[jayyyxtee]

Are they?
If they were ugly would they have the same success?

[RatedG²]

If they were ugly they'd be flops. But they're not

[Katamari]

no

they are underrated more than anything

[Callum]

overexposed certainly, but not overrated.

[Jack. Bauer]

Yes.

[/THREAD]

[MikeFenty]

If they we're ugly they would have flop,like many popstars

But there just overexposed but underated,like someone above said

[jayyyxtee]

Originally posted by Katamari

no

they are underrated more than anything

Care to explain how they are underrated?

[Porygon2z]

They are way too underrated.

[Regina George]

Are they?
- No

If they were ugly would they have the same success?
- Obviously no, but tell us 10 artists successful and ugly

[jose168]

underrated, they make good music for teen-pop. they dont follow generic dance trends and still get hits. Would they be successful if they were ugly? no. but same could be said for 95% of all pop stars so...

[Glassheart]

Yes.

[BadBitches]

They are only there because of their looks, just like Justin.

[Regina George]

Originally posted by BadBitches

They are only there because of their looks, just like Justin.

That's just Liam

[Trent]

Nope.

They bad, you mad.

[Beautiful Sinner]

Very.

[Gossip_Boy]

Originally posted by RatedG²

If they were ugly they'd be flops. But they're not

.

[CoolestPerson12]

There's only one good looking guy in the group. But their songs are catchy, so I think their underrated tbh.

[Honey]

Originally posted by BadBitches

They are only there because of their looks, just like Justin.

.

[flossyspears]

they are more underrated, everyone assumes they are some teeny bopper boy band they have really good voices and great songs

[ChrisRTW]

Yes Mindless Behavior are way better.