Jump to content

2024 US Election Megathread ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ›๏ธ


khalyan
Lee!!
Message added by Lee!!,

It was decided based on feedback from the spring 2023 town hall to transition this thread back to being election specific. With the Civics section being able to house specific threads on many issues, we think having a generalized politics thread is not completely necessarily anymore.ย 
ย 

With that said, please continue to be respectful and remember that you do not always need to respond to everyone.ย 

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, Vroom Vroom said:

Is Biden really this scared of a challenger from the left? No major candidate is even running against him and this change will probably stop anyone that was even considering it. A president running for reelection should have no authority in picking the location of the first primary.ย 

If someone wants to run against Biden, they should be given a fair opportunity to make their case for the presidencyย 

I don't think he's scared for himself, but it is intended to be a power move to make it clear that there will never be a leftist that makes it through the nomination process after he's gone. The timing for such a move is right since the DNC is mad about how ambiguous the Iowa results were, with Pete getting declared the victor in terms of delegates far too late for their liking while also ending up losing the popular vote to Bernie anyway (which is ALWAYS expressly covered up whenever Iowa is mentioned). So the idpol idiots are screaming for Iowa and New Hampshire to be skipped due to being "unrepresentative white states" even though NH's constitution requires it by law to go first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 20.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Espresso

    6131

  • ClashAndBurn

    1949

  • GhostBox

    1789

  • Communion

    1167

Top Posters In This Topic

@Communionย I agree with you on Maryland, and it covers both black voters and less distance to travel than a North Carolina.

ย 

Virginia shouldn't be in contention for top ten, and I say this as a resident, because of its undeserved influence in off-off year elections immediately post presidential that's since 2010 been a wildly swinging bellweather. Mostly the grocery tax (according to those that flipped in focus groups) and Terry saying he didn't want parental involvement in the classroom without actually unpacking Christopher Rufo's lies properly lost him the race to Youngkin but Roe won that State House seat andย willย win back the Governorship in 2025 regardless of a Biden win or loss, and the Dem loses in Virginia, it'll be by a hair.ย 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason why putting Maryland first won't work, imo,ย  is that it's way too close to Washington, DC. That aspect holds it back by a lot, I'd reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ClashAndBurn said:

The reason why putting Maryland first won't work, imo,ย  is that it's way too close to Washington, DC. That aspect holds it back by a lot, I'd reckon.

@Communion Why Maryland and Virginia both wouldn't work. Fair point. Hmm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there you have it - get ready for the lost delegates for Biden and the legal fights.ย 

ย 

He may have owed Clyburn but he's about to get a massive headache.

ย 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ClashAndBurn said:

The problem with all these propositions is that they donโ€™t cynically โ€œrewardโ€ South Carolina for explicitly saving Joe Bidenโ€™s 2020 candidacy and helping crush the surge of Bernie Sanders from his Nevada victory that went either largely ignored by the beltway press or treated with such histrionics as to be compared to the rise of Hitler.

ย 

That is ultimately why SC is moving to the front of the line, and it helps that the DNC chairman is literally the guy from there who lost massively to Lindsey Graham despite the millions upon millions of dollars donated to him.

ย 

The idea is that itโ€™ll also give Kamala Harris a massive advantage over whatever โ€œprogressiveโ€ candidate that grifts hundreds of millions in grassroots money only to come nowhere close to doing even half as well as either of Bernieโ€™s failed campaigns. Ironically it also will serve the process of hurting Pete Buttigieg in any primary heโ€™s not the only establishment option.

At the same time, having SC first might have hurt someone like Biden as well. SC is usually what saved someone's campaign and turned their momentum around after underperforming in the other three states. Getting it out of the way first might make it not matter in the long run. Just as winning IA didn't ultimately matter for a campaign as well.

ย 

Candidates aren't going to put as much effort into it if they feel it's too swayed towards one candidate.

Edited by Mike91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One party wants the hitler nation back, the other wants to celebrate nothing advances and play hooky with billionaires. 3rd parties are as irrelevant as ever and the citizens are being radicalized in real time. Next year is going to be a doozy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the gop are making the balloon seem like 9/11 ๐Ÿ˜‚ literally no one will care about this next week.ย 
๐Ÿ’€

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GhostBox said:

The way the gop are making the balloon seem like 9/11 ๐Ÿ˜‚ literally no one will care about this next week.ย 
๐Ÿ’€

Same thing can be said about Jan 6. Another thing you have in common with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.