[BadBitch]

Funny thing: Iowa already is a same-sex marriage state, allowing homosexual unions. But, as many who paid attention in civics and history classes know, a Constitutional amendment would trump a state's law, either enhancing or nullifying it. Since defining marriage as a purely heterosexual union is the aim of the pledge, enhancement is a moot point. However, keeping the amendment away from abridging other freedoms protected in the Constitution might be a problem.

And ****ography? A federal law or amendment banning ****ography could become a problem in an industry that is disseminated in hard copy formats and on the Internet (not to mention via phones). But these guys, Bachmann and Santorum, are free-market Republicans, correct? A ban on **** would facilitate the emergence of an illegal underground industry (considering the 40 million Americans access **** sites regularly). It is already a multi-billion-dollar per year industry (and that's just on the Internet). Perhaps a return to the days of Prohibition (just substitute sex for alcohol) might be necessary for the government to begin regulating the adult industries (which are already regulated -- but aren't Republicans against most governmental regulating of businesses?). Besides, banning ****ography for these guys would be simple. Unlike many who use ****ography as a sexual stimulant and relationship enhancer, Bachmann and Santorum obviously do not need such in their lives, having eleven children between them in their respective marriages.

At least taking a second vow of marital fidelity might not have been a waste of time (if one assumes, just for laughs, that either of these two will ever become president). Besides, fidelity has always been the measure of a great leader. One great example is the Bible's own King Solomon, who is reported to have had hundreds of wives and concubines, to all of whom he was probably faithful (maybe, most likely... it was a long time ago, so who really knows?). But the "Marriage Vow" equates bigamy and polygamy to homosexuality, which Santorum and Bachmann would like to restrict -- or so they've pledged. Maybe the ruler considered to be among the wisest of all time was not a great example. Perhaps a better example would have been King David...

Funny how there seems to be a lot of reconciling that has to be done with regard to that pledge.

http://news.yahoo.com/santorum-joins...214900881.html

[Cheers]

They better leave my **** alone.

[mariska]

The hypocrisy with banning **** is absolutely ridiculous. Is that not exactly what they stand against? To let the market dictate?

[iamvladd]

Republicans are a mess this era.

[Jameson Teqkilla]

Originally posted by iamvladd

Republicans are a mess this era.

Their single choices...

[MusicTalker]

I hate to say it, but it would be cruel to ban ****ography for some - it may legimatley be a way for a depressed person to get happy, for example...Lol.

Would they rather them use drugs or watch legal ****?

[MusicTalker]

Originally posted by iamvladd

Republicans are a mess this era.

Era

[primo.]

Oh hell no. Not my smut!

;;;;;;;lkjmmmmmmmm
klklkoojn.....kjikjm

[Jameson Teqkilla]

Originally posted by ****y On Venus

Oh hell no. Not my smut!

;;;;;;;lkjmmmmmmmm
klklkoojn.....kjikjm

I am hypnotized by how still her boobs are staying.

[Husky]

NO ****?!

[Jared]

DEATH. I bet half of his projected voters watch ****. This guys is a mess, almost as bad as Rick Perry.

[Pizzazz]

It's a trip how republicans call Obama and democrats in general socialists and claim that government controls too much but they're always trying to control or wanting a say in who you can marry, your uterus, what you can watch, etc.

[Jameson Teqkilla]

Originally posted by Pizzazz

It's a trip how republicans call Obama and democrats in general socialists and claim that government controls too much but they're always trying to control or wanting a say in who you can marry, your uterus, what you can watch, etc.

Book them. I didn't realize a "small government" was one that invaded my bedroom.

[BadBitch]

Originally posted by Jared

DEATH. I bet half of his projected voters watch ****. This guys is a mess, almost as bad as Rick Perry.

!!!
and it's not causing people harm.

[Patrick]

Empty threats.

[RichGirlPlanet]

Originally posted by ****y On Venus

Oh hell no. Not my smut!

;;;;;;;lkjmmmmmmmm
klklkoojn.....kjikjm

[BadBitch]

Originally posted by mariska

The hypocrisy with banning **** is absolutely ridiculous. Is that not exactly what they stand against? To let the market dictate?

Not to mention the millions of jobs that would be lost. Let's not even get into angry 44 Million Americans who use it per day.

[Jared]

Originally posted by Pizzazz

It's a trip how republicans call Obama and democrats in general socialists and claim that government controls too much but they're always trying to control or wanting a say in who you can marry, your uterus, what you can watch, etc.

Originally posted by Jameson Teqkilla

Book them. I didn't realize a "small government" was one that invaded my bedroom.

Clock those republicans!

[Jameson Teqkilla]

Originally posted by BadBitch

!!!
and it's not causing people harm.

I do admit the blatant misogyny of some straight **** does worry me though.

There's a lot of **** that seems to promote the message "If a woman pisses you off, you get to **** her as hard as you want!"

That ain't cool.

[Swaggie]

Originally posted by iamvladd

Republicans are a mess this era.

Originally posted by Jameson Teqkilla

Their single choices...