Jump to content

Kelly still suffering as her ex remains a thorn in her life


Genius1111

Recommended Posts

 

 

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Scott Gordon ruled that Blackstock could only stay on the property until June 1. Clarkson's ex-husband, however, did not quietly move out.

 

An insider recently told Us Weekly that Blackstock still milks Clarkson and acts as a "constant thorn" in her side despite finally being hammered out.

 

"[Blackstock] wanted to fight the order but was ultimately talked out of it," a source said.

 

The court ordered him to pay $12,500 per month to cover his rent, but the songstress still pays him more monthly by giving him $115,000 in spousal support until January 2024.

 

On top of that, the "Kelly Clarkson Show" host also pays him $45,601 in child support though she has the primary custody of their children. Blackstock, meanwhile, has one weekend with them each month while he still lives in Montana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is he getting so much money? Over 100k a month in spousal support and nearly 50k for child support does not sound right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bleuwaffle said:

yikes. this is why you sign a prenup.

This. I heard Piece By Piece in a restaurant last night and it made me cringe. :mazen:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, bleuwaffle said:

yikes. this is why you sign a prenup.

She did sign a prenup though :skull: It would have been worse if she hadn’t

 

He was even asking for the prenup to be ignored lol

Edited by zach
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't he ashamed in front of their kids? :rip:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“He never asks for money…” :rip:

 

Has a song ever been more wrong? Yikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God what pathetic loser

 

Stay away from her get a job, indeed

Edited by ahauntingnearu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why rich people shouldn't get married 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as a man (but even for a woman) I don’t understand how you can sleep at night treating a woman as your cash cow. i guess their whole relationship centered on that because he was her manager but like does he have no interest in working/supporting himself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Girl needs to get a better lawyer cuz the amount of money he gets from her is ridiculous, especially when she has sole custody of the kids...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/22/2022 at 5:04 AM, zach said:

She did sign a prenup though :skull: It would have been worse if she hadn’t

 

He was even asking for the prenup to be ignored lol

wait how does that work then? the prenup still grants him all this money even though she's the primary caretaker of their kids? that's absurd :deadbanana:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bleuwaffle said:

wait how does that work then? the prenup still grants him all this money even though she's the primary caretaker of their kids? that's absurd :deadbanana:

He was her manager or something which meant that the mixed business guaranteed him livelihood that he was accustomed to 

 

She messed up by mixing business with her personal life 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vrx. said:

He was her manager or something which meant that the mixed business guaranteed him livelihood that he was accustomed to 

 

She messed up by mixing business with her personal life 

oh damn. that man is shamelessly leeching off her name, i feel for bad for kelly. :rip:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bleuwaffle said:

wait how does that work then? the prenup still grants him all this money even though she's the primary caretaker of their kids? that's absurd :deadbanana:

Prenups are different from child support. You can’t take child support away through a prenup since that money is for the benefit of the kids. And he gets that much from child support because they’re insanely rich even if it’s for one weekend of the month. Child support is supposed to make it so the children have the same quality of life when they go between parents.
 

And spousal support is in theory supposed to be because he might have given up work opportunities because you assumed your partner was going to support you or to raise your children. It’s just temporary as his is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.