Jump to content

H100: As It Was 9x #1, Damn About Time #2


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, simmnfierzig said:

Meh idk about something else. Seems very likely to be the biggest album of the decade

I just hope. That’s all. The fact that a racist has a chance to finish 2029 with the biggest album of the decade is a mess :rip: 

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Ger

    12

  • Green

    7

  • Katamari

    4

  • QueenofCopyPaste

    3

Posted

Damn KING let em breathe

 

ln0599e.gif

Posted

Post is back to top 10 :jonny:

 

QueenofCopyPaste
Posted

LIZZO is coming for the #1

 

:jonny5:

 

its ABOUT DAMN TIME

Posted
20 hours ago, Katamari said:

wait so double  albums in the streaming era dont get certified twice? :deadbanana2: assuming it did sell lets say 2 million in pure does that total get cert 4 plus what ever is left from the sps ie it gets the 4x plat cert from the pure and the additional 2 milion from sps so it gets 6x plat cert alltogether

14 hours ago, Katamari said:

true but was just wondering 

 

did RIAA confirm this 

 

ln0599e.gif

Yeah that's exactly correct. It's a little convoluted, but if you look up their rules, it breaks down as something like:

  • For a "multi-disc set," each pure copy sold contributes a number of units equal to the number of CDs that are in the CD release, assuming a minimum total runtime of 100 minutes.
    • For example, Taylor's Red TV sales would likely count twice essentially, but the four-disc vinyl is still only two units, not four. This is because the actual CD set is only long enough to be double-disc.
  • For streams, it's a flat 1,500 streams per unit still, either way. For track sales, it's still a flat ten.
  • The above is all conditional based on the label requesting certification as a multi-disc set - so I would guess it's possible for them to not do so, whether intentionally or by mistake.
Posted

How is First Class above Runnin Up That Hill? :redface:

Posted

RUTH didn't reach top 3? :deadbanana:

Posted (edited)

Kate :cries:

That's why radio should be excluded from Hot 100.

Edited by Siberian Tiger
Posted

F*cking ****, I'm so DONE and over this f*cking joke. F*CK THIS.

 

MBBQoP-HotWings.thumb.gif.9e74e55c4367a2

 

That fad but cutie Jack Harlow above Mrs Kate? THE HELL IS GOING ON, I'M SO F*CKING TIRED.

Posted

FXZy6ijXoAASpMO?format=png&name=small

 

F*ck you Harry, f*ck you Lizzo, f*ck you Jack.

Posted

Two weeks in the top 10 for Bey :clap3: 

Posted

The way Kate effortlessly outstreamed and outsold everyone in the top 3 but radio still screwed everything up 

Posted

Some points in the top 10:

 

1. As It Was  262

2. About Damn Time  242

 

4. Running Up That Hill  236

 

9. BREAK MY SOUL  152

 

 

I think Harry will get the 10th week at #1. There's still 20 points of difference with Lizzo.

 

Lizzo will have a chance after her album release

Posted
19 minutes ago, Green said:

 

 

9. BREAK MY SOUL  152

 

Isn't #11 149? Nnn

Posted
Quote

Billboard 200:#10(+2)@PostMalone, twelve carat toothache 31,000 (290,000 units since release). *peak:#2*

:lakitu:

 

Quote

#10 Big Energy (+1)

is this charting in streaming at all? cringe on radio weight :biblionny:

Posted
35 minutes ago, Armani? said:

Isn't #11 149? Nnn

 

Points are lower for everyone this week. It seems like radio audience decreased for everyone

Posted
2 minutes ago, Green said:

 

Points are lower for everyone this week. It seems like radio audience decreased for everyone

Hopefully it keeps that way.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Ger-55 said:

Hopefully it keeps that way.

 

Ironically Kate lost more airplay points than the rest of the top 10 (it had 2 million audience less than predicted). That's why it's #4 instead of Jack  :rip: 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Green said:

 

Ironically Kate lost more airplay points than the rest of the top 10 (it had 2 million audience less than predicted). That's why it's #4 instead of Jack  :rip: 

Yeah, I saw that too, wtf. :rip: The way we never won. :gaycat6:

Posted

Do streams from non-user generated playlists (such as Today's Top Hits) count towards the charts? If so, how are those different from playlists curated by radio DJs that people like myself choose to listen to? And if so, why do I never hear complaints about streaming counting for the charts from the anti-radio crowd?

Posted
4 hours ago, Cruel Summer said:

Yeah that's exactly correct. It's a little convoluted, but if you look up their rules, it breaks down as something like:

  • For a "multi-disc set," each pure copy sold contributes a number of units equal to the number of CDs that are in the CD release, assuming a minimum total runtime of 100 minutes.
    • For example, Taylor's Red TV sales would likely count twice essentially, but the four-disc vinyl is still only two units, not four. This is because the actual CD set is only long enough to be double-disc.
  • For streams, it's a flat 1,500 streams per unit still, either way. For track sales, it's still a flat ten.
  • The above is all conditional based on the label requesting certification as a multi-disc set - so I would guess it's possible for them to not do so, whether intentionally or by mistake.

oh wow thanks for the breakdown :clap3: 

Posted

Lizzo hopefully next #1 album release week

Posted

why is this randomly charting??

Posted
4 minutes ago, CrimsonX said:

why is this randomly charting??

Picked up by radio (especially HAC).

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.