles	$1,074,336,242	8	$134,292,030
45	Queen Latifah	$1,068,684,356	18	$59,371,353
46	Drew Barrymore	$1,065,438,493	31	$34,368,984
47	Jennifer Lopez	$1,063,853,837	27	$39,401,994
48	Jada Pinkett Smith	$1,039,071,046	10	$103,907,105
49	Bette Midler	$1,009,784,131	26	$38,837,851
50	Demi Moore	$993,932,853	27	$36,812,328
51	Melissa McCarthy	$988,967,475	16	$61,810,467
52	Meg Ryan	$981,956,678	28	$35,069,881
53	Holly Hunter	$980,166,187	9	$108,907,354
54	Florence Kasumba	$953,448,821	2	$476,724,411
55	Rachel Weisz	$946,875,572	26	$36,418,291
56	Catherine Zeta-Jones	$943,350,739	19	$49,650,039
57	Helena Bonham Carter	$924,571,944	29	$31,881,791
58	Jodie Foster	$922,319,212	24	$38,429,967
59	Glenn Close	$915,791,898	25	$36,631,676
60	Margot Robbie	$904,663,297	19	$47,613,858
61	Laurence Fishburne	$901,229,508	23	$39,183,892
62	Susan Sarandon	$899,711,113	51	$17,641,394
63	Annette Bening	$880,785,446	24	$36,699,394
64	Ellen DeGeneres	$879,630,002	3	$293,210,001
65	Idina Menzel	$878,326,587	2	$439,163,294
66	Elizabeth Banks	$876,107,951	21	$41,719,426
67	Tilda Swinton	$875,614,150	24	$36,483,923
68	Sigourney Weaver	$875,129,961	38	$23,029,736
69	Diane Keaton	$873,180,354	37	$23,599,469
70	Kate Beckinsale	$870,575,707	23	$37,851,118
71	Sarah Vowell	$870,022,836	2	$435,011,418
72	Jamie Lee Curtis	$856,662,365	14	$61,190,169
73	Salma Hayek	$856,365,598	27	$31,717,244
74	Amanda Seyfried	$850,549,816	23	$36,980,427
75	Jessica Alba	$850,539,415	18	$47,252,190
76	Hayden Christensen	$849,664,948	13	$65,358,842
77	Viola Davis	$837,815,266	13	$64,447,328
78	Megan Fox	$837,508,810	16	$52,344,301
79	Tessa Thompson	$830,826,185	11	$75,529,653
80	Anna Kendrick	$793,626,703	25	$31,745,068
81	Halle Berry	$786,255,939	19	$41,381,892
82	Regina Hall	$783,736,786	20	$39,186,839
83	Goldie Hawn	$767,977,695	21	$36,570,366
84	Barbra Streisand	$763,506,856	10	$76,350,686
85	Anna Faris	$763,268,144	15	$50,884,543
86	Renée Zellweger	$754,862,831	22	$34,311,947
87	Jordana Brewster	$751,545,691	8	$93,943,211
88	Michelle Williams	$744,040,470	21	$35,430,499
89	Maggie Smith	$737,343,244	19	$38,807,539
90	Kelly Marie Tran	$733,473,229	3	$244,491,076
91	Julie Walters	$721,029,985	11	$65,548,180
92	Monica Barbaro	$718,519,000	2	$359,259,500
93	Mindy Kaling	$701,593,144	4	$175,398,286
94	Julianne Moore	$689,621,776	41	$16,820,043
95	Diane Lane	$683,910,060	26	$26,304,233
96	Jennifer Garner	$681,468,309	16	$42,591,769
97	Hailee Steinfeld	$671,459,154	13	$51,650,704
98	Penélope Cruz	$669,449,550	22	$30,429,525
99	Awkwafina	$668,364,173	13	$51,412,629
100	Rebel Wilson	$666,841,674	13	$51,295,513
101	Marisa Tomei	$656,243,205	15	$43,749,547
102	Keri Russell	$655,480,427	8	$81,935,053
103	Jane Fonda	$648,033,213	23	$28,175,357
104	Chloë Grace Moretz	$646,244,242	26	$24,855,548
105	Selena Gomez	$643,322,376	12	$53,610,198
106	Elizabeth Debicki	$635,741,567	8	$79,467,696
107	Felicity Jones	$635,483,142	14	$45,391,653
108	Gwendoline Christie	$631,010,296	4	$157,752,574
109	Rose Byrne	$624,517,112	16	$39,032,320
110	Helen Mirren	$623,329,819	27	$23,086,290
111	Eva Green	$619,505,938	17	$36,441,526
112	Whoopi Goldberg	$618,153,791	26	$23,775,146
113	Katherine Heigl	$615,369,331	18	$34,187,185
114	Mila Kunis	$614,021,862	15	$40,934,791
115	Octavia Spencer	$609,342,361	16	$38,083,898
116	Julie Andrews	$607,579,874	15	$40,505,325
117	Blythe Danner	$601,892,868	7	$85,984,695
118	Isla Fisher	$596,840,120	16	$37,302,508
119	Amy Poehler	$595,771,433	12	$49,647,619
120	Gemma Chan	$591,700,103	2	$295,850,052
121	Maya Rudolph	$579,970,503	17	$34,115,912
122	Kirsten Dunst	$570,447,087	26	$21,940,273
123	Taraji P. Henson	$570,418,727	14	$40,744,195
124	Tiffany Haddish	$568,870,108	14	$40,633,579
125	Lake Bell	$557,975,845	10	$55,797,585
126	Zoë Kravitz	$556,725,223	11	$50,611,384
127	Rebecca Ferguson	$553,752,113	8	$69,219,014
128	Brittany Snow	$552,082,794	17	$32,475,458

 

Point being made, she is still one of the Top 100 Hollywood Leading Actresses at the Domestic Box Office, whether she has won Golden Globes/Oscars or not and whether you like her or not.

Edited December 12, 2022 by insomniac

[A.R.L]

40 minutes ago, insomniac said:

That list includes everyone and their mother who showed up for only a 3 minute scene in a 3 hour Marvel movie that grossed a ****-ton at the box office, 

 

You're aware of the fact that there are actors with minor supporting roles that have made a bigger impact, right? Therefore, that list I posted is still valid.

 

45 minutes ago, insomniac said:

Then, in an earlier post the member @A.R.L inferred people only showed up to J.Lo’s movies anyway because of her co-stars being huge and them drawing the crowds vs. Jennifer herself. Perhaps, instead of pulling up the box office chart above, they instead should’ve pulled up below chart which makes more sense in line of their leading actor/actress argument. 

 

And it's a fact, those movies jlo did wouldn't have made it without oscar winners like george clooney, jane fonda, matthew mcconaughey, jon voight and golden globe winner richard gere and oscar nominee ralph fiennes ? This is also why all of her high grossing films have all of these people in them or other popular people unlike when she's working with less interesting people.

 

1 hour ago, insomniac said:

Point being made, she is still one of the Top 100 Hollywood Leading Actresses at the Domestic Box Office, whether she has won Golden Globes/Oscars or not and whether you like her or not.

Are you serious?  Having jlo in movies with bigger/respected actors and big animated movies, whose revenue was also counted on that list, and ranks similar to or even above other actresses with much more impact/success/critical acclaim and RESPECT will not make jlo the respected actress or that she'll ever be taken seriously.

 

Just look at those oustanding names below her and have some shame.

 

I mean.. even beyoncé was above jlo when jlo put half her life into acting. 

 

44

Beyoncé Knowles

$1,074,336,242

8

$134,292,030

47

Jennifer Lopez

$1,063,853,837

27

$39,401,994

 

[insomniac]

1 hour ago, A.R.L said:

1. You're aware of the fact that there are actors with minor supporting roles that have made a bigger impact, right? Therefore, that list I posted is still valid.

 

 

2. And it's a fact, those movies jlo did wouldn't have made it without oscar winners like george clooney, jane fonda, matthew mcconaughey, jon voight and golden globe winner richard gere and oscar nominee ralph fiennes ? This is also why all of her high grossing films have all of these people in them or other popular people unlike when she's working with less interesting people.

 

3. Are you serious?  Having jlo in movies with bigger/respected actors and big animated movies, whose revenue was also counted on that list, and ranks similar to or even above other actresses with much more impact/success/critical acclaim and RESPECT will not make jlo the respected actress or that she'll ever be taken seriously.

 

Just look at those oustanding names below her and have some shame.

 

I mean.. even beyoncé was above jlo when jlo put half her life into acting. 

 

44

Beyoncé Knowles

$1,074,336,242

8

$134,292,030

47

Jennifer Lopez

$1,063,853,837

27

$39,401,994

 

1. A supporting actor in a movie (like many Marvel films with a gazillion people that show up for a few scenes) might’ve made ”bigger impact” on the box office but that doesn’t make that specific supporting actor/actress *is the* box office draw.

 

2. Nonsense! Sure, it’s the chemistry and the combination of the two leads that make a movie good and pull audiences, but you act like J.Lo’s movies were only successful *because of* her co-leads (which kickstarted our discussion). There’s a definite reason J.Lo gets cast in films as the lead because studios or streamers do the math / run the numbers to see what clicks with audiences. She’s very bankable, otherwise she wouldn’t be booked as a lead for more than 2 decades! This is the point I’m trying to make and you keep brushing over.
 

Also, you named legend Jane Fonda as an example of one of those actors on the list who drew audiences in for box office revenues *yet* she is lower on the list (below Jennifer). Make it make sense! In addition, some of these films, including Monster-In-Law, the co-lead booked the gig after J.Lo was already booked (aka studios signed her on because she’s bankable)! Jane Fonda has spoken about Jennifer saying she is the one people tuned in for (“people were gonna see it because of Jennifer Lopez”) and that she’s thankful because it gave her a comeback (video: at 17m55s timestamp):

 

 

3. I’m not talking about these lists making J.Lo the “more respected actress”. You are the one that started pulling out box office numbers to make it a point that Jennifer is not a bankable *leading* actress and that her movies are only a success because of her co-leads. I was just rebutting that’s incorrect by pulling up the correct receipts and a ranking whose methodology is based off female actresses that played the lead in a movie, and excluding the ones where they had just a very tiny role or showed up for 1 or 2 scenes.

 

Beyoncé is above J.Lo on that list because of The Lion King, which alone grossed more than half a Billion in the box office. But that doesn’t mean queen B is a bankable actress. No one is saying audiences flocked to see TLK *just because* Beyoncé played a co-leading role in that. Come on now.

 

In regards to your “have some shame” comments. I definitely won’t! There’s amazing actresses on that list that are above and below Jennifer. 
 

 

[reymiu]

9 minutes ago, insomniac said:

1. A supporting actor in a movie (like many Marvel films with a gazillion people that show up for a few scenes) might’ve made ”bigger impact” on the box office but that doesn’t make that specific supporting actor/actress *is the* box office draw.

 

2. Nonsense! Sure, it’s the chemistry and the combination of the two leads that make a movie good and pull audiences, but you act like J.Lo’s movies were only successful *because of* her co-leads (which kickstarted our discussion). There’s a definite reason J.Lo gets cast in films as the lead because studios or streamers do the math / run the numbers to see what clicks with audiences. She’s very bankable, otherwise she wouldn’t be booked as a lead for more than 2 decades! This is the point I’m trying to make and you keep brushing over.
 

Also, you named legend Jane Fonda as an example of one of those actors on the list who drew audiences in for box office revenues *yet* she is lower on the list (below Jennifer). Make it make sense! In addition, some of these films, including Monster-In-Law, the co-lead booked the gig after J.Lo was already booked (aka studios signed her on because she’s bankable)! Jane Fonda has spoken about Jennifer saying she is the one people tuned in for (“people were gonna see it because of Jennifer Lopez”) and that she’s thankful because it gave her a comeback (video: at 17m55s timestamp):

 

 

3. I’m not talking about these lists making J.Lo the “more respected actress”. You are the one that started pulling out box office numbers to make it a point that Jennifer is not a bankable *leading* actress and that her movies are only a success because of her co-leads. I was just rebutting that’s incorrect by pulling up the correct receipts and a ranking whose methodology is based off female actresses that played the lead in a movie, and excluding the ones where they had just a very tiny role or showed up for 1 or 2 scenes.

 

Beyoncé is above J.Lo on that list because of The Lion King, which alone grossed more than half a Billion in the box office. But that doesn’t mean queen B is a bankable actress. No one is saying audiences flocked to see TLK *just because* Beyoncé played a co-leading role in that. Come on now.

 

In regards to your “have some shame” comments. I definitely won’t! There’s amazing actresses on that list that are above and below Jennifer. 
 

 

Gurl don't bother w him... He just seems like he wants to dismiss JLo

[A.R.L]

3 hours ago, insomniac said:

Beyoncé is above J.Lo on that list because of The Lion King, which alone grossed more than half a Billion in the box office. But that doesn’t mean queen B is a bankable actress. No one is saying audiences flocked to see TLK *just because* Beyoncé played a co-leading role in that. Come on now.

 

 Which is why you shouldn't take that list seriously,  even me, though I don't like jlo, I admit that list wouldn't be a fair receipt against her from a beyoncé fan. 

Edited December 12, 2022 by A.R.L

[CosTaSsSs]

Queen Jen getting the haters jealous "bUt hOw?"

[insomniac]

51 minutes ago, A.R.L said:

 Which is why you shouldn't take that list seriously,  even me, though I don't like jlo as an actress, I admit that list wouldn't be a fair receipt against jlo from a beyoncé fan. 

Of course we can take that last list with just the female actresses in a leading role seriously when talking about box office success / bankability of a star. It’s a topic and list you brought up in means to discredit her. The receipts do show actual numbers and with some critical thinking around the type of ensemble cast and type of movie it is (animation, Marvel, Disney or whatever) it’s somewhat easy to deduct which factors contributed to a stars box office success. Not just your easy “ANy CO-LEad oF JLo MadE HeR MovIE AN ACTuaL SuCCeSs, NOt BeCAUse of HeR!” 

[insomniac]

3 hours ago, reymiu said:

Gurl don't bother w him... He just seems like he wants to dismiss JLo

Yeah you’re right. I’ll let it go 

[insomniac]

23 minutes ago, CosTaSsSs said:

Queen Jen getting the haters jealous "bUt hOw?"

[A.R.L]

14 minutes ago, insomniac said:

Of course we can take that last list with just the female actresses in a leading role seriously when talking about box office success / bankability of a star. It’s a topic and list you brought up in means to discredit her. The receipts do show actual numbers and with some critical thinking around the type of ensemble cast and type of movie it is (animation, Marvel, Disney or whatever) it’s somewhat easy to deduct which factors contributed to a stars box office success. Not just your easy “ANy CO-LEad oF JLo MadE HeR MovIE AN ACTuaL SuCCeSs, NOt BeCAUse of HeR!” 

 

I'm not even talking about that, but the fact that jlo isn't doing better roles is because she's not taken seriously, she's not the frida actress, u don't need the box office numbers to admit otherwise..

[Mokichi]

I thought it was gonna be released straight to Amazon Prime but there is screening?

 

 

or it's just a premiere thing? 

 

[Dark Phoenix]

8 hours ago, Mokichi said:

I thought it was gonna be released straight to Amazon Prime but there is screening?

 

 

or it's just a premiere thing? 

 

Looking in IMBD: https://m.imdb.com/title/tt9686790/releaseinfo?ref_=tt_dt_rdat

 

It shows that it will have a theatrical release in a few European and Asian markets before debuting in the USA on Prime, I guess that those deals were already done and the rights for international distribution were signed before the Prime deal, but anyway I’m not expecting much from those small markets, maybe $10M final, the biggest one is Germany.

[RockStarShit101]

This thread is a mess

it should be about this movie but you guys kinda went south

[CosTaSsSs]

I'm watching this next week! 

[Bloodflowers.]

I saw a billboard on the street that says this movie is premiring in cinemas on 26th of December here in Croatia! I might drag my current date to see this with me sometime in January on one of our dates

[Dabbyy]

it's out in a couple of countries already !

 

[CosTaSsSs]

Watched this on Thursday and it was so fun!! It was so nice to see Jen in an action-comedy. Her chemistry with Josh was great as well, but the true highlight of the film is Coolidge! 

[Cheers]

Can't wait to see this  LATINA LEGEND

[chiliam]

So glad that it was shown in theater in my country. 

Just watched it and its such a fun silly 2000s chick flick. Its better than Sandra Bullock 's The lost world & Julia Robert 's Ticket to paradise, fellow 2022 chick flick with leading stars. 

Theres some laugh out loud moments, Jenifer Coolidge and the supporting cast is hilarious, JLo and Josh are charismatic leads. Of course the plot is cheesy and basic, but who cares. Hollywood needs to brings back this chick flick genres to theater not streaming service.

[Dabbyy]

Glad you had fun!

[insomniac]

On 1/2/2023 at 5:33 PM, chiliam said:

So glad that it was shown in theater in my country. 

Just watched it and its such a fun silly 2000s chick flick. Its better than Sandra Bullock 's The lost world & Julia Robert 's Ticket to paradise, fellow 2022 chick flick with leading stars. 

Theres some laugh out loud moments, Jenifer Coolidge and the supporting cast is hilarious, JLo and Josh are charismatic leads. Of course the plot is cheesy and basic, but who cares. Hollywood needs to brings back this chick flick genres to theater not streaming service.

 

On 12/31/2022 at 9:17 AM, CosTaSsSs said:

Watched this on Thursday and it was so fun!! It was so nice to see Jen in an action-comedy. Her chemistry with Josh was great as well, but the true highlight of the film is Coolidge! 

sounds good! Can’t wait to see when it comes out in streaming in my country. So jealous you got a theatrical release!!

 

On 12/24/2022 at 5:40 PM, Bloodflowers. said:

I saw a billboard on the street that says this movie is premiring in cinemas on 26th of December here in Croatia! I might drag my current date to see this with me sometime in January on one of our dates

And, did you drag your date to the movies to see it? What did you think?

[Bloodflowers.]

1 hour ago, insomniac said:

 

sounds good! Can’t wait to see when it comes out in streaming in my country. So jealous you got a theatrical release!!

 

And, did you drag your date to the movies to see it? What did you think?

 

Not yet LOL we just went on a date for the first time yesterday!

 

[insomniac]

36 minutes ago, Bloodflowers. said:

 

Not yet LOL we just went on a date for the first time yesterday!

 

Cute!! Well good luck sis and you know what to do for your second date now