[Scuba_Dive]

Not including the obvious ones... I mean of the CURRENT ones.

She's a "significant presence on every continent"... so... is she?

[givemethatpop]

Rihanna is too, even though she fails in some aspects like tours.

[Cap10Planet]

You make the same threads over and over again with just a different title.

[Rated R]

Well technically she isn't a big presence in Antarctica.

But Rihanna is the other major one, so no

[rihannabiggestfan]

Rihanna.

[Remixed]

yes she is the only one

[_DeviouS_]

No one really knows who Rihanna is when I ask in Latin America, so let's not got that far..


Gaga is the only truly global artist. Not even Beyonce can touch her. Maybe Britney.

[Chickenchiki]

No.

Originally posted by _DeviouS_

No one really knows who Rihanna is when I ask in Latin America, so let's not got that far..


Gaga is the only truly global artist. Not even Beyonce can touch her. Maybe Britney.

What are you talking about? I'm from Chile and Rihanna is currently bigger than Gaga. Everyone loves Rihanna here. Britney and Madonna are bigger than both though.

[MrDeeds]

Originally posted by _DeviouS_

No one really knows who Rihanna is when I ask in Latin America.


Maybe Britney

[Ainsworth]

No, there are plenty of others.

[LeonazNumber#1]

Originally posted by _DeviouS_

Maybe Britney.

Please don't say that Britney is global. In the UK Britney's songs havn't been played widely in years and its the same situation is most other parts of Europe, Africa & Asia. She may have been global in the past but she ain't anymore.

[Johnny]

Of course not, there are obviously others. Rihanna, Beyoncé, Coldplay (they've got a significant presence in Asia) are all global presences, and I'm only mentioning a few. I'm not understanding this "truly global" nonsense, becasue they're all very famous worldwide. The question isn't about who's more global, but simply who is global.

Not to mention I still consider Madonna a "modern" act even though she's not from this generation.

[King B]

No. I'm sure Africa doesn't use her. There really isn't a popstar other than mj that's known all over the world.

[Loghen]

Originally posted by Cap10Planet

You make the same threads over and over again with just a different title.

!!

and no.

[AnginaWilliams]

Yes, for the most part. Most of the other girls have large amounts of success localized in one or two regions of the world. I don't see how anybody can be considered "global" just because people in another country know your name. If you can't at least pull an arena-sized crowd then I don't see how you can get excited just because people know who you are. She's pulling stadium-sized crowds...

[EdgeOfAddiction]

My queen's name has been uttered by the young and old on every continent as they ***** pop to her jams. She is also a global superstar like GaGa.

My king, Tiziano, is also a global superstar. His name has been uttered by Italian tourists as they visit select countries.

[MrGravey]

Originally posted by Scuba_Dive

Not including the obvious ones... I mean of the CURRENT ones.

She's a "significant presence on every continent"... so... is she?

Gurr, where the Antartican stans at?

[LeonazNumber#1]

Originally posted by King B

No. I'm sure Africa doesn't use her.

http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=232467
OOPS. you tried tho.

[Chickenchiki]

Originally posted by LeonazNumber#1

Please don't say that Britney is global. In the UK Britney's songs havn't been played widely in years and its the same situation is most other parts of Europe, Africa & Asia. She may have been global in the past but she ain't anymore.

Her album flopped in the UK, but her tour did really well.

And I didn't know you visited every continent to see if they played Britney.

[MikeFenty]

No,she is not