Jump to content

Nope | Jordan Peele - Out Now


Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, Freakshowvato said:

Honestly it could have easily been even 10 minutes for me ?? a youtube video.  I was so happy when it ended. I was SO excited prior but I ended up so bored and feeling like I was watching a preview of a film the entire time bc it just stays flat. 


I loved the male actor a lot, unlike others who say he’s too stoic. 

gifff.thumb.gif.5234e2bf24b21026389d43fe

  • Replies 246
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Roberto

    25

  • Uncatena

    17

  • Cherish

    9

  • Sharapov

    9

Posted
1 hour ago, Sharapov said:

gifff.thumb.gif.5234e2bf24b21026389d43fe

you literally have Ariana in your avi...

 

Sharapov

 

how is that relevant to disliking a film lmao I'm allowed to have an opinion ma'am

Posted

"Review: Jordan Peele’s ‘Nope’ is a slow, dull and repetitive disappointment"

"What Peele doesn’t have in “Nope” is a story or anything close to one. He has a situation, but it doesn’t develop. It more or less stays where it starts, with grander and louder versions of essentially the same scene. For the first 20 to 30 minutes, the audience waits for “Nope” to start. Then it realizes: Oh no, this is it."

 

Could not agree more.

 

https://datebook.sfchronicle.com/movies-tv/review-jordan-peeles-nope-is-a-slow-dull-and-repetitive-disappointment

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Freakshowvato said:

"Review: Jordan Peele’s ‘Nope’ is a slow, dull and repetitive disappointment"

"What Peele doesn’t have in “Nope” is a story or anything close to one. He has a situation, but it doesn’t develop. It more or less stays where it starts, with grander and louder versions of essentially the same scene. For the first 20 to 30 minutes, the audience waits for “Nope” to start. Then it realizes: Oh no, this is it."

 

Could not agree more.

 

https://datebook.sfchronicle.com/movies-tv/review-jordan-peeles-nope-is-a-slow-dull-and-repetitive-disappointment

 

Same I hate when movies are only good the last 30 minutes. I didn’t give a **** about all the dull build up. The suspense was not there like he thought. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, dussymob said:

Same I hate when movies are only good the last 30 minutes. I didn’t give a **** about all the dull build up. The suspense was not there like he thought. 

I actually agree the last 30 minutes was probably the best. The entire first hour could have been reduced to 5 minutes and I stand by that.

 

I do not hate on those who liked this film, more power to y'all.

 

But the fact I am being mocked for not liking a film over legitimate criticism is weird.

Posted

I liked it but there’s definitely some legitimate criticisms. The ending is a great section which I found really interesting and oddly beautiful, but the beginning absolutely pales in comparison. It genuinely does take forever to start going anywhere, which is a trend in movies and is starting to become quite grating. There’s a bit too many ideas going on, the subplot with the monkey and Steven Yuen’s character honestly doesn’t need to be there, you can remove it from the film and I don’t think it would have any impact at all. More scenes like the digestion one really could’ve helped the pacing and make this more interesting throughout, they don’t necessarily have to reveal anything and can keep the intrigue up while also showing little glimpses like that from earlier on, because that’s probably the most memorable scene from the movie (and it doesn’t even last that long or show that much so it definitely could’ve been taken further). The message behind the movie isn’t very clear either, looking an explanation up afterwards makes me appreciate it a lot more but that shouldn’t be a requirement to understand the point of the movie, and again the message could’ve been more developed and layered throughout the movie itself. 
 

Spoiler

Also, I wish there was an explanation as to why the creature only attacks when it is looked at. It’s a good metaphor for society, but I wish there was some reasoning behind it in the movie. And, again… it isn’t really made clear enough until the very end. Perhaps I missed something but it was kinda like, “oh, now it only attacks if they look at it? okay then”. It felt like a realisation that happened very suddenly. 

It worth watching and forming your own opinion. It’s not black or white a good or bad movie. There’s a lot that can be appreciated, and also a lot that can be viewed critically. 

Posted
1 hour ago, fountain said:

I liked it but there’s definitely some legitimate criticisms. The ending is a great section which I found really interesting and oddly beautiful, but the beginning absolutely pales in comparison. It genuinely does take forever to start going anywhere, which is a trend in movies and is starting to become quite grating. There’s a bit too many ideas going on, the subplot with the monkey and Steven Yuen’s character honestly doesn’t need to be there, you can remove it from the film and I don’t think it would have any impact at all. More scenes like the digestion one really could’ve helped the pacing and make this more interesting throughout, they don’t necessarily have to reveal anything and can keep the intrigue up while also showing little glimpses like that from earlier on, because that’s probably the most memorable scene from the movie (and it doesn’t even last that long or show that much so it definitely could’ve been taken further). The message behind the movie isn’t very clear either, looking an explanation up afterwards makes me appreciate it a lot more but that shouldn’t be a requirement to understand the point of the movie, and again the message could’ve been more developed and layered throughout the movie itself. 
 

  Reveal hidden contents

Also, I wish there was an explanation as to why the creature only attacks when it is looked at. It’s a good metaphor for society, but I wish there was some reasoning behind it in the movie. And, again… it isn’t really made clear enough until the very end. Perhaps I missed something but it was kinda like, “oh, now it only attacks if they look at it? okay then”. It felt like a realisation that happened very suddenly. 

It worth watching and forming your own opinion. It’s not black or white a good or bad movie. There’s a lot that can be appreciated, and also a lot that can be viewed critically. 

Without the Jupe and the Gordy’s Home scenes this movie literally doesn’t function. It is the heart of the film, essential to its themes and storytelling. 

Posted
1 hour ago, fountain said:

I liked it but there’s definitely some legitimate criticisms. The ending is a great section which I found really interesting and oddly beautiful, but the beginning absolutely pales in comparison. It genuinely does take forever to start going anywhere, which is a trend in movies and is starting to become quite grating. There’s a bit too many ideas going on, the subplot with the monkey and Steven Yuen’s character honestly doesn’t need to be there, you can remove it from the film and I don’t think it would have any impact at all. More scenes like the digestion one really could’ve helped the pacing and make this more interesting throughout, they don’t necessarily have to reveal anything and can keep the intrigue up while also showing little glimpses like that from earlier on, because that’s probably the most memorable scene from the movie (and it doesn’t even last that long or show that much so it definitely could’ve been taken further). The message behind the movie isn’t very clear either, looking an explanation up afterwards makes me appreciate it a lot more but that shouldn’t be a requirement to understand the point of the movie, and again the message could’ve been more developed and layered throughout the movie itself. 
 

  Hide contents

Also, I wish there was an explanation as to why the creature only attacks when it is looked at. It’s a good metaphor for society, but I wish there was some reasoning behind it in the movie. And, again… it isn’t really made clear enough until the very end. Perhaps I missed something but it was kinda like, “oh, now it only attacks if they look at it? okay then”. It felt like a realisation that happened very suddenly. 

It worth watching and forming your own opinion. It’s not black or white a good or bad movie. There’s a lot that can be appreciated, and also a lot that can be viewed critically. 

Spoiler

Kaluuya's character made it clear the "don't look at the creature" thing when he remembered the reaction of his horse when they were on the set, at the beginning of the movie, all of them looking at the animal and making it feel uncomfortable. Animals can feel intimidated when you look at them for a long time and they can attack you, same happened with JJ (people watches it in the sky for a long time because it's a flying saucer, something we don't usually see like never). 

 

Posted
13 hours ago, SchmoodRing said:

1. who is that in your avi?

2. how can you fall asleep to a movie like this especially in a theater?!
 

what? even with everything going on in that finale? i did feel sometype of way about brandon and daniel surviving though. kind of ruined the suspense for me. also how in the hell did they survive lol

what are people not getting by his character being purposely stoic lol also who's that in your avi? she's giving tinahse

what performance of lana del rey is that cause homegirl is going through it lol

 

1.

Amanda Reifer. She was the lead singer of the group, Cover Drive and is featured on Die Hard from Kendrick's latest album.

 

2.

I have quite a habit of sleeping in the middle of films when in the cinema :dies:. I slept during Doctor Strange in May too :rip: 

 

Posted
31 minutes ago, ChapelHooker said:

Without the Jupe and the Gordy’s Home scenes this movie literally doesn’t function. It is the heart of the film, essential to its themes and storytelling. 

I have to disagree tbh, I felt it detracted from the main plot and took time that it probably needed to be better developed and clearer. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Freakshowvato said:

I actually agree the last 30 minutes was probably the best. The entire first hour could have been reduced to 5 minutes and I stand by that.

 

I do not hate on those who liked this film, more power to y'all.

 

But the fact I am being mocked for not liking a film over legitimate criticism is weird.

Who is mocking you and why? :biblio:

Posted

I love how divisive this movie is. Some found it a masterpiece (me) and others just utterly trash. 

Posted
19 hours ago, Freakshowvato said:

"Review: Jordan Peele’s ‘Nope’ is a slow, dull and repetitive disappointment"

"What Peele doesn’t have in “Nope” is a story or anything close to one. He has a situation, but it doesn’t develop. It more or less stays where it starts, with grander and louder versions of essentially the same scene. For the first 20 to 30 minutes, the audience waits for “Nope” to start. Then it realizes: Oh no, this is it."

 

Could not agree more.

 

https://datebook.sfchronicle.com/movies-tv/review-jordan-peeles-nope-is-a-slow-dull-and-repetitive-disappointment

 

This is exactly how I felt about Nope.


I was so disappointed ? Some amazing ideas in it but it kind of went... nowhere.

 

The cloud moved more than the plot.

Posted

i loved it, it was very visually pleasing...

 

i love it's depiction of a "spaceship" 

 

 

 

Posted

The balloon scene had glued to my seat omg :jonny:

Posted

This was a masterpiece. :WAP:

Posted

I'm over an hour into this movie and for the most part - it just seems...boring.

 

Us >

Posted

It just got released here in Mexico and I think that the film was great, way better than Us and felt bigger than Get Out in technical aspects.

 

The plot was clever and I also think that it was a criticism to plastic waste because that ended up being the salvation/killer; also the mockery to social media obsession (tmz reporter) and the director dying because he wanted to capture the whole thing reminded me of influencers dying just to get the perfect picture.

 

Keke and Daniel ate every scene, Brandon was a nice revelation, Barbie cameo was a joke, Steven felt miscast tbh and out of place but well it’s LA area.

Posted

This was better than Us and Get Out, IMO. The cinematography and score were really good, and Keke surprised me.

 

Jordan Peele do needs a co-writer, cause he has amazing unique concepts but he struggles while developing those ideas into actual stories.

 

Now, I find it funny how people are making think pieces, video essays and trying to overanalyze a straightforward film like this one. :hoetenks: I understand that people's expectations were to have an underneath social message as in Get Out and Us, but Jesus. People talking about animal exploitation, shocking images, colonialism, LMAO. It's not that serious, ma. Like for sure those are themes from the movie, but that's it. It's not "a message".

 

 

Posted

The movie was good, but not as good as get out

Posted

The problem of this movie was the first hour, it needed to be more captivating and thrilling, the second half gets definitely better, especially the finale, it was great, overall a good movie with a great idea.

Posted

This movie is perfection :alexz:

Posted

The monkey subplot served no purpose. The horse audition was enough foreshadowing.

Posted
On 8/30/2022 at 4:35 PM, Freakshowvato said:

"Review: Jordan Peele’s ‘Nope’ is a slow, dull and repetitive disappointment"

"What Peele doesn’t have in “Nope” is a story or anything close to one. He has a situation, but it doesn’t develop. It more or less stays where it starts, with grander and louder versions of essentially the same scene. For the first 20 to 30 minutes, the audience waits for “Nope” to start. Then it realizes: Oh no, this is it."

 

Could not agree more.

 

https://datebook.sfchronicle.com/movies-tv/review-jordan-peeles-nope-is-a-slow-dull-and-repetitive-disappointment

 

I liked this movie, but I do think a stronger argument was needed. The parallelism between the two stories is cool, but I wished that at some point the two would merge in a more climactic way, its almost as if the thriller paste of the first two acts get lost into a simple western/alien hunt sequence at the end. I had high expectations given the psyco ending of Get Out. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.