No. they arent much different from actors/singers who have sex scenes .. the only difference is **** is more honest in terms of graphic sex
the only difference between Jenna Jameson and Angelina Jolie is Angelina cant show her vagina on screen ... other than that they both get naked and perform for cameras
BRITNEY - GAGA - KANYE - RIHANNA - BEP
R.I.P MICHAEL JACKSON
Its like your screaming, and noone can hear. You almost feel ashamed. That someone could be that important that without them you feel like nothing. Noone will ever understand how much it hurts. You feel HOPELESS. Like nothing can save you ...<3
I guess yes?They're basically just having sex for money.They're just doing it in front of cameras.
That,and they usually don't get paid by the person who has sex with them.So yeah,they have their differences and similarities.They're no SAME.
Some are and some are, it depends on the level of acting skill imo...
Off topic, but i think it's ignorant and judgmental that so many people have such a negative view of prostitues... And to add in a little irony, there's a lot of **** stars that are basically prostitues themselves, so...
I answered your question dummy. You don't deserve my thoughts.
Originally posted by emmanuel_punk
^^ Die! why you don't go and stan for someone else? I don't know why I call you to comeback here back in 2011 you are such a damn annoying MESS! and now I get into the point of I CAN'T STAND YOU!
please do us a favor and retire.
most **** actors are escorts. an escort is polite language for you know what.so i say yes they are. plus sex for money is .........¿ its just logic.
thats actually very true. **** is just like their advertising. They make their real money from their ahem "escorting" and private party jobs. **** doesn't even pay much these days. Not like it used to when people actually paid for it buying dvds etc